Donate
Freedom isn't free!
Please help FedUpUSA stay online.


Pre-Order
Leverage
Gear

Get Your Official FedUpUSA Gear Today!

FedUpUSA Gear

Get your TSA Not On Board Sign Stand Up For Your 4th Amendment Rights
In The Media

FedUpUSA YouTube Channel

The FedUpUSA Video

FedUpUSA Bear Stearns Protest Video

Karl Denninger on Dylan Ratigan 11/17/11

Karl Denninger on Dylan Ratigan 10/04/11

Karl Denninger on Fox Business 03/28/11

Stephanie Jasky at the National Constitution Center Civility In Democracy 03/26/11

FedUpUSA on Dylan Ratigan MSNBC 10/19/2010

FedUpUSA on Dylan Ratigan 10/7/2010

Stephanie Jasky's Interview With the UK Guardian How The Tea Party Movement Began 10/5/10

Karl Denninger on CNBC 7/9/2009

Karl Denninger on Glenn Beck 8/21/2008

FedUpUSA Co-Founder and Coordinator of the Washington DC Toilet Bowl Protest interviewed by the AP

FedUpUSA Founder Stephanie Jasky interviewed on Plains Radio

FedUpUSA Founder Stephanie Jasky's article 912 Protest Washington DC - What Was It All About? as seen on The Right Side of Life
The Law Show

Sundays @ 11:00 AM Eastern on WJR
Helping Homeowners In Michigan

The Law Show
Categories
Calendar
January 2011
M T W T F S S
« Dec   Feb »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31  

Archive for January, 2011

Mitchell J. Stein, Esq.: Trend of Bank of America Loan Modification and Consumer Abuses Needs Exposure

Pending Lawsuits Allege Pattern of Wrongful Foreclosures and Administrative Misdeeds That Shows Need for Consumer Protection against Major US Bank

Hidden Hills, CA (Vocus/PRWEB) January 25, 2011

Facing a national storm of criticism over treatment of homeowners and illegal mortgage foreclosures, and most recently sued by Arizona and Nevada over home-loan modification programs intended to keep homeowners who borrowed from its Countrywide mortgage unit out of foreclosure, Bank of America is being exposed as a leading factor in creating the problems homeowners face in the ongoing foreclosure crisis, according to Mitchell J. Stein, Esq. of Mitchell J. Stein & Associates.

“There is a disturbing pattern of the way Bank of America treats people being revealed through consumer feedback and the tremendous amount of negative media coverage, which simply put, is consistently terrible,” said Mitchell J. Stein, Esq., a 25-year award-winning litigator, trial lawyer, and philanthropist dedicated to protecting consumers and victims’ rights in reigning in abusive practices of banks, lenders and others. “It is vital that the behaviors of the banks that have helped create this crisis get national attention to help protect consumers, resolve the crisis and understand the Banks’ true role in it.”

While all 50 U.S. states are investigating whether banks and loan servicers used false documents and signatures to justify hundreds of thousands of foreclosures, Bank of America was sued in December, 2010 by Arizona and Nevada over home-loan modification programs intended to keep homeowners who borrowed from its Countrywide mortgage unit out of foreclosure. A judgment in 2009 to resolve a lawsuit alleging Countrywide engaged in fraud required the Bank create a loan modification program for former Countrywide borrowers in those states.

“According to the Arizona attorney general, instead of working to modify loans on a timely basis, Bank of America apparently proceeded with foreclosures while borrowers’ requests for modifications were still pending,” said Mitchell J. Stein, Esq. “This is another of many examples in the foreclosure crisis of Bank of America allegedly ignoring the law to pursue profits above people.”

In the Arizona and Nevada suits, the bank is accused of misleading consumers about requirements for the modification program and how long it would take for requests to be decided. The bank provided inaccurate and deceptive reasons for denying modification requests, according to the suits.

“From throwing people’s belongings into the street during wrongful foreclosures to foreclosing on homeowners working for loan modifications, there is a typical and despicable lack of consideration by the Bank for its customers, especially people in jeopardy of being evicted because the Bank repeatedly doesn’t fulfill its legal responsibilities in dealing with them and their mortgages,” said Mitchell J. Stein, Esq.

The Arizona lawsuit seeks a court order holding the bank in contempt for violating the agreement and requiring it to pay as much as $25,000 for each violation of the accord plus as much as $10,000 for each violation of the state’s consumer-fraud law. Nevada’s complaint seeks unspecified civil penalties and restitution.

The Arizona case is Arizona v Bank of America, CV2010- 33580, Maricopa County Superior Court (Phoenix). The Nevada case is Nevada v. Bank of America, Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County (Las Vegas).

ABOUT MITCHELL J. STEIN & ASSOCIATES

Mitchell J. Stein & Associates is a California-based law firm founded by M.J. Stein, Esq. a 25-year award-winning litigator, trial lawyer, financier, and entrepreneur who has represented many of the world’s largest companies and has been involved in some of the highest profile cases in the Nation’s history. The Firm’s philosophy is based on the belief that their clients’ needs are of the utmost importance and, as a result, a high percentage of the Firm’s business has been from repeat customers and referrals. The Firm’s practice areas include Complex Litigation, Bank Problems, Mergers & Acquisitions, Commercial and Residential Foreclosures , and Bankruptcy Litigation. Mr. Stein is also the founder of VIPS Foundation (Victims of Injustice Pain and Suffering), through which victims nationwide, over the last 15-years, have received assistance following unfortunate events that subjected them to oppression or mistreatment. In that regard, Mr. Stein received the inaugural Mitchell J. Stein Benefactor Award from the National Organization for Victims Assistance (NOVA) for his work in protecting victims’ rights. Visit http://www.mjsteinassociates.com or http://www.dobielaw.org for more information.

# # #

PRWeb Press Release

Share

Prosecuting? Did Someone Say Prosecuting?

 

I don’t believe it.

The bipartisan panel appointed by Congress to investigate the financial crisis has concluded that several financial industry figures appear to have broken the law and has referred multiple cases to state or federal authorities for potential prosecution, according to two sources directly involved in the deliberations.

Appear to have eh?

Yeah, I’d say so.

It’s not like there hasn’t been a running chronicle of these “apparent violations” of the law on The Market Ticker now for close to four years.  It’s not like there hasn’t been sworn testimony before this very body that these institutions were knowingly selling off bad loans – paper they knew was trash, but sold anyway.

And it’s not like there wasn’t filed just today a lawsuit that laid out the mother and father of these frauds, from top to bottom, virtually every allegation that I’ve made over the last four years in relationship to home lending – all rolled up in one.

I’ll believe it when I see it. 

That is, when actual charges are laid and we see some of these

Handcuffs by genesis

Which, given Eric PlaceHolder, I expect to see roughly about the time Hell freezes over.

The Market-Ticker

 

Share

And Now, For The Real Sh$%show….

 

Oh my, what do we have here?

Life Insurance Companies v Countrywide – filed Jan 24 2011

That would be a nasty little lawsuit (well, maybe not so little) against Countrywide (and its successor, Bank of America) in which it is alleged that Countrywide sold a lot of bogus paper to pretty much every large insurance company in the world.

In point, here’s the salient section:

1. This action concerns a massive fraud perpetrated by Defendant Countrywide Financial and certain of its officers and affiliates against the Plaintiffs, which are investors in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) issued by Countrywides subsidiaries. The Plaintiffs are institutional investors that wanted conservative, low-risk investments and thus bought Countrywide MBS (the Certificates) that were represented to be backed by mortgages issued pursuant to specific underwriting guidelines and rated investment-grade (primarily AAA). In purchasing the Certificates, the Plaintiffs and their investment managers relied on term sheets, prospectuses and other materials prepared by and provided to them by the Defendants, which made representations about the Countrywide Defendants purportedly conservative mortgage underwriting standards, the appraisals of the mortgaged properties, the mortgages loan-to-value (LTV) ratios, and other facts that were material to Plaintiffs investment decisions. Plaintiffs and their investment managers also relied on Defendants public statements concerning the Countrywide Defendants adherence to prudent underwriting guidelines and careful credit analysis. These representations by Defendants were recklessly or knowingly false when made. In reality, Countrywide was an enterprise driven by only one purpose to originate and securitize as many mortgage loans as possible into MBS to generate profits for the Countrywide Defendants, without regard to the investors that relied on the critical, false information provided to them with respect to the related Certificates.

If you want it distilled down into one sentence, it’s this: You told us you were selling us good paper, and in fact you were knowingly selling us a box of dogcrap.

We’ve seen a couple of these before.  But this one adds a new twist, and leads me to run up the

smiley

sign again….

Read starting at page 62.  Oh I’ll do it for you…

H. Countrywide Failed To Ensure That Title To The Underlying Loans Was Effectively Transferred

147. The rules for these transfers are governed by the law of the state where the property is located, by the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement (PSA) for each securitization, and by the law governing the issuing trust (with respect to matters of trust law). Generally, state laws and the PSAs require the promissory note and security instrument to be transferred by indorsement, in the same way that a check can be transferred by indorsement, or by sale. In addition, state laws generally require that the trustee have physical possession of the original, manually signed note in order for the loan to be enforceable by the trustee against the borrower in case of default.

smiley

148. In order to preserve the bankruptcy-remote status of the issuing trusts in RMBS transactions, the notes and security instruments are generally not transferred directly from the mortgage loan originator to the trust. Rather, the notes and security instruments are generally initially transferred from the originator (e.g., Countrywide Home) to the depositor (e.g., CWALT), either directly or via one or more special-purpose entities established by Countrywide Financial. After this initial transfer to the depositor, the depositor transfers the notes and security interests to the issuing trust for the particular securitization. Each of these transfers must be valid under applicable state law in order for the trust to have good title to the mortgage loans.

smiley

149. In addition, the PSA generally requires the transfers of the mortgage loans to the trust to be completed within a strict time limit after formation of the trust in order to ensure that the trust qualifies as a tax-free real estate mortgage investment conduit (REMIC).

150. The applicable state trust law generally requires strict compliance with the trust documents, including the PSA, so that failure to comply strictly with the timeliness, indorsement, physical delivery, and other requirements of the PSA with respect to the transfers of the notes and security instruments means that the transfers would be void and the trust would not havegood title to the mortgage loans.

smiley

151. The Offering Documents for each offering of the Certificates represented in substance that the issuing trust for that offering had obtained good title to the mortgage loans comprising the pool for the offering. In reality, however, Countrywide routinely failed to comply with the requirements of applicable state laws and the PSAs for valid transfers of the notes and security instruments to the issuing trusts. In Kemp .v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., Bkrtcy. No. 08-18700 (D.N.J.), Countrywide sought to prove that the Bank of New York, as trustee for an RMBS issuing trust that purportedly held Mr. Kemps mortgage, was entitled to enforce the mortgage. Countrywide presented testimony by Linda DeMartini, who had been employed by Countrywide Servicing for almost ten years as of August 2009 and was then a supervisor and operational team leader for the Litigation Management Department of Countrywide Servicing. Ms. DeMartini testified that, in her extensive career in the mortgage loan servicing business of Countrywide, I had to know about everything . . . . She testified that Countrywide Home originated Kemps loan in 2006 and transferred it to the Bank of New York as trustee for the issuing trust, but that Countrywide Servicing retained the original note in its own possession and never delivered it to the Bank of New York because Countrywide Servicing was the servicer for the loan.

What have I been prattling on for over a year about?  This exact point.

How many people have said this didn’t matter and wouldn’t be a problem?  Remember all the apologists for the banksters that said this wouldn’t lead to liability, it didn’t represent a void transfer, and that all this would be swept under the rug and be ok?

Care to rethink that position…. just a wee bit?

Looks to me like as the Statute of Limitations approaches and the firms in question that have gotten screwed have faced the choice of “shut up or sue” they’ve decided that the correct response is “Ok, I’ll sue.”

I doubt they’ll be interested in settling for a tiny amount of money either, given the default and economic harm numbers put forward in the complaint.

Nor do I think this will be a singular complaint – drop in your name and play “template” with this one folks.

smiley

The Market-Ticker

Share

Economy News Nightmare: 20 Things That You Should Not Read If You Do Not Want To Become Very Angry

 

Today America is very, very frustrated.  In fact, we probably have not seen this level of anger in the country since World War 2 ended.  So why are so many Americans so frustrated and so angry right now?  Well, for most Americans it comes down to the economy.  Very few things are more frustrating than not being able to find a job that will enable you to pay the mortgage and feed your family.  Middle class Americans that do have a little bit of money are digging into their savings and investments at a staggering rate as they desperately try to keep their heads above water.  Millions of other families that do not have a “safety cushion” are on the verge of losing their homes or have already been callously tossed out onto the streets by big, greedy banks.  Meanwhile, our politicians continue to burden us with increasingly larger amounts of government debt and they stand idly by as our jobs and our industries are shipped overseas.  So even though the mainstream media seems absolutely puzzled by the growing anger in America, the truth is that it is not a great mystery.  The economy is an absolute nightmare, and if it gets even worse people are going to become even more angry.

The mainstream media and our top politicians are running around proclaiming that the economy has turned around, and yet all of the important long-term economic numbers continue to get worse.  Do they think that the American people are stupid?

Perhaps they are just trying to be “optimistic” and are trying to get us all to “believe” in the economic recovery.

Well, while it certainly does not hurt to “stay positive” and to “have faith” when there is some basis in reality for doing so, but what the mainstream media is asking us all to do is to stick our heads in the sand and to pretend that all of our horrific economic problems are not even there.

Until we recognize exactly what our problems are and how bad they have gotten we will never be able to come up with the appropriate solutions.

Our economy does not just need a “tweak” or two.  Our economy is a total nightmare at this point.

The following are 20 things about our nightmare of an economy that you will not want to read if you do not want to become very, very angry….

#1 Today, millions of American families are digging deep into their savings and investments in a desperate attempt to stay afloat. Over the past two years, U.S. consumers have withdrawn $311 billion more from savings and investment accounts than they have put into them.

#2 15 billion dollars: the total amount of compensation that Goldman Sachs paid out to its employees for 2010.

#3 The number of American families that were booted out of their homes and into the streets set a new all-time record in 2010.

#4 Dozens of packages that we buy in the supermarket have been reduced in size by up to 20%.  For example, there are now 2 less slices of cheese in a typical package of Kraft American cheese, and there is now 9 percent less toilet paper in a typical package of Scott toilet paper.  So now, you may think that you are paying the same amount for these items that you always have, but the truth is that you have been hit with a large price increase.

#5 One Canadian company is making a ton of money shipping “millions and millions of dollars” worth of manufacturing equipment from factories that are being shut down in the United States over to new factories that are being set up in China.

#6 In America today, the wealthiest 20% own a whopping 93% of all the “financial assets” in the United States.

#7 Only 35 percent of Americans now have enough “emergency savings” to be able to cover three months of living expenses.

#8 47 percent of all Americans now believe that China is the number one economic power in the world.

 

#9 If the U.S. banking system is healthy, then why does the number of “problem banks” continue to keep increasing?  This past week the number of U.S. banks on the unofficial list of problem banks reached 937.

#10 According to former U.S. Labor Secretary Robert Reich, the wealthiest 0.1% of all Americans make as much money as the poorest 120 million.

#11 U.S. housing prices have now fallen further during this economic downturn than they did during the Great Depression of the 1930s.

#12 According to some very disturbing new research, 45 percent of U.S. college students exhibit “no significant gains in learning” after two years in college.

#13 Americans now owe more than $884 billion on student loans, which is a new all-time record.

#14 The United Nations says that the global price of food hit an all-time record high in December, and the price of oil is surging towards $100 a barrel, but the U.S. government continues to insist that we barely have any inflation at all.

#15 The more Americans that are on food stamps the more profits that JP Morgan makes.  Today, an all-time record of 43.2 million Americans are on food stamps, and JP Morgan is making a lot of money processing millions of those benefit payments.

#16 Back in 1970, 25 percent of all jobs in the United States were manufacturing jobs. Today, only 9 percent of the jobs in the United States are manufacturing jobs.

#17 Dozens of U.S. states are either implementing tax increases in 2011 or are considering proposals to raise taxes.

#18 The United States has had a negative trade deficit every single year since 1976.

#19 The U.S. national debt has crossed the $14 trillion mark for the first time, and at some point during 2011 it will cross the $15 trillion mark.

#20 What the U.S. economy really needs is for the government to get off all of our backs, but instead they continue to tighten their grip on us.  In fact, the Obama administration is proposing a “universal Internet ID” that would watch, track, monitor and potentially control everything that you do on the Internet.

The Economic Collapse

Share

Defunct Lenders Told No – For Right Now

 

In a stunning development a number of mortgage companies tried to get a judge to allow them to shred original files related to their loan originations….

WILMINGTON, Del., Jan 24 (Reuters) – A U.S. bankruptcy judge temporarily blocked bankrupt subprime lender Mortgage Lenders Network USA from destroying 18,000 boxes of original loan files after federal prosecutors said documents in them may be needed as evidence in more than 50 criminal investigations.

No, really?

There wasn’t any sort of fraud in the origination of those loans, was there?  And these documents wouldn’t actually prove that, would they?

You know, one of the disturbing parts of this entire mess is that due to the obstruction and political game-playing, these clowns may actually get away with running the clock on the Statute of Limitations.  I’m not sure what it is when it comes to these sorts of crimes, but it’s not indefinite – and if you can keep from being indicted for long enough, you can get away with it legally – even if you’re guilty as sin.

Yeah.

(Of course destroying all the evidence with a Judge’s permission might make getting away with it easier too, no?)

The Market-Ticker

Share

State Of The Union Preview Or Joke?

 

Bloomberg is out with this nonsense….

President Barack Obama said tomorrow’s State of the Union address will focus on cutting the deficit, reducing unemployment and ensuring the U.S. can compete with economic rivals.

Uh huh.  Let me guess.  You’re going to take 1/20th of the budget and cut it?

How are you going to cut the deficit Barack?  Seriously.  And how are you going to make the US “competitive” with economic rivals such as China?

Are you planning on repealing the Federal Minimum Wage?  You know – we have to pay people over $7/hour.  In China many people make $7/DAY.  Exactly how do you “compete” with that?

Or are you going to disband the EPA and tear up all the environmental laws?  After all, in China you just dump your poisons in the water and spew them into the air.  Might I remind you that much of China looks like this?

It’s very cheap to manufacture things when you can do that, as opposed to NOT spewing your pollution into the air, which costs much, much more.

Then there’s this:

In the video, Obama said that to maintain a competitive edge, the U.S. must stay the most “dynamic economy in the world” and make sure that future generations can “compete with workers anywhere in the world.”

“Now to do that, we’re going to have to out-innovate, we’re going to have to out-build, we’re going to have to out- compete, we’re going to have to out-educate other countries,” Obama said. “That’s our challenge.”

Uh huh.  See the above, then explain exactly what changes you will propose in our trade policy to address these imbalances. 

“We’re also going to have to deal with our deficits and our debt in a responsible way,” Obama said. “And we’ve got to reform government so that it’s leaner and smarter for the 21st century.”

Uh huh.  Can you explain how, when entitlements are 56% of the budget and we currently borrow about 43% of the budget, how you intend to be “learner and smarter” and get rid of the deficit – when you have to pay interest charges – without cutting those entitlements?

There are no Unicorns Barry. 

There are only facts.

The Market-Ticker

Share
Twitter
Follow Us

FedUpUSA Twitter

Forum
NetworkedBlogs
FedUpUSA Supports
FedUpUSA
proudly supports:

Get Adobe Flash player
Bill Still
Bill Still For President

Kerry Bentivolio for Congress
Kerry Bentivolo
for Congress
Michigan 11th District

Tools and Resources
No More National Debt

By Bill Still
There is only one answer for the world economic situation; monetary reform.
1. No More National Debt
2. No More Fractional Lending


Filling in the Pieces
PDF PowerPoint

Congressional Patriots

Federal Reserve Balance Sheet

Paulson's Lies

Bernanke's Lies

FedUpUSA Archive

Mathematics of Failure

Media Kit

Door Hanger

Corruption Flier

Bank Flier

Made In America A list of products and services made right here in the USA. Choosing to buy American made products preserves and creates American jobs.