Donate
Freedom isn't free!
Please help FedUpUSA stay online.


Pre-Order
Leverage
Gear

Get Your Official FedUpUSA Gear Today!

FedUpUSA Gear

Get your TSA Not On Board Sign Stand Up For Your 4th Amendment Rights
In The Media

FedUpUSA YouTube Channel

The FedUpUSA Video

FedUpUSA Bear Stearns Protest Video

Karl Denninger on Dylan Ratigan 11/17/11

Karl Denninger on Dylan Ratigan 10/04/11

Karl Denninger on Fox Business 03/28/11

Stephanie Jasky at the National Constitution Center Civility In Democracy 03/26/11

FedUpUSA on Dylan Ratigan MSNBC 10/19/2010

FedUpUSA on Dylan Ratigan 10/7/2010

Stephanie Jasky's Interview With the UK Guardian How The Tea Party Movement Began 10/5/10

Karl Denninger on CNBC 7/9/2009

Karl Denninger on Glenn Beck 8/21/2008

FedUpUSA Co-Founder and Coordinator of the Washington DC Toilet Bowl Protest interviewed by the AP

FedUpUSA Founder Stephanie Jasky interviewed on Plains Radio

FedUpUSA Founder Stephanie Jasky's article 912 Protest Washington DC - What Was It All About? as seen on The Right Side of Life
The Law Show

Sundays @ 11:00 AM Eastern on WJR
Helping Homeowners In Michigan

The Law Show
Categories
Calendar
January 2011
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Archive for January 19th, 2011

The Biggest Bank Robbery In History

 

“There are over 300 bank robberies in Boston every year.  And a one-square-mile neighborhood in Boston, called Charlestown, has produced more bank and armored car robbers than anywhere in the U.S.”

That line is from the recent movie “The Town” with Ben Affleck.  He played the character of a bank robber who wanted to quit but had to pull off one last job for the bosses before he could leave.  The movie got us thinking about other famous bank robbers: Jesse James, Willie Sutton, and Ben Bernanke.  That’s right, the Bernank.  The Fed has been literally stealing money from the savers of this country for the past two years with their zero interest rate policy and now quantitative easing strategy.  But unlike a traditional bank robbery where the bank is the victim,  this time the banks have been the recipient of the stolen money.   Sure, an argument could be made that in 2009, the economy was teetering and zero interest rates helped save the economy.  But now that many economic numbers and retail sales figures have improved dramatically, the justification for zero interest rates is not there anymore.

Up until recently, the banks have been enjoying a free ride at the savers expense.  The yield curve is at its steepest slope since 1977.  The spread between the US 2 year and 30 year is 400 bps while the 2-10 spread is 275 bps.  The plan was for that big fat spread to add up to big fat bank revenues (witness Citigroup 4Q net interest revenue of over $12 billion).  But just like most bank robberies, the plan usually goes wrong and the robbers  are caught by the cops.  This time the cops are the bond market.  Prices on treasuries dropped 13% in the 4Q of 2010.  This has wrecked havoc on the banks free money plan and we are now seeing this in the investment portfolio losses of the banks (witness State Street earnings report this morning where their revenue dropped 12% due to “investment portfolio repositioning”).

The Fed has outright stated that they want the stock market to go higher to help bring confidence back to the economy.  They are trying to force John Q. Public to take his money out of his 0% yielding savings account and pump it into riskier assets like stocks.  It appears for the past 5 months that their plan was going according to script.  But unlike the movie “The Town” which had a very good ending (we won’t spoil it for you here), we are not quite sure that the Bernank will enjoy his movie’s ending and neither will we.

by Joe Saluzzi of Themis Trading for ZeroHedge

Share

A Word of Advice to Financial Authorities

 

leadimage

Paris, France – Markets were closed in the USA yesterday. But the world didn’t stop turning. And we didn’t stop reckoning with it.

What we are reckoning with is the breakdown so big hardly anyone notices it. The model of a political economy set up in response to the industrial revolution is now worn out. Exhausted. Headed for the trash heap of history.

We’re not in the habit of giving advice here in The Daily Reckoning. Sure, we warned readers about the biggest threats to their finances in 30 years – the bubbles in tech stocks and then in housing. And sure, we urged them to buy what turned out to be the best investment they could have made – gold.

And yes, we criticized governments for doing all the wrong things. But urging them to do the right things would be both futile and earnest. Futility doesn’t bother us. But we can’t stand earnestness. Left unchecked it leads right to world improvement…and thence to Hell.

Still, in the spirit of civic betterment, today exceptionally, we offer a bit of advice to financial authorities all over the world. In a word:

Default!

When you have more debt than you can pay, it is always best to own up…default…hang your head…say you’re sorry…promise not to do it again…

…and go about your business. And do it as soon as possible.

Whence cometh this august advice? From the pages of history – recent…and not so recent.

In the second half of the 19th century, the Arab states borrowed heavily from Europeans. The Ottoman Empire was an anachronism. The modern state had already been developed by Napoleon and Bismarck. Meanwhile, in America, the War Between the States sealed the fate of the founding fathers’ republic. The limited government of Jefferson became the runaway military government of Lincoln…and later the all-powerful social welfare state of Franklin Roosevelt.

Back in the Old World, in the 19th century, modern technology gave Europeans a huge advantage over their neighbors. The Ottomans – who governed from the Balkans to Morocco – were being left behind. Their economies were less productive, so they lacked the tax base needed to sustain modern armies. So, they brought in European entrepreneurs and European capital to build railroads, canals and other improvements.

Then, as now, declining economies were supported by more dynamic ones.

“China’s lending hits new heights,” says a headline at The Financial Times today.

China has the most dynamic economy in the world…with $2.8 trillion in reserves, most of it in dollars. It is lending money all over the world. It is America’s biggest creditor. And now it is helping wobbly European nations go deeper into debt too.

Foreign money comes at a cost. When the Ottomans couldn’t pay, they tried austerity…and then borrowed more. The natives grew restless under the austerity measures. The debt grew larger too…as more and more money was needed to support previous borrowing.

Soon, there was no way out. Backed by better armies, the Europeans foreclosed. France’s general Bugeaud laid waste to Algeria’s fertile plains. Later, France found a pretext to invade Tunisia. Italy took Libya. Britain invaded Egypt. Soon, Europeans were in control of all of North Africa…and much of the Levant.

Lesson # 1 – don’t borrow from foreigners.

Lesson #2 – if you get into trouble, don’t borrow more from the foreigners. Default.

Next, it was the Europeans’ turn to be the borrowers. They got into a nasty, pointless war in 1914. The French borrowed from the English. The English borrowed from the Americans. The Germans couldn’t borrow, so they printed money.

Then, when the war was over…everybody waited to get paid. The Americans waited for the English to pay. The English waited for the French. And the French waited for the Germans. The Huns were supposed to pay reparations, but they were broke…so they printed more money. In the end, after many disasters, no one got paid…neither the Americans, nor the English, nor the French. Instead, they all suffered a worldwide depression and then another worldwide war.

Same lessons: if you can’t pay; don’t try; don’t pretend. Default.

And now the European states are in debt again. Not because of war, because of the social welfare system…aging populations…and bank debt. They cannot pay. So they try austerity measures and borrow more. The Chinese and Japanese are the latest benefactors.

In the US…the problem is similar. The government runs at a loss. Debt mounts up. The states implement austerity efforts; they have no choice. The central government, like Germany, prints money.

Now, both America and Europe are the Old World. Their social welfare model is failing. It was developed as a response to the needs of the nation state in the early days of the industrial revolution. It was suited to an era with expanding populations, fast-growing wealth, large pools of factory labor and almost unlimited resources. Governments needed to keep the urban masses under control. It was no good to provide them with security, insist that they obey the laws, and let it go at that. The politician that promised only a dollar’s worth of benefit for a dollar’s worth of taxes was soon replaced by one who promised to give back $1.20…or $1.50. In theory, this made perfect sense. Once government became recognized as the servant of the people, rather than their master, the people had a right to get their moneys’ worth. And then, why would anyone willingly submit to the authority of a government if it delivered no more than the citizen could get on his own? Why allow yourself to be forced to pay into the government’s social security program, for example, if it paid out no better than a private plan? Or, if the government’s health care system delivers no more or better service than you can get from private plans, what’s the point?

The promise of government’s social welfare projects was that they would take money from the few rich and the many as yet unborn in order to give it to poor and middle class voters. That is, voters thought they could get something for nothing. And, for a very long time, governments could deliver. They simply relied on the next wealthier, larger generation to make good on promises made to the previous one. It worked for 150 years. But now the next generations are often smaller. And maybe poorer. The old live longer. And there are more of them. The rich are too few to pay the bills. The rate of growth has slowed down. The return on additional inputs of debt have turned negative, while trillions in unpaid debt and commitments comes due.

Again, governments in the Old World have borrowed and promised too much. But rather than default honestly and openly, (forcing the people who lent imprudently to take the losses) they try to put the burden of the losses onto the innocent citizen…and the unenlightened investor.

He will pay higher taxes. He will get less in services. His money…his savings…his pension – all will be devalued by inflation. If he has stocks…they too will likely be sold off in the financial crises to come.

But let’s look at another, more recent example. Iceland.

You may remember, two years ago Iceland was a mess. Its banks had borrowed, lent, and speculated recklessly. Iceland’s feds squirmed and winced. At first, the government decided it would do what Ireland was doing. It would rescue the banks…that is, it would bail out the banks’ lenders with public funds.

But when the public caught on to what was going on, a referendum was held. Voters rejected the bailout as if they were voting against sin itself. More than 90% of voters cast ballots against a taxpayer bailout. We were impressed. We wrote about it. The “Patsy Revolt of 2009” we called it.

Unable to stick the voters with the losses, the government left the banks to default.

Was this the end of the world? Did Iceland slip below the North Atlantic waves…joining the Titanic on the chilly, dark bottom of the sea? Did commerce break down? Did the Icelandic money become worthless? Was this the “end of time”…the apocalypse forecast in the Bible?

Nope.

“Iceland is doing better than anyone could have hoped,” reports Bloomberg.

Inflation fell from 18% down to 5% last year. The cost of insuring Icelandic debt fell to less than a third of the price in early 2009. Unemployment is barely 6%.

“Thanks to its rescue plan,” says the IMF, “the recession in Iceland has been less deep than expected and not worse than in the other countries deeply affected.”

How did they achieve this? Are the Icelanders smarter than the Europeans?

Not exactly. They tried the typical dead-end solution. The trouble was, no one would lend Iceland more money. And once the public revolted, after realizing that it would be left holding the bag, the Icelandic feds had no choice. They had exhausted all the bad ideas. They were forced to go with a good one.

The foreign debt was consolidated into a few banks…which then went broke. The remaining banks were left intact, ready to keep the country’s financial machinery in business.

Lesson learned: got too much debt? Default quickly. Make it clean. Make it fast. Make it work.

There. That’s all the advice we’re going to give today. Any European or American government that would like more details could contact us on our mobile phone…if we had one.

Bill Bonner
for The Daily Reckoning

Share

Forged….Commercial Paper?!

 

Oh God, please no…..

Today, Qilu Bank is being investigated over a scandal allegedly involving $227m of forged commercial bank bills, used to provide short-term loans to business, and other forged commercial paper.

The lender, which is 20 per cent owned by Australia’s Commonwealth Bank, is based in Jinan, the capital of Shandong province, in northeast China.

Forged commercial paper?

FORGED?

This is a joke, right?

Who forges commercial paper?  Why someone who wants to pledge it in a repo or other operation, of course.  Otherwise there’s no point – if you claim to have it and really didn’t lend it, it’s a nothing, so why would you do it – except to deceive someone else up the line?

Yeah, $227 million isn’t much in the grand scheme of things.  But if in point of fact China now has a bunch of banks that are stuffed full of forged paper at this level, then who knows what other fun and games are going on behind the scenes that we’re not aware of.

There’s a terminal point in all bubbles, as we saw in the Housing Market, where people start cheating outright – not because they really want to, but because it’s the only way you can keep the Ponzi-like expansion of compounding going.  You run out of suckers when you can’t manage to entice anyone else to be stupid, so you do the only thing that’s left – you invent imaginary suckers.

This is the same terminal phase we saw with OptionArmZeroDownNinja loans made to straw buyers, and it’s the same phase we saw with Internet IPOs that had the word “Internet” on the face of the S1 and thus were worth an instant $300 a share the day of the offering – and $0.00 a year later.

Anyone who is still believing in the “Chinese Miracle” had better pay attention to this story – and do their diligence on whether it’s a “one-off” or is endemic of systemic problems that are starting to bubble to the surface.

If the latter – and I strongly suspect it is – we’re about to hear another big “pop” – this time in the East.

The Market-Ticker

Share

ECB Backs Off Rate Hikes; The Art of Buying Time

 

The Euro soared in conjunctions with a “successful” auction on Portugal (about 3.5% higher than German 10-Year Bonds) followed by comments from Trichet about rate hikes when the Euro was in a strenuously oversold condition.

Crashes come from oversold conditions, not overbought ones, and central bankers are well aware of it. Trichet got the reaction he wanted, now he attempts to “fine tune” investor expectations.

Please consider ECB Officials Retreat From Threat of Higher Rates

“The Governing Council of the ECB sees present interest rates as adequate,” council member Ewald Nowotny said at an event in Budapest yesterday. “We do not see a need for an interest rate change in the foreseeable future.” Bundesbank President Axel Weber also said he expects inflation to remain below the ECB’s 2 percent limit in the medium term, softening his language on the risks to price stability.

“It looks like the ECB is now trying to fine-tune market expectations,” said Laurent Bilke, global head of inflation strategy at Nomura International in London, who used to work as a forecaster at the ECB. “The market didn’t get the ECB completely right, but at the same time policy makers will not be successful in telling the market that there hasn’t been a shift in the policy stance.”

The euro has risen five cents against the dollar since ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet last week warned that the central bank will act if needed to contain inflation risks, which he said “could move to the upside.” Nowotny joins Athanasios Orphanides of Cyprus in suggesting markets may have over-reacted to the comments.

‘One-Sided’ Interpretation

“I think the statements of President Trichet at the last press conference have been perhaps interpreted in a rather one- sided way,” Nowotny said. Orphanides said in an interview published on Jan. 17 that the ECB’s policy statement was not “overly hawkish” and there is sometimes an “overreaction to the underlying message.”

ECB officials “are trying to dampen rate expectations that have increased after Trichet’s comments,” said Jacques Cailloux, chief European economist at Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc in London. “The market did overreact.”

A stronger currency could undermine European exports just as the euro region grapples with a sovereign debt crisis that’s forced governments to cut spending, damping the outlook for economic growth. Higher ECB rates would also increase the burden on debt-strapped nations. The central bank has held its benchmark interest rate at a record low of 1 percent since May 2009.

Weber said in a speech in Frankfurt yesterday that while inflation risks “could increase,” they are still “more or less balanced” and prices should remain contained in the medium term. Last week, he said risks to the medium-term inflation outlook “could well move to the upside.”

The euro surged after on the comments and Citigroup Inc. immediately revised its forecast for the ECB’s first rate increase to the second half of this year from the first quarter of 2012.

Trichet Has No Credibility

Trichet has violated everything he has ever stood for when he bought sovereign debt and allowed Ireland to print money backed by absolutely no collateral at all (see ECB Allows Irish Central Bank to Counterfeit 51 Billion Euros).

So how can Trichet be believed? For that matter, why should anyone believe Citigroup’s analysts either?

Judging from the reaction and the recent comments by Trichet, it appears he wants an orderly decline in the Euro to help exports much the same the US wants an orderly decline in the dollar, Brazil wants an orderly decline in the Real, and every country on the planet wants an orderly decline in their currency as well, all so that everybody can increase exports. Mathematically it does not work, and never did.

Trichet did manage to buy time, and that is always one immediate goal of every central banker.

Mike “Mish” Shedlock
http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com


Share
Twitter
Follow Us

FedUpUSA Twitter

Forum
NetworkedBlogs
FedUpUSA Supports
FedUpUSA
proudly supports:

Get Adobe Flash player
Bill Still
Bill Still For President

Kerry Bentivolio for Congress
Kerry Bentivolo
for Congress
Michigan 11th District

Tools and Resources
No More National Debt

By Bill Still
There is only one answer for the world economic situation; monetary reform.
1. No More National Debt
2. No More Fractional Lending


Filling in the Pieces
PDF PowerPoint

Congressional Patriots

Federal Reserve Balance Sheet

Paulson's Lies

Bernanke's Lies

FedUpUSA Archive

Mathematics of Failure

Media Kit

Door Hanger

Corruption Flier

Bank Flier

Made In America A list of products and services made right here in the USA. Choosing to buy American made products preserves and creates American jobs.