Archive for April 19th, 2011
Max Keiser Interviews Janet Tavakoli (!!!)
For those who are unfamiliar with Janet (although regular readers of FedUpUSA should know her well):
Janet Tavakoli is the founder and president of Tavakoli Structured Finance, Inc. (TSF), a Chicago based consulting firm providing expert experience and knowledge about maximizing value in the face of complexity and uncertainty. TSF provides consulting services to financial institutions, institutional investors, and hedge funds. Ms. Tavakoli also provides expert consulting and expert witness work including exceptional quality expert report writing and crisp, persuasive testimony. Plaintiff engagements include Bank of America N.A. et al. v. Bartmann, JPM Chase, et al. Total claims in the consolidated litigation exceeded $1.2 billion. Engagements include representatives of plaintiffs or defendants depending on the issues.
Keiser Report: Murderers & Martyrs
Chris Whalen: The Biggest Bailout Was The Fed Bailing Out CONgress!
About 8:00 into this video.
For those who might not know, Chris Whalen is the Senior Vice President and Managing Director of Institutional Risk Analytics. All they do is assess banking risk.
Healthcare Cuts Loom For 130,000 Vets
Military.com posted an article discussing the various proposals for ‘balancing’ the ever-ballooning budget.
There has been some recent buzz about the House of Representatives proposing more cuts to veterans’ benefits. This time, the focus has fallen on VA Healthcare and excluding some veterans over others. Here is what you need to know about the debate.
The House Budget Committee recently announced plans to cut $6 billion from VA Healthcare for 1.3 million veterans who are in Priority Group 7 and 8. Roughly 10 percent of these, some 130,000 veterans, will be forced out of the VA system with no available alternatives. Veterans from Group 7 & 8 have either a 0 percent service-connection or no service-connected rating. While this does not mean the veteran is fit as a fiddle, it does imply they do not need the amount of care needed for other vets. These veterans pay co-pay and have incomes over $32,000 and net-worths under $80,000, depending on geography. In other words, they aren’t dirt poor but certainly not wealthy, either.
The Congressional Budget Office believes the U.S. can save $62 billion over the next 10 years by removing services for these veterans altogether. According to the agency, 90 percent of the veterans in question have access to some form other healthcare other than VA funded. However, the CBO does not comment on whether the alternative healthcare is affordable.
I’m going to say right up front that this is reprehensible. Not only is it disgusting, it’s pointless to pretend that ANY of these proposed cuts to VA benefits will be anything but a microscopic drop of water in an ocean. Let’s talk about some reality here.
So, let’s see….our overall spending on defense is only about 1/6th of our total budget outlay, or as indicated here, $744 billion. Of that, only a tiny fraction goes towards healthcare to our current and retired military. Keeping in mind that these brave men and women were willing to sacrifice their very LIVES to do their jobs, let’s compare that to banker welfare expenditures over the past 4 years.
First we have TARP, the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the program that has essentially been welfare for Wall Street bankers given by Congress to cover the massive Ponzi scheme they created by selling worthless securities to unsuspecting suckers like your pension and retirement fund managers. This program allowed the US government to purchase assets and equity from financial institutions to ‘strengthen’ the financial sector.
Then we have TALF the Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, the program designed to allow the Federal Reserve to use taxpayer money to buy ‘distressed’ (I prefer ‘worthless’) loans.
Then we have the EESA, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. Initiated under Bush, through acts of extortion by then Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson. This spawned TARP cited above, as well as expanded the powers of the US government to basically use taxpayer money wherever and whenever Wall Street deemed it needed it. This was where we got the ‘we’ll see tanks in the streets if we don’t get this money’ threat from Hank Paulson.
1. The Government As Investor: Total expenditure of taxpayer money – $9.0 TRILLION. This includes direct investments in financial institutions, purchases of ‘high-grade’ corporate debt and purchases of mortgage-backed securities issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and Ginnie Mae (the latter of which is the only legitimately government-guaranteed entity).
2. The Government as Insurer: Total expenditure of taxpayer money – $1.7 TRILLION. Includes insuring debt issued by financial institutions and guaranteeing poorly performing assets owned by banks and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
3. The Government as Lender: Total expenditure of taxpayer money – $1.4 TRILLION. A significant expansion of the government’s traditional overnight lending to banks, including extending terms to as many as 90 days and allowing borrowing by other financial institutions, which includes foreign banks.
This only includes figures up through February 2009. (Is your hair on fire yet?)
Now, let’s add in the most recent and nefarious taxpayer theft of all, ‘quantitative easing.’ What’s that? Here’s a primer:
While it is often explained as ‘printing money out of thin air’ – that’s not quite accurate. It is more specifically, printing money guaranteed by your future production. It borrows against the taxpayer’s future potential to actually produce something of value. If it sounds a little bit like exploitation or slavery, that’s because that is exactly what it is, which is precisely why the Federal Reserve is content to allow you to think it is printing money out of thin air. As distasteful as that is, it’s preferrable to the truth.
Each time the Federal Reserve prints money for which there is no current production to support, it is ‘pulling forward demand’ or, devaluing the US dollar. This is, in effect, a stealth tax on you, the taxpayer, as it then costs you more of those devalued dollars to purchase the things you need. This is commonly referred to as price inflation. So, you get hit on both sides. Your future production has been used as collateral for these new dollars created and at the same time, it causes you to need to produce more to afford the things you need to live – like food and energy (gas, oil). Conveniently those two catagories of expenditures are not included in the government’s calculation of inflation, (the Consumer Price Index or CPI).
So, what is your total liability for the two rounds of Quantitative Easing performed by the Federal Reserve?
So, let’s see, $14.8 TRILLION has been spent on WELFARE FOR WALL STREET BANKERS!
Now, tell me how there is ANY justification for cutting health care benefits to our Veterans.
While you’re at it, tell me what items can be cut from the budget that even comes close to the liability our government has created by bailing out insolvent banking institutions.
Wake up America. I don’t care where you stand on the current wars, are you willing to throw our troops under the bus for Wall Street welfare?!!

Who and what else are you willing to throw under the bus to allow our government to continue to support and hide massive corruption?
STOP THE LOOTING & START PROSECUTING!
Join the Discussion (registration required to post)
Senator Jim DeMint: Is He For Real?!

Well well what do we have here?
Throwing down the gauntlet, Republican Sen. Jim DeMint threatened Monday to block a vote in Congress on raising the U.S. debt ceiling unless he wins a balanced-budget amendment to the Constitution.
For real? Hmmm…. or is this just more political theater?
“The issue here is the debt ceiling has to be raised, and it cannot be held hostage to a process that is very complicated and difficult,” he (WH spokesman Jay Carney) said. “We hope we will reach an agreement on deficit reduction — a bipartisan agreement on deficit reduction within the time frame. We believe that’s possible.”
Actually, that’s not true. The debt ceiling does not have to be raised. However, not doing so would force an immediate balanced budget. The Treasury could not spend more than it takes in, whether Congress appropriated it or not.
It is important to note that this is not a default.
Default is when you don’t pay the interest and principal you owe. Default is not failing to keep political promises.
Geithner said repeatedly Sunday that lawmakers who want to take the country to the “brink” will bear the responsibility for the risk that creates.
Certainly.
Such a filibuster, especially a successful filibuster that is not some sort of kafkaesque political theater, risks my voting for them, donating to their campaigns, trumpeting their serious approach to the problem and writing about them in extended glowing, favorable terms.
He suggested that merely flirting with that edge would create a problem. But he said if Congress ultimately rejects an increase in the debt limit, it would trigger a crisis that makes that 2008 meltdown look tame. Geithner reiterated warnings that such a vote would force the government to halt benefits payments to seniors and veterans and would risk the government defaulting on its interest.
It would force the government to live within its means.
What Treasury would then pay and not pay is not Congress’ to determine on its own. Congress of course would have a voice in this, and could start “zeroing” things that do not perform a useful function.
Such a refusal to raise the debt limit, however, would not force a default on the interest and principal. It would not prevent rollover of existing debt. And it would not necessarily halt payments to seniors and veterans – although it would force reductions across-the-board.
How much? By about 43%.
Such a change would be the best thing that could happen to this nation since before the passage of the 17th Amendment, which was the single worst legislative event in the history of the country.
(The 17th Amendment destroyed the premise of a bicameral Legislature; one house beholden to the people, the other to the States. It was, with the stroke of a pen, an irrevocable and, in my opinion, ultimately fatal change to our Constitution. Prior to the 17th Amendment it was impossible for The Federal Government to cram programs down the States’ throats as they couldn’t get through the Senate.)
Let’s see if Jim DeMint has the balls to follow through.
Oh, and as for Rand Paul? He’s got his finger in the air – exactly as I expected:
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., on CNN’s “State of the Union,” said it’s “yet to be determined” whether he would support a filibuster on the debt ceiling vote.
(Yet another) empty suit.
Go Jim DeMint!
Dissolving Governments in Michigan; Detroit Moves Against Public Unions
Dissolving Governments in Michigan
New measures passed in Michigan will allow the state to dissolve governments, void union contracts, toss aside elected school-board members, close schools and authorize charter schools. Thankfully, those measures are being put to good use.
Please consider Using New Emergency Financial Manager Law, They Start Dissolving Governments in Michigan
In what is likely to be just the first of several dissolutions of democratically elected city governments and school boards in Michigan, the Emergency Financial Manager of Benton Harbor, Joseph Harris, just took away all authority from the city’s elected government.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Absent prior express written authorization and approval by the Emergency Manager, no City Board, Commission or Authority shall take any action for or on behalf of the City whatsoever other than:
i) Call a meeting to order.
ii) Approve of meeting minutes.
iii) Adjourn a meeting.2. That all prior resolutions, or acts of any kind of the City in conflict herewith are and the same shall be, to the extent of such conflict, rescinded.
3. This order shall be effective immediately.
The author of that blog sees it differently than I do. “EmptyWheel” complains. I cheer.
When you are bankrupt you lose authority to a bankruptcy board. That bankruptcy board gets to make actions. As part of those actions, city officials who could not or did not do their job, lose their rights to govern.
How can that possibly be wrong?
In many instances elected officials cannot possibly do their jobs because of poor decisions made by their predecessors. For examples, many cities are cash-strapped because of untenable agreements on wages and benefits given to public unions.
Public unions typically will not negotiate, being the foolish entities they are. So bankruptcy and takeover is the solution.
Detroit Moves Against Public Unions
Benton Harbor is small-potatoes. Detroit is big-time. Moreover, Detroit is bankrupt and public unions are part of the reason. Thus, I am pleased to report Detroit Moves Against Unions
A new state law has emboldened the Detroit mayor and schools chief to take a more aggressive stance toward public unions as the city leaders try to mop up hundreds of millions of dollars in red ink.
Robert Bobb, the head of the Detroit Public Schools, late last week sent layoff notices to the district’s 5,466 salaried employees, including all of its teachers, a preliminary step in seeking broad work-force cuts to deal with lower enrollment.
Mr. Bobb, already an emergency financial manager for the struggling and shrinking public school system, is getting further authority under a measure signed into law March 17 that broadens state powers to intervene in the finances and governance of struggling municipalities and school districts. This could enable Mr. Bobb to void union contracts, sideline elected school-board members, close schools and authorize charter schools.
Mr. Bobb, appointed in 2009 by Democratic Gov. Jennifer Granholm and retained by Republican Gov. Rick Snyder, pledged last week to use those powers to deal decisively with the district’s $327 million shortfall and its educational deficiencies. Mr. Bobb raised the possibility of making unilateral changes to the collective-bargaining agreements signed with teachers less than two years ago.
He is also expected to target seniority rights that protect longtime teachers from layoffs and give them the ability to reject certain school placements.
Detroit Federation of Teachers officials called the initiative a poor idea, in part because nine of the schools slated for conversion to charter designation or closure were recently given new dispensation to relax work rules and haven’t had enough time to demonstrate their progress, they said.
I cheer Rick Snyder and anyone else willing to take public unions head on. Those unions are part of the problem (not all of it), and zero part of the solution.
As part of the solution (not all of it), we need national right-to-work laws, the scrapping of Davis-Bacon and all prevailing wage laws, and a complete end to collective bargaining of public unions.
Mike “Mish” Shedlock
US Gets Credit Rating Downgrade
Uh oh…..
S&P has maintained the US rating at “AAA” but cut the outlook to negative.
Um, about those nasty facts I’ve been writing on the for the last four or so years……
Last week I revised the Tickercon condition to “2″ from “3″ on Obama’s speech in which he basically told the world that we were going to run trillion dollar deficits as far as the eyes could see, along with identical statements from Representative Ryan, despite his protests to the contrary of claimed primary surpluses thirty years from now.
This morning you have a series of reactions that are especially nasty as a consequence of this announcement:
Futures markets and dollar down. There goes Ben’s ability to “manage” this mess.
I have long said that the hubris of our government is unprecedented – and unwarranted. That the world and markets would not wait for 30 years or more to see us “turn a fiscal corner”, as Ryan and the so-called “Tea Party” seemed to think they had.
Well, now the truth is in front of your face. S&P wants to see fiscal restraint right now and a defined timeline on those changes – and not Ryan’s timeline either:
We believe there is a material risk that U.S. policymakers might not reach an agreement on how to address medium- and long-term budgetary challenges by 2013; if an agreement is not reached and meaningful implementation does not begin by then, this would in our view render the U.S. fiscal profile meaningfully weaker than that of peer ‘AAA’ sovereigns.
Fix it now gentlemen and have actual results by 2013 or we lose our “AAA” rating.
CONGRESS AND THE ADMINISTRATION MUST STOP THE DEFICIT SPENDING.
NOT PROMISE TO DO IT IN 2040 BY WHICH TIME ALL THE CLOWNS WHO MADE THE PROMISE WILL BE OUT OF OFFICE OR DEAD – YOU MUST INSTEAD PUT IN PLACE VERIFIABLE AND SERIOUS PLANS TO DO IT RIGHT NOW WITH ACTUAL IMPLEMENTATION NO LATER THAN 2013.
That’s what was just said by S&P. Ignore it if you wish, but the fact of the matter is that all the money-printer games and lies from Congresspeople just ran into a problem: The door got slammed closed on your kleptocratic fingers.
As I have been warning would happen if we continued to play with ticking fiscal nuclear devices in the form of attempting to prevent recognition of economic contraction by transferring risk to our sovereign balance sheet: Taping over the window does not stop the timer from counting to zero.
Congress and The White House must accept the economic consequences that will come from cessation of deficit spending now. We cannot compound any more debt and interest into the federal budget to protect those who were imprudent on Wall Street. The losses happened when the bad loans and credit extensions happened – they cannot be avoided.
Time’s up gentlemen.
Update: As the day has gone on the fear indication has gone due north. Fear, that is, that Congress is utterly incapable of dealing with what has to be done – that is, getting us to a position of halting additional sovereign debt accumulation and removing some of what’s there. That means primary surplus gentlemen – period. The carry unwind and run into the Treasury curve is exactly what one would expect. Best-a-luck on ignoring this one in DC…. (and you know they’ll try with more platitudes and lies!)









