Archive for September 22nd, 2010
Why The Fed's Policies WILL Collapse The Economy
“And you need not go further than one of our stores on midnight at the end of the month. And it’s real interesting to watch, about 11 p.m., customers start to come in and shop, fill their grocery basket with basic items, baby formula, milk, bread, eggs,and continue to shop and mill about the store until midnight, when electronic — government electronic benefits cards get activated and then the checkout starts and occurs. And our sales for those first few hours on the first of the month are substantially and significantly higher.
“And if you really think about it, the only reason somebody gets out in the middle of the night and buys baby formula is that they need it, and they’ve been waiting for it. Otherwise, we are open 24 hours — come at 5 a.m., come at 7 a.m., come at 10 a.m. But if you are there at midnight, you are there for a reason.”
This is why it can’t work folks.
In a credit-driven monetary system, you can only get “inflation” (in the truest sense, where it flows through to wages and prices, thereby debasing – that is, helping – people pay down indebtedness) if there is credit expansion.
But when the limit of credit expansion is reached (which is known – when “QE” by whatever name is initiated, you’ve reached that point, as you are then artificially trying to create credit expansion that you are unable to stimulate otherwise) further machinations of this sort do nothing other than bankrupt the population.
That is, there is no flow-through to wages. Price for essentials go up (energy, food, diapers, etc) but earnings capacity in real after-tax dollars decreases instead of increasing as occurs in a true inflationary environment.
You’ve all seen this. The 2qt Ice Cream tub is now 1.5qts. Price inflation. But your paycheck hasn’t gone up 25% to compensate.
The upper middle class and above is “unhurt” by this. Oh sure, they feel the pinch too, but in the broader sense it doesn’t do much damage to them, in that they still have surplus. So long as you have surplus, you’re “ok” in the general sense (you might not like it, but you at least can put gas in the car and food in your kid’s mouth!)
The working person, and especially the lower-middle class and below, are decimated by these sorts of policies.
Because capital formation is destroyed by ZIRP, these people have no job opportunities. Without capital formation there are no new businesses formed to create jobs. Without that employment there is no income to spend. The price-cram inflation that manufacturers try to hide with quantity games and similar doesn’t matter, as your baby still poops the same number of diapers, so if you get six less in a package, you need to buy more packages. The price-per is what matters, not the price on the wrapper, and your income goes down.
We can’t stabilize the labor market until we shut off the ZIRP tap. We cannot export our wage deflation to China, because it winds up reflecting here and destroys the capability for Americans to earn a decent wage. At the same time despite claims of “zero inflation” food, energy and other essentials continue to skyrocket in price.
If you doubt this problem is real go to a WalMart in any major city on the last day of the month around 11:00 in the evening. Hang around for an hour. Notice who’s in there and who goes for the checkstand when the clock ticks over.
These folks know better than anyone, due to their superior IT technology and ability to track sales down to the UPC, along with time of the sale and who’s buying, exactly what’s going on. When they tell you people are so broke they can’t afford a package of diapers until the “magic card” with “government cheese” turns back on at 12:01, you better listen. They’re not BSing you.
I’ve written on this for three years, and have pointed out that debasing the dollar will not help – it will in fact destroy the middle class and below instead. We got a short reprieve from the dollar debasement occasioned by the equity collapse in 2008 and early 09, but now we’re in the phase where instead of engendering support for the stock market a dollar decline will crash valuations instead.
Competitive devaluation cannot work, as we do not control the world. When we do it the rest of the world will respond by doing the same thing. All we do is tighten the vise – actual help for the population is not in the offing from these policies. “Begger Thy Neighbor” – exactly what we are attempting to do now - was a big part of why The Depression lasted 10 years, and it is also a big part of why it ended in a World War.
Nothing has changed folks. I said in 2007 that the only way out of this was to pull liquidity and force the bankrupt to take their medicine, whether we wanted to do it or not. It doesn’t matter if the rich and powerful banksters “think” this is a bad idea, mathematically it is not possible to inflate out of this, nor to stabilize the economy with ZIRP and QE. All we’ve done is enable the federal government to temporarily paper over the insolvency of half the population (and all of the major banks) by borrowing and spending 12% of GDP, building in even more damage that now has to be corrected and ensuring that even more pain must be suffered.
The big banking sham and how the recession is over for the top 1 percent – Top 1 percent of banks control 80 percent of banking assets while household net worth is down $12.3 trillion from the peak.
The headlines read that the recession is over. In fact, the recession has been deemed over since June of 2009 by the National Bureau of Economic and Research (NBER). Yet the fact of the matter is working and middle class Americans are solidly in a deep recession. There was a town hall that was televised where a Wall Street “worker” was telling the President that he was tired of being treated like a “piñata” because Wall Street is directly linked to Main Street. It is not. Wall Street has turned into a giant vampire leech that is sucking every ounce of productivity out of the real economy. The big banks have grown bigger yet unemployment remains elevated near peak levels. The net worth of Americans is still over $12 trillion below the peak reached only a few years ago. Home values are still in the dumps. Why is the recession over? Because GDP has grown and other random indicators that really just pertain to the top 1 percent.
The FDIC has interesting data on the banking system. They tell us that we have close to 7,800 banks in the U.S. but the asset break down is really as unbalanced as it can get:
Source: FDIC
105 banks (about 1 percent of the total banks in the U.S.) control close to 80 percent of all banking assets in the U.S. The top 105 banks control over $10.3 trillion in assets. Keep in mind banks can call things assets like commercial real estate loans and questionable real estate loans as well. The FDIC backs this system up with an insolvent reserve fund. All it would take is one of the bigger banks to fail to cause the system to shut down. Of course, this wouldn’t happen because the FDIC has a $500 billion lifeline to the U.S. Treasury just in case this should happen.
As we move forward and forward it is becoming more apparent that Wall Street and Main Street especially with our current banking structure have completely opposite motives. Big banks are pushing capital wherever it can go for cheap labor, less regulation, and frankly less law to game the system. Keep in mind the money they are using right now is backed by taxpayer dollars. Many of these banks would be sitting with Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers if we were to follow a free market approach but they are corporate welfare recipients and have pushed their propaganda out to Main Street. Yet public sentiment has now shifted. Many now don’t believe in these real estate and stock fantasies.
First let us look at some metrics to see how healthy the economy is today.
(Un)Employment
Take a look at the above chart. Does it look like the employment market is better? It is clearly not. In fact, the unemployment rate is near the peak since the recession supposedly ended last year. It is apparent that someone with no job is not growing their income. That is why we now have 43 million Americans in poverty and this number has grown throughout the entire recession. Many of these people fell out of the middle class category. If we are not in recession then we must be in growth at least by a strict definition. Yet who is growing here?
Big banks grow
The too big to fail banks are growing while the banking system consolidates. In fact, as of Q2 of 2009 when the recession was marked as over we had 8,195 banks in the U.S. Today we have 7,830 which signify 365 fewer banks. Yet total assets remain steady. What has occurred is the too big to fail have gotten bigger with their government lifelines. The banking system is becoming even more inherently dangerous in terms of setting up for another crisis. If too big to fail is an issue, then why make these banks even bigger? The top 1 percent controls much of the financial wealth in the U.S. and right now they are protecting their own.
Small time investors flee stock market
Maybe small time investors have jumped back into the stock market?
Source: NY Times
In fact, the few working and middle class investors that do have money are rushing into safer products if they even have extra money to invest. The money flowing out of stocks has gone one way. Right now Wall Street is one giant casino for the wealthy and people are waking up. The attempt is lure back in more sucker money so they can then off load their junk to more suckers (think of subprime, CDOs, and all that other waste). By the time retail investors bought into the propaganda from the get rich quick Wall Street it was too late and they were left holding the bucket. This is how Wall Street plays the game through investment banks. Right now no actual real wealth is being created. In fact, with days like the flash crash in May a trillion dollars in paper money was wiped out in one day for a few hours. Basically half of the yearly GDP of California was shed in a few hours of trading. There is a big disconnect from Wall Street and Main Street. The fact that economists are claiming this recession over when we have:
-26 million unemployed or underemployed Americans
-43 million Americans in poverty
-The median household income under $50,000 (stagnant for over 15 years in real terms)
-Home values near their trough
-Household net worth down $12.3 trillion from the peak
Yet GDP is growing? If the working and middle class aren’t getting any more of the pie, who is?
Houston, We Have A New Problem (Dollar)
Bernanke managed to create a confirmatory signal yesterday in the dollar, which isn’t exactly what I’d call “good news”
It would be nice if these clowns would pay attention to the consequences of their acts. That, of course, would require that they cared, and I’m quite convinced they do not.
The target on this, assuming it’s valid, is ~72ish, a roughly 10% devaluation.
Now here’s the problem with that, and I hope Bernanke (and Obama) are paying attention: with the bond market having rates at record lows, especially in the 2yr and shorter duration, anyone now buying these instruments as a foreign interest is now doing so only if they believe in the stability of the currency.
If that turns out to not be the case those foreign buyers are going to get fisted on the FX devaluation.
The worse news is that Treasury has been shortening duration of the US Debt in an attempt to control interest expense. This is the sort of insanity that only a drug addict could love – taking actions that provide more of a “boost” to whatever you’re doing irrespective of the potential risks - in this case, rollover risk.
We are in fact running a gigantic Asian stimulus policy here in the United States. It is not working in the United States and can’t because we destroyed our manufacturing base here and we have destroyed the incentives for capital formation through ZIRP and now explicit statements from The Fed that it will ignore the law governing its operations and redefine its mandate in violation of said law.
Specifically, from the Statement yesterday:
Measures of underlying inflation are currently at levels somewhat below those the Committee judges most consistent, over the longer run, with its mandate to promote maximum employment and price stability. With substantial resource slack continuing to restrain cost pressures and longer-term inflation expectations stable, inflation is likely to remain subdued for some time before rising to levels the Committee considers consistent with its mandate.
The Federal Reserve doesn’t have that discretion. The actual Federal Reserve Act says price stability, not “price inflation.”
An “in your face” statement that The Federal Reserve will attempt to create inflation – intentionally – is tantamount to a declaration of willful and intentional violation of the law.
The market reacted to this, as you would expect it to – it looked beyond the black letter of the statement to the implications, and reminded itself that the last time The Fed went “rogue” was in the 1970s, and the result was double-digit price inflation.
The reaction in the dollar and gold was immediate and violent – and with good reason, given history.
Industry will react to this too – by avoiding it. As a consequence we will find that not only has capital formation been destroyed by ZIRP but in addition avoidance of devaluation risk will continue to drive investment and capital overseas, further eviscerating labor (and wages) here in The United States.
Don’t expect Obama or Congress to show up with a sack sufficient to step on Bernanke’s neck for this crap, and as a consequence, do expect that absent some sort of very violent reaction in the equity markets to drive people into dollars (as the “safe haven”) that downside target is not only like to be met, it is likely to be exceeded.
The game is afoot.
1920: The Great Depression That Wasn't
The Panic of 1920 started out as a contender for the greatest depression of all time, with a drop in prices and production during its first twelve months that dwarfed those of any other economic crash, and she piled on an unemployment rate that skyrocketed from invisible to 12% in a flash. Ignoring calls to do something, anything, to “help”, Washington, DC simply allowed the economy to adjust wherever it chose to go. In tandem, Federal Reserve officials looked upon the rapid deflation in prices not with horror but with a declaration of its necessity. Yet, despite the lack of government intervention and monetary “pump-priming”, the economy corrected itself within two years. As a modern day American, I can hardly imagine.
Prior to the denouement, the Fed money spigot had been on full blast for seven years; an index of wholesale prices had surged from a base of 100 in 1913 to 226 in early 1920. One economist from the time noted a concurrent “outbreak of speculation in business and stock market circles that for recklessness has had few parallels”.
The storm broke in May of 1920 and arrived as these things usually do – almost everyone at the opera was caught napping when the lights suddenly came on. Bank failures, which numbered 63 in 1919, spiked to 506 by 1921. By June of the latter year, the money supply had dropped 9%, GNP 17%, and the index of wholesale prices collapsed from 247 in May of 1920 to 141 by July of 1921. To this day, the index has yet to show a more precipitous drop in such a short time.
Across America, the suffering began.
The prevailing opinion on the proper response was summed up in Warren G. Harding’s speech as he accepted the 1920 Republican presidential nomination. He pledged an “intelligent and courageous deflation, and (to) strike at the government borrowing which enlarges the evil”. He was a man of his word. Between 1920 and 1922, the federal budget fell by almost one half, tax receipts by 38%, and outstanding debt by 5%. Meanwhile, Federal Reserve officials made no attempt to maintain prices at any level.
With prices allowed to adjust, the recovery was already underway by August of 1921. Between then and 1923 manufacturing production in the US rose 48% while unemployment declined to 2.4%. The depression of 1920 was notable not only for its quick turnaround but also for its absence of political and monetary intervention. In many ways it was to be the curtain call for American laissez faire; to read of 1920 today sounds not only of another time but of another country altogether.
Today there are more fish swimming the Sahara Desert than people in DC who would dare utter such things as Warren G. Harding once spoke. If President Obama called for “intelligent and courageous deflation” he’d be tossed into the Time Out Corner with Ron Paul and derided as a lunatic. Yet, the short-lived Panic of 1920 suggests that there may be other options available than just more inflation and debt – that we can seek economic recovery by doing absolutely nothing, by allowing our much ballyhooed free market for once to be just that – free.
Harding’s depression, one of far greater initial ferocity than 1929, lasted barely two years. In contrast a meddling Herbert Hoover passed a fat and healthy depression to FDR, who nurtured, loved, and stuffed it to bursting with the New Deal. Why don’t we try Harding’s response? He has the far better track record.
Instead, today our Fed officials artificially set their fund rate at zero – during a time of extreme economic distress – then wonder why nobody is willing to lend, all in a misguided effort to ward off falling prices for all, bankruptcy for the insolvent, and to keep money “cheap”. I believe that it is not money that lubricates an economy, but prices. Prices are the clearing mechanism that moves goods and services efficiently. Break down the price mechanism – and constant political and monetary interventions are an excellent way to do so – and you can have all the money supply that trees can provide and it will do nothing of any benefit.
While we may look upon Fed officials from 1920 as ignorant oafs who did not understand monetary policy (and so failed to “re-inflate” prices), we fail to consider that in our response we might have it wrong. This is not a knock on the modern day American economist; forgetting to remember something important is nothing new. A group of economists remarked in 1937 on “the melancholy fact that each generation must relearn the fundamental principles of money in the bitter school of experience”. Yet, while our faulty memory is tragic, to me a far greater defect within us has been revealed by the current economic trauma.
Once upon a time, our forefathers stormed ashore at Normandy into the teeth of German machinegun fire with nothing between them and Heaven but a khaki shirt; while today far too many of us tremble at the mere thought of our largest banks and other institutions collapsing into their well-deserved bankruptcy. To me, this fear of taking our medicine is the saddest spectacle of all. While that Greatest Generation fought Hitler’s Wehrmacht so that we, their descendants, would never have to, today we are sticking our descendents with trillion dollar bailout bills for fear of our well-earned comeuppance.
What will future generations say of us?
CJ Maloney lives and works in New York City. His first book “Like Moving Into Heaven: Arthurdale, West Virginia and the New Deal” will be published February 2011 by John Wiley & Sons. The views and opinions expressed are those of the author and do not reflect those of the publisher or the author’s employer. He may be contacted at: peloponny1@aol.com











