Donate
Freedom isn't free!
Please help stay online.


Gear

Get Your Official FedUpUSA Gear Today!

FedUpUSA Gear

Get your TSA Not On Board Sign Stand Up For Your 4th Amendment Rights
In The Media

FedUpUSA YouTube Channel

The FedUpUSA Video

FedUpUSA Bear Stearns Protest Video

Karl Denninger on Dylan Ratigan 11/17/11

Karl Denninger on Dylan Ratigan 10/04/11

Karl Denninger on Fox Business 03/28/11

Stephanie Jasky at the National Constitution Center Civility In Democracy 03/26/11

FedUpUSA on Dylan Ratigan MSNBC 10/19/2010

FedUpUSA on Dylan Ratigan 10/7/2010

Stephanie Jasky's Interview With the UK Guardian How The Tea Party Movement Began 10/5/10

Karl Denninger on CNBC 7/9/2009

Karl Denninger on Glenn Beck 8/21/2008

FedUpUSA Co-Founder and Coordinator of the Washington DC Toilet Bowl Protest interviewed by the AP

FedUpUSA Founder Stephanie Jasky interviewed on Plains Radio

FedUpUSA Founder Stephanie Jasky's article 912 Protest Washington DC - What Was It All About? as seen on The Right Side of Life
The Law Show

Sundays @ 11:00 AM Eastern on WJR
Helping Homeowners In Michigan

The Law Show
Categories
Calendar
November 2010
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  

Archive for November 5th, 2010

Bank of America: It's Just a Flesh Wound

 

Riiiight…..all these foreclosure problems are merely paperwork snafus.  Nothing to see here.  Move along.

From the BAC 10-Q:

 The Corporation and affiliates, legacy Countrywide entities and affiliates, and legacy Merrill Lynch entities and affiliates have been named as defendants in a number of cases relating to various roles they played in MBS offerings. These cases are generally purported class action suits or actions by individual purchasers of securities. Although the allegations vary by lawsuit, these cases generally allege that the offering documents for more than $375 billion of securities issued by hundreds of securitization trusts contained material misrepresentations and omissions, including statements regarding the underwriting standards pursuant to which the underlying mortgage loans were issued, the ratings given to the tranches by rating agencies, and the appraisal standards that were used in violation of Section 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and/or state securities laws. The cases generally allege unspecified compensatory damages and in some instances, seek rescission. The Corporation has previously disclosed some of these matters under other headings, in its 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010, including Countrywide Mortgage-Backed Securities Litigation; IndyMac Litigation; Merrill Lynch Subprime-related Matters; and Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle Litigation.

We recently temporarily suspended our foreclosure sales nationally to conduct an assessment of our foreclosure processes. Subsequently, numerous state and federal investigations of alleged irregularities in foreclosure processes across our industry have been initiated. We have incurred liabilities and are facing additional claims from GSEs and monolines related to representations and warranties and we may face similar claims from private-label RMBS investors which, if successful, could result in significant repurchase obligations.

smiley

Yeah, it’s all under control….$375 billion is apparently a trivial amount to the banksters when they know they can have Ben Bernanke extort money from the US taxpayer to cover up their little problem.  Meanwhile, Bank of America will foreclose on your home.

Share

Americans On Foodstamps Hits New Record In August, Increase By Over Half A Million To 42.4 Million, 17% Increase Year Over Year

 

Another highlight you may not hear in the President’s address from this morning: according to the last Department of Agriculture update, Americans on foodstamps has increased by over half a million in August, hitting a fresh all time high of 42.4 million people relying on the government for basis sustenance. At least now we know where that labor force is going. The August number is a 17% rise from the same time a year ago. That number is up 58.5% from August 2007, before the recession began.

As the WSJ reports:

By population, Washington, D.C. had the largest share of residents receiving food stamps: More than a fifth, 21.1%, of its residents collected assistance in August. Washington was followed by Mississippi, where 20.1% of residents received food stamps, and Tennessee, where 20% tapped into the government nutrition program.

Idaho posted the largest jump in recipients in the past year. The number of people receiving food stamps climbed 38.8% but their rolls are still fairly low. Just 211,883 Idaho residents collected food stamps in August.

The average benefit size per person nationwide in August was $133.90. Per household it was $287.82.

Food stamps have become a lifeline for workers who have lost their jobs, particularly among the growing share of unemployed Americans who have also exhausted their unemployment benefits. Lines at grocers at midnight on the first of the month have signaled that, in many cases, those benefits aren’t tiding families over and they run out before their next check kicks in.

Even during the summer children returned to schools to take advantage of free lunch programs where they were available. Nearly 195 million lunches were dished out in August and 58.9% of them were free. Another 8.4% were available at reduced prices. That number will surge when the fall data are released because children will be back in school. Last September, for example, more than 590 million lunches were served, nearly 64% of which were free or reduced price.

Children whose families have incomes at or below 130% of the poverty level — $28,665 for a family of four — can access free meals. Those families earning between 130% and 185% of the poverty level — $40,793 for a four-person family — are eligible for reduced-price meals that can’t cost more than 40 cents.

We also fail to see just what Fed-induced wealth effect these 42.4 million Americans will receive courtesy of the Fed’s generosity targetting Wall Street, corporate insiders, and nobody else.

ZeroHedge

Share

We Can't Let You See How They Robbed You!

 

If there was a God, he would have given this jackass a stroke on uttering this bilge:

Nov. 5 (Bloomberg) — The European Central Bank refused to disclose internal documents showing how Greece used derivatives to hide its government debt because of the “acute” risk of roiling markets, President Jean-Claude Trichet said.

Got it?

We can’t let anyone see how Greece hid their debt.  We can’t let the people know how the fraud was done.  We certainly can’t name the people involved and outline the derivative scams that were used, lest other people look for more of them (gee, you think?) or even worse, hold us to account for intentionally ignoring them ourselves.

That’s what you were told this morning folks.

“The information contained in the two documents would undermine the public confidence as regards the effective conduct of economic policy prove that we actively conspired with those who ripped off investors and deceived the markets” Trichet wrote in an Oct. 21 letter in which he rejected the appeal. Disclosure “bears, in the current very vulnerable market environment, the substantial and acute risk of adding to volatility and instability.”

Fixed it for ‘ya.

“The ECB, the European Commission and Eurostat need to show that they are aware of all the transactions and that they have no issue in disclosing them. The market has been left to think the worst.”

They were aware of them.  They actively conspired in them!

Greece’s fiscal crisis turned attention to off-market swaps arranged by Goldman Sachs that allowed the country to hide the extent of its debt from 2000 onwards. The Goldman Sachs swaps, signed in 2000 and 2001, reduced the country’s foreign-denominated debt in euro terms by 2.37 billion euros and lowered debt as a proportion of GDP to 103.7 percent from 105.3 percent, according to a Feb. 21 statement by Goldman Sachs. Greece told Eurostat that the other swaps were significantly smaller than the Goldman Sachs agreements, according to the EU agency.

Oh, Goldman again.

Gee, why am I not surprised?

Discussio (registration required to post)
 
Share

Heh, Look – It's Lootie The Bankster!

 

If you’re wondering why loan mods appear to be intentionally blown off, why banksters advise people to intentionally miss payments to get a mod and then don’t deliver one, foreclosing instead, you only need to look right here:

3.12 Realization on defaulted mortgage loans CitiMortgage will use its best efforts, consistent with its customary servicing procedures, to foreclose upon or otherwise comparably convert the ownership of properties securing any mortgage loans that continue in default and as to which no satisfactory arrangements can be made for collection of delinquent payments pursuant to section 3.2. Consistent with the foregoing, CitiMortgage will use reasonable efforts to realize upon defaulted mortgage loans in a manner that will maximize the receipt of principal and interest by the certificate holders, taking into account, among other things, the timing of foreclosure proceedings.

If a deficiency action is available against the mortgagor or any other person, CitiMortgage may proceed for the deficiency. CitiMortgage may retain 25% of the net proceeds received from a mortgagor pursuant to a deficiency action as compensation for proceeding with the deficiency action.

Got that?

Citibank’s PSA – the Pooling and Servicing Agreement – the document that specifies what they will do as a servicer if you default on your mortgage says that they will maximize the the amount of money they can get from you.

In fact it requires that they maximize the amount of money they can get from you.

It gets better.

The Servicer – that is, Citi – gets to keep 25% of anything they get from a deficiency action.

That’s a hell of a lot of money.

If you were wondering why HAMP is not helping, it’s because the contracts the banks have with the mortgage security holders say that they must act in a way that screws you out of the maximum amount of money possible if you default, and even better, if you default, they foreclose and then are able to come after you in a deficiency action, they get to keep 25% of the money.

Yeah.

Guess what: I’ll bet my last nickel that Geithner knew this full well when they put together the fraudulent program called “HAMP”, and that the very design of it – requiring you to default first before you could get help – was put in that program specifically to enable these clauses to be exercised.

Yet another example of the banks robbing you.

H/t Reggie Middleton’s BoomBustBlog

Discussion (registration required to post)
 
Share
Twitter
Follow Us

FedUpUSA Twitter

Networked Blogs
Forum
FedUpUSA Supports
FedUpUSA
proudly supports:

Get Adobe Flash player
Calen Fretts
for US Congress
Florida District 1

Kerry Bentivolio for Congress
Kerry Bentivolo
for Congress
Michigan 11th District

Order
Tools and Resources
No More National Debt

By Bill Still
There is only one answer for the world economic situation; monetary reform.
1. No More National Debt
2. No More Fractional Lending


A New Economic Game: "The Truth"

Filling in the Pieces
PDF PowerPoint

Congressional Patriots

Federal Reserve Balance Sheet

Paulson's Lies

Bernanke's Lies

FedUpUSA Archive

Mathematics of Failure

Media Kit

Door Hanger

Corruption Flier

Bank Flier

Made In America A list of products and services made right here in the USA. Choosing to buy American made products preserves and creates American jobs.