Archive for June 16th, 2010
Fed Ponders What To Do If Recovery Fails; Risks to Growth All on Downside
While nearly everyone seems convinced that the economy is improving and buy-the-dip is the right strategy, the Fed is having increasing concerns about what to do if reflation does not take hold.
The Wall Street Journal discusses “What if?” scenarios in Fed Weighs Growth Risks.
Federal Reserve officials are beginning to debate quietly what steps they might take if the recovery surprisingly falters or if the inflation rate falls much more.
Fed officials, who meet next week to survey the state of the economy, believe a durable recovery is on track and their next move—though a ways off—will be to tighten credit, not ease it further. Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke has played down the risk of a double-dip recession and signaled guarded confidence in the recovery.
But behind-the-scenes discussions at the meeting could include precautionary talk about what happens if the economy doesn’t perform as well as expected.
“If events in Europe evolve so that they have a more severe and broad impact on financial markets, then the scope of the problems for the U.S. could be magnified,” Charles Evans, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, said in a speech last week.
Brian Sack, the head of the New York Fed’s powerful markets group, has talked about “two-sided” risks to the economy—in other words, the risk that growth and inflation could turn out to be lower than expected, as well as higher.
“The European sovereign-debt situation is serious, and there are many unanswered questions about how events will unfold,” James Bullard, St. Louis Fed president, said in Tokyo on Monday.
Officials don’t rule out the possibility that markets could settle and the economy could produce a few months of strong job growth and solid consumer spending and business investment.
But there are other scenarios: if the recovery falters, or if inflation slows much further and a threat arises of deflation, a debilitating fall in prices across the economy. In such cases, there would be a few avenues the Fed could take.
One is asset purchases. During the financial crisis, the Fed purchased $1.25 trillion in mortgage-backed securities on top of buying debt issues by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the U.S. Treasury. Mr. Bernanke has said the steps helped to lower long-term interest rates, including rates on mortgages.
In any case, a new report by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, based on projections for inflation and unemployment, suggests that the Fed may not need to raise short-term interest rates to curb growth or inflation until early 2012, later than is commonly expected on Wall Street.
The report cites a rule of thumb that the Fed tends to lower the federal-funds rate by 1.3 percentage points if inflation falls by one percentage point and by almost two percentage points if the unemployment rate rises by one percentage point.
Based on that rule, the federal-funds rate—now near zero—would be minus 2.9% under today’s conditions and wouldn’t need to move higher until the first half of 2012, according to San Francisco Fed economist Glenn Rudebusch. The analysis factors in the stimulus the Fed has provided with its mortgage purchases.
“It seems likely that the Fed’s exit from the current accommodative stance of monetary policy will take a significant period of time,” the report said.
Risks to Growth All on Downside
The reality is reflation has already failed and other than unsustainable government spending (and massive increases in public debt), the US economy would still be in recession.
Looking ahead, the risks to growth are all on the downside. Here are some of them.
- China overheats and has to step on the economic brakes
- Spain or Italy need Euro bailouts
- Property bubbles in China, Canada, Australia pop.
- Austerity measures throw the Eurozone back in recession
- Huge public worker layoffs in the US
- US housing demand weakens further, housing prices slip, construction dips, and inventory rises from already high levels
- US unemployment starts to rise
- UK heads bank in recession
- Congress starts huge trade wars with China by labeling China a currency manipulator and employs large punitive tariffs
I expect everyone of those to happen with the possible exception of labeling China a currency manipulator. Thus, this is not a case of what the Fed will do “if” the recovery fails, but rather what the Fed will do “when” the recovery fails.
Bear in mind that the only semblance of economic recovery is from government spending, nearly all of it wasted or taking from future demand, thus the reflation efforts have already failed.
Finally, given an expected dramatic shift in Congress this November coupled with increasing worry over deficits and public anger over bailouts to date, reflation round two will play out much differently than did round one.
Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com
Click Here To Scroll Thru My Recent Post List
Gear up for another lost decade in real estate. Housing will remain stagnate from 2010 to 2020. Demographic shifts, higher mortgage rates, and shifting consumer taste in real estate.
The dynamics for housing moving forward point to a very bleak future and a potential lost decade yet again from 2010 to 2020. Housing has a treacherous path moving forward and deep down demographic shifts will keep a lid on any significant housing appreciation moving forward. The economy is in the process of deleveraging from a market highly dependent on real estate. Wall Street and the government are doing everything they can to bring back the economy of yesterday but have had little success. This recession has shrunk the middle class so those looking to buy homes have declined simply because many can no longer afford to purchase a home even at today’s lower prices. Focusing on housing first was a big expensive policy mistake where we should have focused on creating sustainable jobs. The market is slowly shifting to a new housing paradigm. Family growth rates, employment trends, baby boomers, and wages will all keep a lid on housing prices moving forward.
First we should break down the entire housing market:
Source: Census
The U.S. has a large number of homeowners. A total of 75 million Americans can lay the claim to owning their home. 23 million of this group (31 percent) actually owns their homes outright with no mortgage. Of course not having a mortgage does not mean that these homeowners have no housing associated cost. They still need to pay yearly property taxes, insurance, and all the cost in maintaining a home. Another 37 million American households rent. These are the basic dynamics of the housing market.
Of those homeowners with a mortgage, 7.2 million (14%) are in foreclosure or 30+ days late on their mortgage. This practically guarantees a few years of cheaper housing hitting the market in a steady trickle. This puts a herculean hold on any significant home building going forward.
From the recent Federal Reserve Flow of Funds Report, we find that current outstanding mortgage debt is $10.334 trillion. We have to break out the renters and the homeowners with no mortgage and find that the average mortgage debt for homeowners is:
$10.334 trillion / 51.575 million mortgaged households = $200,374
The current median home price comes in at approximately $170,000. Now some would argue that housing will regain traction and go on to rising to new levels. Yet this assumption assumes that middle class wages will be growing moving forward. If we look closely at the data the only real winner so far in this economic crisis is Wall Street but average Americans have seen very little benefit from the current bailout measures. Now those with big investment bank salaries can afford their piece of prime real estate in Manhattan or the Hamptons but this does not make up the bulk of the housing market. The bulk of the housing market is highly dependent on how middle class Americans are doing.
If we look at the current unemployment levels by age group, we see that those in the household forming age ranges or those entering into these categories, are taking on the brunt of this recession:
You can see that up to age 34, the unemployment rate is trending much higher than the total national average. These are prime age groups for forming households and if a family is not feeling safe financially, they will delay on purchasing a home. The middle class young family is also delaying on having children so the necessity for a bigger home is also being pushed out. This demographic shift is happening at the same time that baby boomers start entering retirement age and many will want to downsize.
And many of these people have a buffer for equity to sell since they bought prior to the housing bubble. Take for example data on current owner households:
Moved in before 1989: 20.5% of all homeowners
Moved in before 1990: 40.9% of all homeowners
It is highly likely that in this group, you have many baby boomers that will sell to downsize in the years coming forward and the current decline in prices will only cut into their equity but not put them underwater given the decade long bubble. They purchased before that. Those that moved in before 1989 will have a much larger cushion. So there is a large group of people that will sell regardless of market trends because they will have to simply because of life changing events.
And then on the other hand we have the fact that one-third of homeowners in certain states are underwater on their mortgages. Take for example California:
California has a large renting population and most that own a home carry a mortgage (77 percent). Of those that carry a mortgage a stunning one-third are underwater. In other words 1.76 million mortgages in California are attached to homes that are worth less than the actual balance of the mortgage creating a large incentive to walk-away. Many of these loans come from Alt-A paper and option ARMs. These loans will impact the market at least until 2012 and hurt the state. California isn’t immune and other states like Nevada, Florida, and Arizona have similar dynamics. In fact, here is the amount of mortgage debt in a negative equity position according to a recent Deutsche Bank analysis:
California: $969 billion
Florida: $432 billion
Arizona: $140 billion
The only way that things would improve for banks is if prices moved higher. But how can prices move higher if middle class Americans are dealing with high unemployment and stagnant wages? The Federal Reserve and U.S. Treasury have really reached the end of options in terms of what they can do. Even the 30 year fixed mortgage is at all time lows in the midst of all this turmoil:

The 40 year average for 30 year rates is closer to 9 percent. Today it is under 5 percent. That is unsustainable and as we move forward with insurmountable levels of national debt, the rate will have to rise. I know this seems impossible for many but as we have seen with other debt ridden countries, the market can turn on like a tornado and quickly change the dynamics of the situation. For the housing market, this will mean even more pressure to keep prices muted.
The only way home prices can rise in a healthy manner is if we start seeing wage inflation. We saw some of this in the 1970s where wages went up in tandem with home prices. In the last decade, wages moved sideways while home prices went into a bubble. As far as the economy going forward, the big job sectors seem to be in low paying service sector jobs. Certainly someone can purchase a house with these jobs but not at current prices even though they appear to be solid.
The Federal Reserve and the U.S. Treasury have done everything to slam the dollar and create some level of inflation. Yet other central banks are doing the same. So what happens is easy money flows to Wall Street for gambling while the real economy stagnates. It is hard for many to believe that we will have another lost decade in housing but there is little reason to believe that prices will soon start to outpace inflation. In fact, in the last year or two we have been dealing more with aspects of deflation. We need to keep an eye on the real value of home prices adjusting for inflation/deflation.
9 Reasons Why Spain Is A Dead Economy Walking
Barring an economic bailout of mammoth proportions, the economy of Spain is completely and totally doomed. The socialist government of Spain is drowning in debt, unemployment is running rampant and everywhere you turn there are major economic problems. So will Spain be the next Greece? No. When the economy of Spain implodes it is going to be a whole lot worse for the world economy. The economy of Spain is more than four times the size of the economy of Greece. Spain accounts for 11.5 percent of eurozone GDP while Greece only accounts for approximately 2.5 percent. Spain is the 4th largest economy in the 16 nation eurozone and it is the 10th largest economy in the world. If the economy of Spain fails it will cause a shockwave that will be felt in every corner of the globe. In fact, there are quite a few analysts that believe if Spain defaults it would ultimately lead to the breakup of the eurozone.
So will the EU step up and bail out Spain? Well, there are rumors that EU officials have begun work on a bailout package for Spain which is likely to run into the hundreds of billions of dollars, but on Monday the European Commission, the Spanish government and the German government all denied that the European Union was preparing a bailout for the Spanish economy.
Of course we all know that politicians don’t always tell us the truth.
So who knows what is going on over there right now.
But the reality is that the economy of Spain is not going to make it much longer without serious help, and some EU officials are already using apocalyptic language to describe what an economic collapse in Spain would mean.
For example, EU Commission President Jose Manuel Barroso recently warned that democracy could completely collapse in Greece, Spain and Portugal unless urgent action is taken to tackle the burgeoning European debt crisis.
So could democracy actually fail in those nations?
Well, considering the fact that Greece, Spain and Portugal only became democracies in the 1970s, and that all three of those countries have a history of military coups, such a scenario is not that far-fetched.
Without a doubt there would be serious public unrest in those nations if public services collapsed because their governments ran out of money.
So are there signs that the economy of Spain is about to collapse?
Well, yes, there are quite a few of them.
The following are 9 reasons why Spain is a dead economy walking….
#1) Even before this most recent crisis, unemployment in Spain was approaching Great Depression levels. Spain now has the highest unemployment rate in the entire European Union. More than 20 percent of working age Spaniards were unemployed during the first quarter of 2010. If people aren’t working they can’t pay taxes and they can’t provide for their families.
#2) In an effort to stimulate the economy, Spain’s socialist government has been spending unprecedented amounts of money and that skyrocketed the government budget deficit to a stunning 11.4 percent of GDP in 2009. That is completely unsustainable by any definition.
#3) The total of all public and private debt in Spain has now reached 270 percent of GDP.
#4) The Spanish government has accumulated way more debt than it can possibly handle, and this has forced two international ratings agencies, Fitch and Standard & Poor’s, to lower Spain’s long-term sovereign credit rating. These downgrades are making it much more expensive for Spain to finance its debt at a time when they simply can’t afford to pay more interest on their debt.
#5) There are 1.6 million unsold properties in Spain. That is six times the level per capita in the United States. Considering how bad the U.S. real estate market is, that statistic is incredibly alarming.
#6) The new “green economy” in Spain has been a total flop. Socialist leaders promised that implementing hardcore restrictions on carbon emissions and forcing the nation over to a “green economy” would result in a flood of “green jobs”. But that simply did not happen. In fact, a leaked internal assessment produced by the government of Spain reveals that the “green economy” has been an absolute economic nightmare for that nation. Energy prices have skyrocketed in Spain and the new “green economy” in that nation has actually lost more than two jobs for every job that it has created. But Spain so far seems unwilling to undo all of the crazy regulations that they have implemented.
#7) Spain’s national debt is so onerous that they are now caught in a debt spiral where anything they do will harm the economy. If they cut government expenditures in an effort to get debt under control it will devastate economic growth and crush badly needed tax revenues. But if the Spanish government keeps borrowing money their credit rating will continue to decline and they will almost certainly default. The truth is that the Spanish government is caught in a “no win” situation.
#8) But even now the IMF is projecting that the Spanish economy is going nowhere fast. The International Monetary Fund says there will be no positive GDP growth in Spain until 2011, at which point it will still be below one percent. As bleak as that forecast is, many analysts believe that it is way too optimistic considering the fact that Spain’s economy declined by about 3.6 percent in 2009 and things are rapidly getting worse.
#9) The Spanish population has gotten used to socialist handouts and they are not going to accept public sector pay cuts, budget cuts to social programs and hefty tax increases easily. In fact, there is likely to be some very serious social unrest before all of this is said and done. On May 21st, thousands of public sector workers took to the streets of Spain to protest the government’s austerity plan. But that was only an appetizer. Spain’s two main unions are calling for a major one day general strike to protest the government’s planned reforms of the country’s labor market. The truth is that financial shock therapy does not go down very well in highly socialized nations such as Greece and Spain. In fact, the austerity measures that Spain has been pressured to implement by the IMF have proven so unpopular that many are now projecting that Spain’s socialist government will be forced to call early elections.
So what is going to happen in Spain?
The truth is that nobody can predict for sure how things are going to play out over the coming weeks and months.
But what everyone can agree on is that the stakes are incredibly high.
Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, world famous economist Nouriel Roubini put it this way: “If Greece goes under, that’s a problem for the eurozone. If Spain goes under, it’s a disaster.”
But right now the entire population of Spain (along with much of the rest of the world) is completely distracted by the World Cup. As long as the Spanish team does well, that is likely to keep the Spanish population sedated. But if the Spanish team gets knocked out of the tournament early that will put the entire Spanish population in a really, really bad mood and that could mean a really chaotic summer for the nation of Spain.
Obama To Use BP Oil Spill As An Opportunity To Push His Economy Killing Climate Change Bill
Never one to to allow a “good crisis” to go to waste, Barack Obama is pledging to use the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico as an opportunity to push the U.S. Congress to pass his controversial climate bill. In fact, during a recent interview Obama directly compared the current crisis in the Gulf to 9/11, and indicated that he believed that it would fundamentally change the way that we all look at energy issues from now on. But the truth is that Obama’s climate bill is the same economy killing legislation that it was before the BP oil spill. It would still drive gas and electricity prices through the roof, it would still cause large numbers of U.S. businesses to flee overseas, it would still be one of the biggest tax increases in U.S. history and it would still usher in an unprecedented era of climate fascism. But now thanks to the BP oil spill there is suddenly a lot more momentum in Congress for doing something about energy and about “climate change”.
Of course the truth is that carbon dioxide is not causing climate change and high levels of carbon dioxide are actually very good for the environment, but reducing carbon emissions has almost become a religion for radical environmentalists, and Barack Obama is absolutely determined to push through his “cap and trade” carbon trading scheme. In fact, just as 9/11 completely changed the war that Americans viewed the fight against terrorism, Barack Obama sees the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico fundamentally changing the way that Americans see energy issues. During a recent interview, Obama told Politico columnist Roger Simon the following….
“In the same way that our view of our vulnerabilities and our foreign policy was shaped profoundly by 9/11, I think this disaster is going to shape how we think about the environment and energy for many years to come.”
Not only that, but Obama considers it one of his greatest “leadership challenges” to make sure that we all “draw the right lessons” from the BP oil spill….
“One of the biggest leadership challenges for me going forward is going to be to make sure that we draw the right lessons from this disaster.”
So what are those “right lessons”?
Well, apparently what we are all supposed to get out of this disaster are the lessons that Obama has been trying to “teach” us all along – that carbon taxes and cap and trade schemes are good for us.
But Barack Obama is not the only one urging us to learn the “right lessons” from the BP oil spill.
In a recent interview with ABC News, Microsoft’s Bill Gates also linked the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico with “climate change”. Gates warned that if we don’t make the necessary changes soon that we will suffer severe consequences….
“We’ll have more crises like the oil spill and we’ll have the supply disruption. We’ll start to see more and more effects of the climate problem.”
But would the climate bill that Obama is pushing really save us from “climate change”?
Of course not.
But Barack Obama’s climate change bill would do the following things….
*It would drive gas and electricity prices through the roof.
*It would crush the already fragile U.S. economy by piling a bunch of new taxes and regulations on U.S. businesses. Needless to say, large numbers of them would begin looking for greener pastures.
*It would increase worldwide pollution by forcing companies out of the U.S. and into nations that have no restrictions on pollution whatsoever.
*When you add up all of the overt and hidden taxes in the bill, it would represent one of the biggest tax increases in U.S. history.
*Since every action we take involves the production of carbon emissions (including every breath that we take), it would open the door for an era of tyrannical climate fascism where the U.S. government literally monitors every aspect of our lives to make sure that we are being “eco-friendly”.
But Barack Obama makes this climate bill sound like it is the greatest thing since sliced bread. In fact, he continues to promise that the number of “green jobs” gained by this bill will far outweigh the number of other jobs lost.
But is this true?
Of course not.
In fact, other countries that have tried a “cap and trade” scheme have experienced disastrous results. For example, a leaked internal assessment produced by the government of Spain reveals that the “green economy” there has been an absolute economic nightmare for that nation. Energy prices have skyrocketed in Spain and the new “green economy” in that nation has actually lost more than two jobs for every job that it has created.
The unemployment rate in Spain is now hovering around 20 percent and the economy there is on the verge of complete and total collapse. In fact, if the government of Spain does end up defaulting on their debts, it could make the financial crisis that has been unfolding in Greece look like a Sunday picnic.
It should be obvious to anyone with a brain that a climate bill like the one Spain implemented will devastate the U.S. economy. But facts haven’t gotten in the way of Barack Obama pushing his agenda before, so why should they now?
However, it is not just Barack Obama that is pushing an agenda of trying to radically reduce carbon emissions. All over the world, many of the global elite have joined forces with the radical environmentalists in an effort to “save the world” from the growing “threat” of carbon dioxide.
And since each person on this planet is a source of constant carbon emissions, many of those who truly believe in this radical environmental agenda consider the rapidly growing population of the earth to be the number one cause of climate change.
You see, to those obsessed with “climate change”, just getting corporations around the globe to radically cut carbon emissions is not nearly going to be good enough. The truth is that they know that in order to get carbon emissions down to where they want them to be, they are going to have to do something about the growing world population.
To them, in the “war against climate change” anyone who breathes is the enemy. In fact, according to an official UN report, no human can ever truly be “carbon neutral”.
So please understand that for those obsessed with climate change, “carbon taxes” and “cap and trade” are just the beginning. To truly achieve their goals, “one child policies” and “forced abortions” will also be necessary.
So if Barack Obama does get his climate bill pushed through Congress and it does kill the U.S. economy, that would only be a “first step” for those truly dedicated to the radical environmental agenda. What they have planned down the road is a whole lot more horrific.
DING! This Is Called "A Good Start" (TBW)
By Karl Denninger
An indictment unsealed today in federal court in Alexandria, Virginia, alleges that Farkas, 57, and fellow conspirators sought to deceive financial firms and TARP by covering up shortfalls at his closely held mortgage lending company based in Ocala, Florida. The company filed for bankruptcy in August 2009.
Yep, and a big part of it was related to Colonial Bank, a firm that I have written about extensively, including their penchant for believing they were “well-capitalized” despite being chock-full-to-the-nuts with commercial real estate holdings in bubble areas.
If you remember, I wrote a few pieces on the TBW cease-and-desist order and a raid on a Colonial office, both in 2009. Then there was the truth that finally came out on the outrageous over-valuation of their “internal values” in the portfolio – 37% in total that was exposed when BB&T took them over in one of last year’s “forced marriages.”
While it’s nice to see some indictment paper flowing on this, I remain unimpressed that we have yet to see actual BANK EXECUTIVES in the dock, as everything that we’ve seen certainly indicates that they were complicit (at best) in what went on during this period of time. Indeed, there are even statements that in some cases (like the municipal bid-rigging scams for GICs) some banks have been offered immunity in exchange for cooperation – even though they were (by far) the biggest beneficiaries in “earning” money they weren’t entitled to and they have, so far, kept it.
On balance I’ll call this “A Good Start”, but until I see bank executives in the dock to go along with the non-bank folks who are being rounded up, color me jaded and unimpressed.
I'll Huff And I'll Puff….
By Karl Denninger
.. and I’ll blow your banks up!
“We’re not afraid of transparency,” said the Spanish Banking Association (AEB), saying the full truth would put an end to rumours battering Spain’s instutitions. El Pais reported that the government backs the initiative, putting it on a collision course with Germany which insists on secrecy.
Josef Ackermann, head of Deutsche Bank, warned last week that it would be “very dangerous” to publish the results of each bank, fearing that it would trigger flight from weak lenders and set off a chain reaction.
Oh, Douche Bank thinks it’s “very dangerous” to publish the truth about things like, say, leverage ratios?

Santander and BBVA are probably ok – and they’re the two “biggies.” (Incidentally and in the interest of full disclosure, I have a business account with Compass, which is owned by BBVA – so I watch them rather closely.) The “cajas”, or smaller regional savings banks? Not so much – they’re likely all broke, having speculated a wee bit too much on rising property values (you know, like our banks did, writing mortgages at insane DTI and LTV ratios, thereby supported by exactly nothing other than continually-rising prices. When that didn’t happen…..)
By contrast, some German banks may look very ugly. An internal memo last year by the regulator BaFin feared that write-offs might reach €800bn. German banks have accumulated a double set of loses from both US subprime and the Club Med debt crisis. They have the lowest risk-adjusted capital ratios in the world after Japan and have not exploited the global rally to rebuild their base.
No, really?
Back in November of 2008, among other times, I noted that European banks have much higher leverage than our banks, and far worse “transparency.” To put it bluntly if our large banks are insolvent on a mark-to-market basis (and I believe they all are) those big banks over in Germany and elsewhere are smoking craters by comparison.
This is the ugly little secret, and is why the ECB is buying Greek (and now probably Spanish) debt by the boatload. The “Bailout” is not about Greece, which now has IMF funding and thus doesn’t have to sell jack into the market for the next year or two, it is about protecting the banks that made bad loans – again – by offloading them to taxpayers who had nothing to do with the bad decisions in the first place but are now being forced, literally at gunpoint, to pay.
Just as it was in the United States.
“My view is that it would be suicidal for Madrid to use the rescue fund. The moment they pick up the phone and start talking about this, it is the end of any remaining hope for the single currency. Spain’s government just has to put on a brave face, pay the higher yields, and hope for the best,” he said.

When you have a big gun pointed at the other guy’s head, why would you put on a “brave face”?
The banksters didn’t here in the United States – they literally threatened Congress!
Why would it be different this time?
Best-a-luck Douche-Bank.











