FedUpUSA

Archive for the ‘Barack Obama’ Category

Earlier today, Obama formally proposed his 2013 budget (link) which sees a $1.33 trn budget deficit in the 2013 fiscal year – more than the $1.296 trillion 2011 budget deficit, which unfortunately indicates that even with rather rosy assumptions, the deficit hole continues to grow, which also means that the debt plug will be higher in the next year compared to the prior, which in turn lends even more credibility to the US debt clock analysis which assumes a nearly 140% debt/GDP ratio by the end of a potential second Obama term.

While that will likely end up being an optimistic estimate, for near-term discussion purposes, the probability of even this particular budget passing is slim to none as the GOP reaction in the republican controlled Congress has been swift and brutal. Per the WSJ: “Republicans moved quickly to denounce Mr. Obama’s budget plan. “This proposal isn’t really a budget at all. It’s a campaign document,” Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R., Ky.) said… Rep. Paul Ryan (R., Wis.), the chairman of the House Budget Committee, said, “Again the president has ducked responsibility, he has punted again, he has failed to take any notable action on this crisis.” “All we’re getting here is more spending, more borrowing and more debt that will lead to slower economic growth,” Mr. Ryan said on a conference call with reporters.

Republicans are expected to offer their own budget plan in the next month. The president’s populist message is weaved throughout his proposal. “For many Americans, the basic bargain at the heart of the American dream has eroded,” the president said while reiterating a call for nearly $1.5 trillion in tax increases on higher-income Americans over 10 years. He added he is seeing “signs that our economy is on the mend” and that this is a “make-or-break moment for the middle class, and for all those who are fighting to get there.” So while this “budget” is not even worth the paper it is printed on (unlike reserves, they actually still use paper for these things) here per the WSJ, are the key charts that form the foundation of the budget forecast.

Receipts and Outlays:

Deficit Forecasts:

Cash Flow:

And probably the one chart that the GOP will throw up all over: Defense, Medicare:

Got hockeystick?

ZeroHedge

Oh look, show trials complete with plea deals that are entered at the same time as are the charges!

Federal prosecutors unveiled criminal charges against three former Credit Suisse Group AG employees, providing a window into the way traders allegedly invented inflated values for mortgage bonds during the financial crisis.

Two of the three men pleaded guilty to criminal charges of conspiracy, admitting they attempted to conceal the scheme from managers in a bid to boost their bonuses.

Yes, and happy days are here again, the bad guys are all in prison and we can all go back to our work.

One employee was captured on a taped call worrying that “someone is going to spot” the inflated prices, prosecutors said. When another employee told his boss he should book a large loss, the boss allegedly balked: “That’s a lot of money, dude,” according to a taped conversation cited by prosecutors.

Wait a second… Taped call eh?  From 2007 and 2008?  Can someone please explain why it’s four years later when we’re seeing these charges?

Oh, I wonder if the delay has anything to do with this?

A U.S. Justice Department source has told The Daily Caller that at least two DOJ prosecutors accepted cash bribes from allegedly corrupt finance executives who were indicted under court seal within the past 13 months, but never arrested or prosecuted.

The sitting governor of the U.S. Virgin Islands, his attorney general and an unspecified number of Virgin Islands legislators also accepted bribes, the source said, adding that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder is aware prosecutors and elected officials were bribed and otherwise compromised, but has not held anyone accountable.

The bribed officials, an attorney with knowledge of the investigation told TheDC, remain on the taxpayers’ payroll at the Justice Department without any accountability. The DOJ source said Holder does not want to admit public officials accepted bribes while under his leadership.

Say it isn’t so!  I mean, c’mon — there hasn’t been anything going on with bribery when it comes to, oh, Jefferson County in Alabama, right?  We haven’t actually seen municipal officials go to prison while the banksters who booked outsized profits (and after all, for there to be a bribe someone must offer a bribe while someone else receives said bribe) walk around chuckling, right?

But this allegation is a new low — if true, then there are people walking around right now who had indictments filed under seal but the indicted handed over the proverbial “big envelope” and, well, people sorta “forgot” about it.

Read the whole story over at Daily Caller.  It’s disgusting, and one has to assume that if this occurred in that context it is probably not an isolated incident.

On December 13, 2011, the Wall Street Journal published an article entitled “Banks in Push for Pact.” It was an obscure article buried in the real estate section.  The article contained this clause:  “Under the proposal, banks would be released from legal claims tied to servicing delinquent mortgages as well as certain mortgage-origination practices….”  Opponents of this proposed amnesty for mortgage-origination fraud have charged repeatedly that the federal government and Tom Miller, the Attorney General of Iowa, who is leading the settlement negotiations, support the amnesty.  Previously, Miller’s key lieutenant, but not the Obama administration, angrily denounced the charge.

The Four Levels of Control Fraud Involving Mortgages

Home lenders, particularly those making liar’s loans, typically committed endemic “accounting control fraud” on multiple levels.  Control fraud occurs when the persons controlling a seemingly legitimate entity use it as a “weapon” to defraud.  Accounting is the “weapon of choice” for financial control frauds.  Mortgage frauds can be grouped into four levels, each of them exceptionally widespread:  loan origination fraud by the lenders and their agents, the fraudulent sale of fraudulent mortgages, the fraudulent pooling and sale of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) in which the underlying was largely fraudulent mortgages, and foreclosure fraud.

Loan Origination Fraud

The classic economics article describing such frauds is George Akerlof and Paul Romer’s “Looting: the Economic Underworld of Bankruptcy for Profit” (1993).  The recipe” for accounting control fraud by a lender (or purchaser) has four ingredients.

1. Extreme growth by making (or purchasing)
2. Loans of extremely poor quality at a premium yield
3. While employing extreme leverage, and
4. Providing grossly inadequate allowances for loan and lease losses (ALLL)

Origination fraud involved a series of mutually supportive frauds: inflating the borrower’s income, inflating the appraised value of the home, providing grossly inadequate allowances for loan and lease losses (ALLL), and failing to recognize losses on fraudulent loans held in portfolio.  It was also common for federally insured lenders to file false reports with and make false statements to the regulators.  Lenders that made liar’s loans were “accounting control frauds.”  Their CEOs cause them to create perverse incentives to suborn the supposedly independent experts to provide opinions that inflate values and understate risk in order to aid and abet the underlying accounting fraud.  These perverse incentives create a “Gresham’s” dynamic in which bad ethics drives good ethics out of the marketplace.  The result is “echo” fraud epidemics.  Each of these frauds constitutes a federal felony.  Most of the frauds I have described are also felonies under state law.  Collectively, there were millions of origination frauds with a total dollar amount of fraudulent originations well in excess of $1 trillion.

The Fraudulent Sale of Fraudulent Loans

The second level of fraud is the fraudulent sale by the lenders of the fraudulent loans.   This form of fraud required endemic false “reps and warranties.”  Roughly 90 percent of liar’s loans were sold, so this second level of fraud also constitutes millions of federal and state felonies and roughly $1 trillion in fraudulent sales.

The Frauds involved in Pooling Fraudulent Loans to Create and Sell Fraudulent CDOs

The third level of fraud is the sale of collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) “backed” by fraudulent liar’s loans through false disclosures.  This level of fraud constitutes tens of thousands of federal felonies and roughly $1 trillion in fraudulent sales.

Foreclosure Fraud

The fourth level of fraud is foreclosure fraud.  The best known of these frauds involved the commission of hundreds of thousands of felonies through the filing of false affidavits to secure foreclosures (inaptly called “robo signing”).

Massive Foreclosure Fraud Generated the Global Settlement Discussions

It was this last level of fraud that prompted the settlement discussions.  What one must keep constantly in mind when dealing with lenders that are control frauds is that they and their senior officers will be represented by the best criminal defense lawyers.  America still does many things superbly, and we do lawyers really well.  The fraudulent officers who control banks engaged in control fraud will spend bank funds like water for their defense lawyers.  The old joke is that when one is dealt lemons one should make lemonade.  In law school, however, we consider that the “C minus” answer.  When dealt lemons; the best lawyers seek to make Dom Perignon.

Consider the setting – you represent a systemically dangerous institution (SDI) that was the beneficiary of a federal bailout.  Your client has made hundreds of thousands of fraudulent liar’s loans and fraudulently sold the great bulk of them.  If your client is held responsible for these frauds it will have to reveal that it is massively insolvent and face receivership.  Your client is also one of the largest mortgage loan servicers in the world.  A small law firm representing a borrower has taken the deposition of one of your client’s key employees who signed the affidavits necessary to support roughly ten thousand foreclosures a month – and admitted that the key statements she has made in each of those affidavits is false.  The somnolent federal government had finally been forced to admit that the banks have engaged in endemic foreclosure fraud.  The states are also involved.  This would be a nightmare scenario for any normal client.  For an SDI, however, it was an opportunity.

L’audace, encore l’audace, toujours l’audace!

(Audacity, more audacity, always audacity: the white collar defense lawyer’s creed)

One of the secrets to being an extraordinarily effective elite criminal is also true of their lawyers – audacity.  Elite white-collar criminals can frequently get away with grotesque criminal conduct if they use their exceptional advantages provided by wealth, privilege, and seeming legitimacy.   Even within the ranks of elite white-collar criminals, however, the CEOs who control SDIs – particularly during a financial crisis that they caused – are unique in their power to commit crimes with impunity.  They hold the national, even global, economy hostage.  Treasury Secretary Geithner has made this strategy simple by displaying the “Stockholm Syndrome.”  He has fallen in love with the criminals that are holding our economy hostage.  Geithner claims that the fraudulent SDIs are so fragile that they would collapse if they were even investigated seriously for fraud.  He conveniently ignores the fact that the primary reason for the SDIs’ fragility is that their CEOs looted the banks.

They can also use “their” bank to buy the modern equivalent of indulgences for even the most destructive frauds.  There are two non-exclusive means of buying indulgences.  The most obvious means is political contributions.  The finance industry is the leading funder of both political parties. The less obvious means of buying immunity arises from the dysfunctional nature of DOJ policies for (not) prosecuting major firms for serious felonies and the ability of the CEO to use corporate funds to purchase personal immunity from criminal prosecutions.  Five facts about the criminal defense of large firms must be kept prominently in mind when considering the defense of banksters.  First, the CEO will gladly trade off billions of dollars in payments by the bank and its liability insurers in order to secure immunity from criminal charges against the CEO and the senior officers who could implicate the CEO.

Second, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has essentially ceased to prosecute large firms for serious felonies.  DOJ was so traumatized by the consequences of prosecuting Arthur Andersen that it has decided to allow large firms to enter into “deferred prosecution” agreements (in which prosecution is, in reality, perpetually deferred).  Arthur Andersen had entered into two deferred prosecution agreements, and DOJ offered it a third, when AA refused the agreement and went to trial.

Third, while I have referred to the firm as the “client” and the firm and its insurers typically pay for the attorney fees and fines, it is the CEO that can hire and fire outside counsel.  Outside counsel, therefore, are chosen by fraudulent CEOs because they are willing to aid and abet the CEO in looting the real client (the firm).  This is a classic example of the fraudulent bank CEO deliberately creating a Gresham’s dynamic in which the least ethical members of the “independent” profession drive the most ethical out of lucrative representations.  In criminology jargon, control frauds are criminogenic.  Fraudulent CEOs use their ability to make compensation for officers, employees, and independent professionals perverse in order to create environments that cause widespread frauds that aid and abet the lender’s fraud scheme.  To put it in plainer, biblical English:  fraud begets fraud.

Fourth, the settlement payments are typically deductible from taxes.  This means that the defendant’s actual burden of paying the fine is much smaller than the announced amount of the fine.

Fifth, defense counsel typically promise to pay some portion of the fines to the victims of the fraud.  This is a brilliant tactic.  It makes the government attorneys feel good about the settlement and it allows them to bash opponents of the settlement as blocking relief for the victims.  The tactic, of course, is cynical and dishonest.  The weak settlement is what prevents a far greater recovery for the victims of the fraud.  The government does not have to wait for a settlement to aid the victims of foreclosure fraud.

Settlement discussions by counsel for control frauds with the government and shareholders are all about exceptionally able and zealous legal representation of the CEO at the expense of the client, its shareholders, and the public.  Only vigorous regulators and prosecutors can protect the firm, shareholders, and public from looting by these CEOs and the allies they generate.

The Proposed Deal: The $1 Trillion Lagniappe

The obvious deal that criminal defense counsel for banks always seek is to trade a showy amount of fines for de facto or even formal immunity for the CEO and other senior officers who led the frauds and became wealthy through the frauds.  Here, the defense counsel were far more audacious – they are demanding immunity not only from prosecution, but even from investigation, and they are demanding immunity for crimes they committed that have never been investigated by the state and local prosecutors.  The foreclosure fraud cases, while enormous, are by far the least of the banksters’ worries.  The potential loss exposure from the foreclosure fraud is measured in the tens of billions of dollars.  The potential loss exposure from fraudulent home loan originations is in the trillions of dollars – and a trillion is a thousand billion.  The banks’ CEOs are demanding, for a puny $25 billion, a release from liability for foreclosure fraud.  That is obscene on multiple levels.  Even President Obama concedes that the banks treat such fines as a mere “cost of doing business” (by which he means the “small tax on the wealth obtained by elites through doing fraudulent business”).  The senior officers involved in the fraud should be imprisoned.  Giving them immunity, allowing them to keep their bonuses “earned” through fraud, and keeping them in leadership roles are all despicable acts that should be anathema to every prosecutor.

But what came next went beyond scandal as usual.  The banks then demanded a lagniappe – a little something extra, for free, in a New Orleans restaurant – they wanted immunity for loan origination fraud.  The slight difference is that this lagniappe is worth trillions of dollars to the frauds.  It sickens me to inform the reader that the Obama administration is eager to provide the frauds with this lagniappe.  The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), led by Secretary Shaun Donovan, is actively pushing this scandalous deal, with strong support in the background from Treasury Secretary Geithner.  The silence of Attorney General Holder, and President Obama, on this travesty is exceptional.

Worse, the banks are seeking immunity even from investigation of the over trillion dollars in mortgage origination fraud – and the Obama and Bush administrations’ supposed “investigations” of mortgage origination fraud by the large lenders that made the mass of liar’s loans are all unworthy of the word “investigations.”  It would take roughly 100 investigators, working for years, to do a serious investigation of any of the largest liar’s loan lenders.  There has never been, remotely, such an investigation by the federal government of the any large liar’s loan lender.  The Obama administration is reported to support the fraudulent financial CEOs’ dearest dream – de facto immunity even from investigation of over a trillion dollars in fraudulent liar’s loans origination.

The Republican Party and its candidates for the Party’s presidential nomination are not criticizing Obama’s proposed formal surrender to crony capitalism.  They only wish they were in complete power and could cash in even more heavily on the tidal bore of campaign contributions flowing out of the finance industry.

Miller, and everyone involved, knows there was endemic origination fraud

Miller no longer denies that he has joined the administration in favoring the banks’ most cherished dream – amnesty for originating a trillion dollars in fraudulent home loans.   Indeed, the settlement is designed to prevent even investigations of the mortgage origination fraud.

I confess that I am so naïve that I would have believed it impossible that any federal or state governmental entity would enter into such an abject surrender to crony capitalism.  Once I learned that they were seriously contemplating such a travesty I could not believe that Miller would support it.  I believed his lieutenant’s (Mr. Madigan’s) denunciation of criticism of the proposed amnesty.  (I have reviewed Madigan’s comments in preparing this piece and I see that they were artfully crafted to be disingenuous.) The testimony of Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General of Iowa, at a 2007 Federal Reserve Board hearing shows that he knows that the lenders engaged in massive origination fraud.

Over the last several years, the subprime market has created a race to the bottom in which unethical actors have been handsomely rewarded for their misdeeds and ethical actors have lost market share…. The market incentives rewarded irresponsible lending and made it more difficult for responsible lenders to compete. Strong regulations will create an even playing field in which ethical actors are no longer punished.

Despite the well documented performance struggles of 2006 vintage loans, originators continued to use products with the same characteristics in 2007.

Miller, T.  2007.  “Comments to the Federal Reserve Board ofGovernors on Adopting Regulations to Prohibit Unfair and Deceptive Acts andPractices under the Home Ownership and Equity Protection Act (HOEPA).” (August 14).  Miller was correct. We know that it was overwhelmingly lenders and their agents that put the lies in “liar’s” loans.  We know that 90 percent of liar’s loans were fraudulent.  We know that the industry massively increased the number of liar’s loans after warnings that the loans were endemically fraudulent.  The growth rate of liar’s loans was so rapid (over 500% from 2003-2006) that these fraudulent loans caused the housing bubble to hyper-inflate.  We know that no government entity ever caused any entity to make or purchase (and that includes Fannie and Freddie) liar’s loans.  Indeed, the government repeatedly warned of the dangers of liar’s loans.  We know that by 2006 roughly one-third of all home loans made that year were liar’s loans – which means there were millions of fraudulent loans made annually and, collectively, trillions of dollars in fraudulently originated home loans.

What must be done

Our economy and our democracy cannot succeed under crony capitalism.  Please join me in writing to Congress, the administration, your state attorney general, the media, and any court that must approve this proposed settlement.  It is a disgrace.  President Obama is, of course, correct that some actions can be illegal but exceptionally unethical and damaging.  He is about to take precisely such an action in derogation of his oath of office to defend and protect the constitution of the United States of America.  The fraudulent CEOs of the banks that became wealthy by causing the financial crisis and the Great Recession are treating us as fools who will give trillion dollar plus gifts to the least deserving, most arrogant, and least ethical elites.  Have we fallen so low as a people that we will allow this to happen?

Please join me in supporting the Attorney Generals of New York, Delaware, and California who have opposed this settlement.  As for President Obama, I hope that he will make this New Year’s resolution:  “I resolve to honor my oath of office and faithfully execute the laws of the United States and defend its constitution, which is premised on justice and the rule of law.  No person, no matter how elite, is above that law.  I have today asked Messrs. Bernanke, Geithner, and Donovan for their resignations because of their support for bailing out the elite banks and granting de facto amnesty to fraudulent financial CEOs.  I, and my new Attorney General and new Secretary of the Treasury, have mutually resolved to make the vigorous prosecution of the elite financial frauds that drove the ongoing crisis our mission. ”

William K. Black – New Economic Perspectives

Hilarity ensues.  (Click for larger image.)

A protester handed President Barack Obama a note while shaking hands along a rope line in New Hampshire today.  AP photographer Charlie Dharapak smartly zoomed in so you can read the note for yourself.

For those of you who like to know (myself included) the technical information on how Charlie shot the pictures, here it is. Both frames were made with a Canon 1D Mark IV with a 70-200mm zoom lens. The exposure was 1/250 @ f2.8 rated at 1600iso. The first image was shot at 70mm and the close up was shot at 160mm.

Source: Paid to See

Just to make sure everyone understands, diverting funds isn’t just a city and state sport.  Why no, we do it for those who make political donations too — especially those who bundle together really big political donations….

A new book by Hoover Institution fellow Peter Schweizer details the startling extent of the cronyism that has pervaded President Obama’s “green jobs” push. According to Schweizer, 4 out of every 5 renewable energy companies backed by the Energy Department was “run by or primarily owned by Obama financial backers.”

Those companies’ “political largesse is probably the best investment they ever made in alternative energy,” Schweizer explains. “It brought them returns many times over.”

80% eh?  That’s a pretty impressive number.  And while I can argue that renewable energy companies are probably more likely to be run by Democrats than Republicans you can be a Democrat and not give a lot of money to a Presidential campaign, can’t you?

Why yes you can…. but in this case the “yes we can” appears to be directly related to Obama’s political donations — give him a lot of money and the federal spigot will open and shower you with taxpayer funds!

This might be defensible if these companies actually turned out to be good investments.  But then we have Solyndra, which it appears was on the verge of failure just before it was bailed out, and it appears the firm re-wrote loan covenants to effectively pay off prior private party loans with the nice taxpayer milk that came from you and I even as the firm was on the verge of failure!

Only in government, my friends.  No private lender would ever allow such a thing to happen.

In private business when you try to screw someone like this the attempt is almost-certain to draw a lawsuit in response and might draw a criminal charge.

When it comes to government handouts?

Not so much.

Here is your crook in chief, making sure that your hard-earned tax money is siphoned off to his cronies that in turn “donate” money to his re-election campaign….

And by “over”, I mean really, truthfully over.

Look folks, there’s really nothing more-serious than grabbing client funds internally.  It’s black-letter wrong, and it appears to have happened in the case of MF Global:

The filing came as MF Global told regulators of potential “deficiencies” in some customer accounts, according to a statement by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Regulators are investigating whether hundreds of millions of dollars are missing from client accounts, according to a person with knowledge of the matter.

The “mainstream media” outlets this morning are talking about this being a “risk management” issue.  Nonsense.  This is a trust issue and Corzine is a former Goldman guy and the former governor of New Jersey.

The political connections are deep as well:

President Obama is desperately putting his Wall Street stock in an unlikely old buddy.

The beleaguered president has recruited former Goldman Sachs head honcho Jon Corzine to shore up re-election funds from the banking industry, which is furious over Obama’s financial regulations.

Corzine, the former governor of New Jersey who was blasted out of office by Republican Chris Christie in 2009, has attended secret meetings with the president and has been working on Obama’s 2012 campaign for months, The Post has learned.

The Democrat, who now leads Manhattan-based brokerage MF Global, has been tasked with scraping up the very little banking-industry support Obama can still get.

Nice.  Oh, that’s from July, if anyone’s interested.

The obvious questions that this little “incident” raises are too many to count but at their core go straight to the credibility of our entire financial system.  None of them are pretty.  Our markets are responding pretty much as you’d expect and coupled with the European situation which is also a matter of confidence and lies we’ve lost 70 S&P points — or about 5% of the the market’s total value — in the last 36 hours.

How much more of this is out there?  There’s no way to know and that’s the root of the problem, just as it was in 2008.

But this much we do know: This is not an issue of a firm that allegedly broke every rule in the book when it comes to the sanctity of customer funds.  Rather it is a story of utterly failed regulation and oversight that continues four years after the collapse that initiated in 2007.

It is the story of willful and intentional blindness by our government and the instrumentalities within it that are supposed to prevent this sort of crap from happening.

Let us remember that MF Global was just added to the primary dealer list in 2010!

The bankruptcy does raise questions, however, about how the Fed picks the primary dealers — especially since MF Global was one of four firms added to the ranks after new, more stringent requirements were put in effect in 2010.

I have to ask: Was that a political addition and where in the hell were the examiners that are supposed to be paying attention to what these firms are doing?  If this is the result of “more-stringent” requirements can someone tell me why I should believe that any of the other Primary Dealers are in fact solvent and why I should not believe that they’re all doing the same thing?

Oh, there’s no reason to be “concerned”, right?  That’s why the banks were positively pounded yesterday and the carnage appears to be continuing today.  It’s why this isn’t limited to the United States but is also happening over in Europe.  It’s why this morning the DAX is down 4%, the CAC is down 4% and the FTSE is down 2.5%.  It’s why nobody trusts a balance sheet — because there is no reason to trust any of them in the financial sector as we continue today, four years on, to have these sorts of “surprises” where hidden risk “magically appears” at the most-inopportune time and then we continue to hear the utter lie that “nobody could have seen it coming.”

The reason “nobody sees it coming” is that The SEC and banking “regulators” are averting their eyes — on purpose!

This is the continuing story, as I lay out in Leverage, of “two worlds” where one has the rule of law (you and I) enforced, where robbing a bank gets you a nice long prison sentence and some cops looking for bank robbers to stop them while in the other, inhabited by politically-connected and powerful men and women you can pretty much do anything you damn well please and nothing happens to you — in fact, you get rewarded with calls from The President of the United States and pick the pockets of the public with essential impunity.

You cannot trust ANY balance sheet given to you today — in point of fact the government itself demanded that FASB allow lies as a business practice when it comes to the alleged value of securities.  It’s that simple.

This is not the mark of a representative republic, it is not the mark of a free and fair market, and it is not “crony capitalism.”

It is a mark of a feudal system where outright looting is not only permitted it is encouraged.

There are no checks and balances and the banksters wield their briefcases like John Dillinger wielded his tommy gun.  There has been no reform since 2008. Dodd-Frank was a joke, Glass-Steagall was not put back in place, and there was no prosecution of those who did wrong.

SEVENTEEN PAGES IN GLASS-STEAGALL – 17 PAGES – KEPT THE BANKING SYSTEM SAFE FOR FIFTY YEARS.

And now we have another collapse that appears to show that there is no regulation, there is no oversight and nobody in the government gives a damn when one of the primary dealers that the government charges with making an orderly market in Treasuries appears to have co-mingled more than half a billion in customer funds with their own trading book.

People have taken cheap shots at me for supporting the goals of “Occupy Wall Street” — first and foremost among them being that the looting must be stopped.

If you’re one of the customers of MF Global who’s customer funds seem to have “disappeared” into the world of leverage abuse would you like to rethink your view that these folks are a bunch of anarchists that are just flat dead wrong this morning?

Perhaps it’s time for you to take the blinders off and have a whiff of the coffee that I’ve been offering up for the last four years.  The caffeine will make for a damn good start to the morning and, if you have a brain in your head, stoke righteous outrage and a long-overdue demand to STOP THE LOOTING AND START PROSECUTING.

And by the way, if we don’t start doing that right here and now?

This game is nearing its forced conclusion and you’re not going to like it.