Archive for January 11th, 2011
Two Americas: Too Big To Fails Are Gorging On Bailout Funds While The Rest Of America Suffers
Two Americas: 12 Facts That Show That Those Who Are Too Big To Fail Are Thriving On The Bailout Money That Our Politicians Gave Them Even As The Economic Suffering Of Ordinary Americans Continues To Deepen
Most Americans have a deep aversion to the phrase “redistribution of wealth”, and rightly so. On a fundamental level, it is just not right to take the money that one man has worked so hard to earn and “redistribute” it to someone else. In the political realm, the phrase “a redistribution of wealth” is usually a reference to our ballooning social programs, but what most Americans don’t realize is that one of the biggest redistributions of wealth in world history took place during the Wall Street bailouts of a couple years ago. Trillions of dollars of our money and of money that belongs to future generations was redistributed to the Wall Street bankers. The Wall Street bankers did not earn this money and they did not deserve this money. We were told that if Wall Street did not get this money that the global economy would collapse and that there would be martial law in the streets. We were promised that this money would “fix” Wall Street and then the prosperity would “trickle down” to Main Street. So did this happen? Of course not.
What ended up happening is that Wall Street hoarded all of this cash. Lending to individuals and small businesses actually decreased. The Federal Reserve started handing out gigantic piles of nearly interest-free money which many of these big Wall Street banks immediately loaned back to the U.S. government at a significantly higher rate of interest.
Talk about easy money.
Now the big Wall Street banks and the ultra-wealthy are swimming in cash and sales of luxury goods in the United States are absolutely skyrocketing. Meanwhile, millions of “ordinary” Americans continue to slip into poverty.
So is the answer to all of this just to “tax the rich” and redistribute the wealth again by giving more handouts to the poor?
Of course not.
The American people don’t need more handouts.
What the American people desperately need are some good jobs.
But Wall Street is hoarding the cash they got during the bailouts.
It would be one thing if these big Wall Street banks had made a ton of money based on their own efforts. It is a very American thing to be able to enjoy the fruits of hard work.
However, the truth is that many big Wall Street banks and financial institutions may have completely imploded if not for the bailouts.
They were “too big to fail” and our politicians jumped to their service.
Our politicians redistributed wealth by taking trillions of dollars that belonged to us and to future generations and handed it to the folks on Wall Street.
So now the boys and girls over on Wall Street are thriving while tens of millions of “average” Americans are desperately suffering.
Does that seem right to you?
Isn’t it about time that the U.S. government gets out of the “redistribution of wealth” business altogether?
Just consider the following statistics. Even as the economic suffering of ordinary Americans continues to deepen, those who got big piles of bailout money are living the high life….
#1 According to Stephen Lewis of Monument Securities, luxury retailers in the United States have seen an 8.1 percent increase in sales compared to a year ago, while “discount stores” that cater to the poor and the middle class have only seen a 1.2 percent increase in sales compared to a year ago.
#2 The sad truth is that just about every company that deals in luxury goods is booming, while those that primarily serve ordinary Americans are not doing nearly as well. Just consider the following quote from a recent article by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard of the Telegraph….
Tiffany’s, Nordstrom, and Saks Fifth Avenue are booming. Sales of Cadillac cars have jumped 35pc, while Porsche’s US sales are up 29pc.
Cartier and Louis Vuitton have helped boost the luxury goods stock index by almost 50pc since October. Yet Best Buy, Target, and Walmart have languished.
#3 Elderly Americans in particular are really having a hard time of it right now. A recent study by a law professor from the University of Michigan found that Americans that are 55 years of age or older now account for 20 percent of all bankruptcies in the United States. Back in 2001, they only accounted for 12 percent of all bankruptcies.
#4 The number of Americans on food stamps has hit another all-time record. There are now 43.2 million Americans enrolled in the food stamp program.
#5 According to the U.S. Conference of Mayors, visits to soup kitchens are up 24 percent over the past year.
#6 Meanwhile, the price of food continues to go up. This hits poor and middle class Americans much harder than it hits the wealthy. According to a report on 55 top food commodities by the Food and Agriculture Organization, global food prices reached a new record high during December.
#7 Lester Brown, the president of the Washington-based Earth Policy Institute, is publicly declaring that the world is just “one poor harvest” away from total chaos….
“The reality is that the world is only one poor harvest away from chaos. We are so close to the edge that politically destabilizing food prices could come at any time.”
#8 The price of clothes is also increasing dramatically. It turns out that cotton is 80% more expensive now than it was back at the beginning of 2010.
#9 Americans will also be paying more at the gas pump this upcoming year. In fact, former Shell Oil President John Hofmeister recently stated that Americans could be paying 5 dollars for a gallon of gasoline by the end of this upcoming year.
#10 Health insurance rates are also skyrocketing. Blue Shield of California recently announced plans to raise health insurance rates by an average of 30% to 35% this year, and some individual policy holders could actually see their health insurance premiums rise by a whopping 59 percent.
#11 On top of everything else, the U.S. Census is now telling us that there are millions more poor people in America than they had previously calculated. The U.S. Census Bureau recently revealed that the figure of 43.6 million Americans living in poverty that they announced last September was way too low and that actually 47.8 million Americans are now living in poverty.
#12 If all of these economic problems were not bad enough, now many state and local governments are seriously considering raising taxes. In Illinois, there is now a proposal to raise state income tax rates by 75 percent. A recent article that appeared on the CNBC website explained why Illinois is so desperate for cash….
In a moment when states around the country are wrestling with withered revenues, Illinois faces a deficit of at least $13 billion; more than $6 billion in unpaid bills to social service agencies, schools and funeral homes; the most underfinanced state pension system; and growing signs of concern from bond investors.
So won’t the big Wall Street banks and the ultra-wealthy get hit by these tax increases too?
Some of them will, but many of them have learned to “play the game” so well that they barely pay any taxes at all.
As I have written about previously, a third of all the wealth in the world is now held in offshore banks. When taxes go up, the ultra-wealthy are not the ones that have their wealth “redistributed”. Instead, it is poor saps like you and I that have our wealth “redistributed”.
In fact, the next time another “financial crisis” comes along, the financial “powers that be” will once again come running to Congress and come running to the Federal Reserve begging for more bailouts.
Now that the precedent has been set, it will only seem natural to redistribute even more of our wealth to the folks over on Wall Street so that we can “save” the financial system.
But the truth is that our financial system is completely doomed to fail in the long run and throwing our money into the financial system is like throwing our money into a black hole.
In the end, all of us are going to greatly suffer when the financial system finally crashes. But for the moment the wealthy are partying with all of the money that they have looted from the rest of America, and the rest of us which were “small enough to fail” have been left to scratch and claw and fight with each other as we desperately try to survive in this horrible economy.
Massachusetts Court Decision with Potential To Turn Back the Foreclosure Tsunami
Now even the media is catching onto the implications of the Massachusetts Supreme Court decision. This one isn’t going to be ignored, folks.
Massachusetts Court Decision with Potential To Turn Back the Foreclosure Tsunami
The decision in the court in Massachusetts threatens to unravel the illegal way in which many homeowners have been forced from their homes while federal and state agencies have stood by and turned a blind eye. This case has sparked fear in the holders of those mortgage backed securities and those investment banks that perpetrated those Ponzi Schemes. Here in N.J. a similar case is also pending with the lawyers for Wells Fargo and others trying to scramble to stop it. Here is the latest update:
Massachusetts’ highest court has issued a decision in a case we reported yesterday, slamming the Wall Street banks’ mortgage securitization/foreclosure scam, which goes back to the 1990s and caused a devastating real estate blowout and 8 million home foreclosures in recent years. Of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling today, Georgetown Law expert Prof. Adam Levitin said, “The case is enough to put a serious cloud on [mortgage] title through the whole system, and that’s a problem, challenging the way mortgages were bundled and sold worldwide.” By serving as a precedent for other state supreme courts, the ruling could create a serious barrier against the massive waves of foreclosures by which the big banks and Wall Street investment firms have been enriching themselves.
As LPAC reported Jan. 6, “the Supreme Judicial Court in Boston will issue a ruling as to whether foreclosures in the state should be completely undone because securitization “industry” practices violate real estate law governing how mortgages may be transferred. This case could have global ramifications.” The case involved just two foreclosures — one by Wells Fargo, the other by US Bancorp — but potentially may apply to millions nationwide.
Today the Court found, in a decision by Justice Ralph D. Gants, “We agree with the [lower court] judge that the plaintiffs, who were not the original mortgagees, failed to make the required showing that they were the holders of the mortgages at the time of foreclosure…. There must be proof that the assignment was made by a party that itself held the mortgage.” The decision ruled illegal, the foreclosure documentation practices which “securitization” has made into standard mass practice in Massachusetts and other states — transferring title to the foreclosing bank after it forecloses; transferring mortgage titles into a trust pool en blanc, or without any new owner being named; and skipping the county recordation of the transfer. “These blank mortgage assignments were never recorded and they were not legally recordable,” the Court found.
Moreover, the court did not limit its ruling to prospective effect; it also allowed it to be applied retroactively. So, many thousands of already completed foreclosures by these banks are voided, and can be challenged; title insurers may also have to pay up. The Cambridge attorney of one of the homeowners, Paul Collier, said the ruling reverts ownership of thousands of homes back to those who lost them, at least temporarily.
Elsewhere, the New York Supreme Court has given 30 banks until Jan. 19 to submit briefs and evidence as to why their foreclosures in that state “should not be found illegal.” The Kansas Supreme Court has found the banks’ Mortgage Electronic Registration System (MERS) to be “akin to a straw man”; and California and New Jersey have lower court decisions against the banks being appealed to higher courts.
But the possibility is also rumored, that Republicans in Congress will try to end-run the courts by a legislative act attempting to make MERS legal, retroactively. The Obama White House, reportedly, would back it.
and
Mass. High Court Ruling Means Foreclosure Mess Just Got Much Worse
Foreclosure-gate is back.
The Massachusetts Supreme Court has ruled against U.S. Bancorp and Wells Fargo in a case that could have serious implications for the already depressed U.S. housing market.
The high court found that the banks wrongfully sold two foreclosed homes by failing to show the proper paperwork at the time of the sale indicating they actually owned those homes and had the right to a) foreclose on those properties and b) sell the homes to new owners.
If this decision is echoed in other states, the foreclosure mess is going to get a whole lot messier.
There is already a huge backlog of potential home foreclosures sitting on banks’ books as a result of last year’s “robo-signing” scandal, which forced banks to undergo a self-imposed moratorium on foreclosure proceedings. It was expected that early this year these foreclosures would eventually go through and the problem would work itself out. (See: RealtyTrac: Foreclosures Drop in November But Will Come Roaring Back in 2011)
Now, the likelihood of that happening is much less.
In the wake of the court’s ruling, there may be increased scrutiny of deals already done. In addition, people may be less inclined to purchase a foreclosure property for fear that it might end in a repossession of the home.
Another freeze on foreclosures may be good for home prices in the short-term, but the long-term outlook seems more grim as RealtyTrac’s Rick Sharga told Tech Ticker last fall. About one-third of all sales are foreclosures sales, and a freezing up of related activity can’t help but create a “chilling effect” on the market.
It looks like housing market has a long way to go before it flushes this mess for good. For a more rosy take on the situation, see: Upside Surprise! Whitney Tilson Sees Silver Lining in Foreslosure-Gate








