Archive for the ‘Bubbles’ Category
The Last Bubble: The Problem of Unresolved Debt in the US Financial System
Michael David White has painted some dire pictures of the US housing market, but this one is shocking in its implications.
Chart fromA Blistering Ride Through Hell by Michael David White.
I enjoyed the synopsis of this chart that was done by Automatic Earth in Is It Time to Storm the Bastille Again:
“That is, what Americans’ homes are worth, their equity, decreased by $7 trillion -from $20 trillion to $13 trillion, from spring 2006 to spring 2010. In the same period, mortgage debt, what Americans owe on their homes, went down by only $270 billion. Yes, that’s right: US homeowners lost more, by a factor of 26, than they “gained” through clearing mortgage debt. Thus, if we estimate that there are 75 million homeowners in America, they all, each and every one of them, lost $93,333.”
Nine out of ten Americans will notice that there is a significant gap that must be closed here. What makes it even more chilling is that the gap is continuing to widen as home prices continue to correct to the mean.
This debt must be resolved. There are two major ways to do it: repayment and default.
Repayment is probably a fantasy, if not beating a dead horse. The homeowners do not have the money with which to pay the loans given the current state of employment and wage stagnation, and the mortgages are for the most part on houses whose value is significantly under water compared to the debt, as in ‘ just mail in the keys.’
Straight up default, writing off the debt through principal adjustment, is also probably out of the question, because it would essentially vaporize the balance sheet of the US banking system which is also insolvent, to a greater degree than most understand, and if they understand it, would admit.
Automatic Earth references an essay which we also had linked here by Eric Sprott called Wither Green Shoots that points out the unfortunate fact that of the 986 bank holding companies in the US, 980 of them lost money last year. The lucky six were the TBTF banks on major government subsidy.
So, where is the government going to liquidate the debt? And what effect will it have on dollar assets when they do it?
The Japanese solution was to ignore their bad debt and insolvent kereitsu, because admitting it would cause significant loss of face, not to mention financial loss, to an elite that does not permit such things to happen. So instead they arranged for their single party LDP system to drag the debt like a ball and chain through what came to be known as ‘the lost decade’ while they tried to make it go away by export mercantilism and crony monetarism wherein funds were given to the same kereitsu in a remarkably ambitious (and expensively wasteful) series of public works boondoggles.
Do you think the US can follow this path? As if. Japan started from a base as a net exporter with a huge trade surplus and little debt. Scratch that idea.
Someone has to end up ‘holding the bag.’ And the consumer cannot rise to the occasion, the banks are all insolvent and a sinkhole until they change their business models. So what will be ‘the last bubble?’ Bernanke has managed to monetize about 1.5 trillion dollars so far. Only 5.5 trillion more to go, if housing prices can stabilize at current levels, and employment return to pre-crash levels quickly.
A few European readers have expressed their relief, and some noticeable pride, that their banking and political system resolved its own debt crisis so quickly and easily. To the extent that their banks are holding dollar denominated financial assets, they have merely stopped the table from shaking for the moment, as their sand castles await the next mega tsunami to come rolling across the Atlantic.
Consider this well, and you will understand what is happening in the economy, and why certain things occur over the next 24 months, despite the fog of wars, currency and otherwise.
It will be amazing, but it won’t be pretty. And it was all unnecessary, attributable to the dishonesty and greed of a remarkably small number of men in New York and Washington who managed to rig the markets and the political process, with the acquiescence and support of a public grown complacent and in far too many cases, soft headed and corrupt.
These are the same people, along with their enablers, who are now preaching the virtues of austerity for the many, and free and easy markets for themselves. All gain, no pain. While the game is going it must still be played.
Bernie Madoff was lying and cheating and taking money until the day he closed his doors.
Perhaps they are in denial, but surely they must hear the footsteps of history approaching. And their bravado is yet another bluff, and hides the rising stink of fear.
China May ‘Crash’ in Next 9 to 12 Months, Faber Says
China May ‘Crash’ in Next 9 to 12 Months, Faber Says
By Shiyin Chen and Haslinda Amin
May 3 (Bloomberg) — Investor Marc Faber said China’s economy will slow and possibly “crash” within a year as declines in stock and commodity prices signal the nation’s property bubble is set to burst.
The Shanghai Composite Index has failed to regain its 2009 high while industrial commodities and shares of Australian resource exporters are acting “heavy,” Faber said. The opening of the World Expo in Shanghai last week is “not a particularly good omen,” he said, citing a property bust and depression that followed the 1873 World Exhibition in Vienna.
“The market is telling you that something is not quite right,” Faber, the publisher of the Gloom, Boom & Doom report, said in a Bloomberg Television interview in Hong Kong today. “The Chinese economy is going to slow down regardless. It is more likely that we will even have a crash sometime in the next nine to 12 months.”
An index tracking Chinese stocks traded in Hong Kong dropped 1.8 percent today, the most in two weeks, after the central bank raised reserve requirements for the third time this year. The Shanghai Composite has slumped 12 percent this year, Asia’s worst performer, as policy makers seek to rein in a lending boom that’s spurred record gains in property prices. China’s markets are shut for a holiday today.
Copper touched a seven-week low and BHP Billiton Ltd., the world’s biggest mining company, fell the most since February on concern spending in the world’s third-largest economy will slow and after Australia boosted taxes on commodities producers. Rio Tinto Ltd., the third-largest, slid as much as 6 percent.
Chanos, Rogoff
Faber joins hedge fund manager Jim Chanos and Harvard University’s Kenneth Rogoff in warning of a crash in China.
China is “on a treadmill to hell” because it’s hooked on property development for driving growth, Chanos said in an interview last month. As much as 60 percent of the country’s gross domestic product relies on construction, he said. Rogoff said in February a debt-fueled bubble in China may trigger a regional recession within a decade.
The government has banned loans for third homes and raised mortgage rates and down-payment requirements for second-home purchases. Prices rose 11.7 percent across 70 cities in March from a year earlier, the most since data began in 2005.
The government has stopped short of raising interest rates to contain property prices. Within an hour of the central bank announcement on reserve ratios, Finance Minister Xie Xuren said that officials remained committed to expansionary policies to cement the nation’s recovery.
Stocks ‘Fully Priced’
The nation’s economy grew 11.9 percent in the first quarter, the fastest pace in almost three years. The government projects gross domestic product growth for the year of about 8 percent.
The clampdown on property speculation may prompt investors to turn to the nation’s stock market, Faber said. Still, shares are “fully priced” and Chinese investors may instead become “big buyers” of gold, he said.
BlackRock Inc. is among money managers reducing their holdings on Chinese stocks on expectations that economic growth has peaked. The BlackRock Emerging Markets Fund has widened its “underweight” position for China versus the MSCI Emerging Markets Index to about 7.5 percent from 4.6 percent at the end of March, the fund’s London-based co-manager Dan Tubbs said.
Industrial & Commercial Bank of China Ltd., China Construction Bank Corp. and Bank of China Ltd, the nation’s three largest banks, are trading near their lowest valuations on record as rising profits are eclipsed by concern bad loans will increase.
Local Governments
Citigroup Inc. warned in March that in a “worst case scenario,” the non-performing loans of local-government investment vehicles, used to channel money to stimulus projects, could swell to 2.4 trillion yuan by 2011.
Housing prices nationwide may fall as much as 20 percent in the second half of the year on government measures to curb speculation, BNP Paribas said April 23. Under a stress test conducted by the Shanghai branch of the China Banking Regulatory Commission in February, local banks’ ratio of delinquent mortgages would triple should home prices in the country’s commercial center decline 10 percent.
Shanghai is projecting as many as 70 million visitors to the $44 billion World Expo, more than 10 times the number who traveled to the 2008 Beijing Olympics. More than 433,000 people visited the 5.3 square-kilometer (3.3 square-mile) park on its first weekend.
To contact the reporter on this story: Shiyin Chen in Singapore at schen37@bloomberg.net
SP Futures Daily Chart
The Federal Reserve and the Administration seem intent on creating another bubble, or rather reflating an old one in US dollar heavy financial assets, in order to prolong the mother of all bubbles, the credit in US dollars bubble.
They are doing it selectively, with the banks carefully apportioning the excess liquidity into financial assets held by a relatively fewer amount of Americans who own stocks, while savers are heavily penalized.
When the credit bubble begins to totter things will become quite chaotic, and the panic this next time around may be terrific, dwarfing that so-easily forgotten repentance and regret of 2007-8. More than panic: hysteria.
I think it is now too late for a real reform. The Democrats have squandered their mandate from the people, and the Republicans are crony capitalists marching in lock step with the Banks, who seem to be in control once again. But I could be mistaken, and would be glad if I am.
When the US dollar and economy roll over it will make quite a wave that will swamp many boats. But these things take time. Once they start to happen, it moves slowly at first, but then gains a momentum and becomes almost unstoppable.
I am not quite sure how much water the USS Leviathan has already taken on, and how big the hole might be. But I firmly believe that the iceberg has been struck, the damage done, and the process has begun. The lifeboats are being quietly provisioned and reservations taken for the officers and crew, and the upper decks.
Again, these things take time, and there is always hope until the end. But there is less and less that can be done as the process continues to unfold, with no serious repairs, and only distractions for the passengers, and encouragingly false announcements, from the bridge.
Clinton Once Again Redefining The Word "IS"
Clinton Once Again Redefining The Word “IS”
Posted by Karl Denninger
You have to love Dear Old Bill:
April 18 (Bloomberg) — Former President Bill Clinton said he should have pushed for regulation of financial derivatives when he was president, rejecting the advice of top economic advisers Robert (I am Citibank) Rubin and Larry (I nearly bankrupted Harvard) Summers.
The argument was that derivatives didn’t need transparency because they were “expensive and sophisticated and only a handful of people would buy them,” Clinton said on ABC’s “This Week” program. “The flaw in this argument was that first of all, sometimes people with a lot of money make stupid decisions and make it without transparency.”
Clinton also said that Republicans who controlled Congress would have stopped him from trying to regulate derivatives. “I wish I had been caught trying,” Clinton said. “I mean, that was a mistake I made.”
Uh huh.
Mr. Bill. You do remember this little law PL 106-102, 113 Stat 1338, right?
Do you remember it’s title and the date it was enacted?
Yes, you did sign it Mr. Clinton on November 12th, 1999, and in doing so you retroactively made legal an unlawful merger of two companies that your fabulous former Fed Chairman, Alan Greenspan, intentionally allowed to occur (and granted a waiver for which he had no lawful authority to give), remember?
The law in question is otherwise known as Gramm-Leach-Bliley.
Without it the disastrous derivatives mess could not have happened, because regulated banks with access to The Fed window, not to mention FDIC depositor protection, could not have engaged in derivative trades.
Let us also remember that your Treasury Secretary, Robert Rubin (who you claim gave you “wrong” advice) resigned as Treasury Secretary and brokered the deal to pass GLBA. While doing so he was allegedly in secret negotiations to become the head of Citigroup, the direct and proximate beneficiary of making their merger retroactively legal.
IF you want to try to repair your legacy on this account what you need to do is press for the repeal of Gramm-Leach-Bliley, making it your singular political focus until it is both achieved and every institution that operates in this nation in violation of Glass-Steagall (which would be effectively re-imposed) is broken up.
GLBA was nothing more or less than a license to loot this nation and Mr. Rubin was personally and deeply involved in its passage for both his own and Citi’s corporate benefit. It was and is a shining monument to the colossal corruption and outrageous kleptocracy that became the mantra of The United States under your Presidency and has continued since to this day.
You are 100% responsible for this mess Mr. Clinton, and I, along with many others, have absolutely zero intention of ever letting anyone forget that.
A little visual aid here:

Without Bill’s signature on Gramm-Leach-Bliley, investment bankers never would ahve had access to piles of federally-insured deposits. Without access to this pile of money, the investment bankers couldn’t have purchased derivatives. Derivatives are where the CDO’s and CDS’s live and these are the vehicles that banks used to offload their worthless garbage (risky mortgages) onto the greater investment community.
The housing bubble was impossible to blow without Clinton’s signature on GLBA. That nice little parabolic move there that started in 1999 would have been impossible without the investment banks having access to depositor funds and FDIC backstops for their derivatives book. Without the GLBA that repealed the heart of Glass-Steagall, we wouldn’t be where we are right now.
The Weakest Bang for our Wilting Dollar – How we Overpaid for the Bailouts and were left with a Wilting Economy Propped up by Government Spending. Paying $446,000 Per Loan Modification and $43,000 for Homes that were already going to be Purchased.
Posted by mybudget360
So much horrible policy has occurred since the economy entered recession that the majority of Americans are shell shocked with each day of news. It used to be that a billion dollars in toxic assets was enough to garner some movement out of the market. Now, we talk about trillion dollar deficits as if they were normal. Take for example the ridiculous home buyer tax credit. Let us set aside for a second that massive home buying and speculation led us into this financial crisis in the first place. The home buyer tax credit was basically a gift to people for doing something they were already going to do. Keep in mind that even without the tax credit, people were going to buy homes. But this is what we are left with:
“(Las Vegas Sun) It’s awful policy,” says Andrew Jakabovics, associate director for housing and economics at the liberal Center for American Progress. “It’s incredibly expensive. It’s not well targeted.”
…
“We paid $8,000 to at least 1.5 million people to do something they were going to do anyway,” Jakabovics says.
…
“A heck of a lot of people would have bought the house anyway,” says Ted Gayer, an economist at the Brookings Institution.
…
The tax break, due to expire at the end of November, is on track to cost $15 billion, twice what Congress had planned. In other words, it will cost $43,000 for every new homebuyer who would not have bought a house without the tax break.”
This is policy gone bad like milk left out on a hot sunny day. In many parts of the country $43,000 will buy someone a home or a condo. Instead, we will blow through $15 billion to encourage people to buy something they were already going to buy. This is the kind of policy that we have had for decades. But the game is hitting a massive wall. For the first time in record keeping history household debt has contracted on a year over year basis:
Much of this comes from American households pulling back on spending but also, banks refusing to lend. In fact, the bailouts have done nothing that they were promised to do. First, the banking bailout was quoted as a necessity to keep liquidity in the system. To the contrary, liquidity is being pulled out of the system. Wall Street and their corporate public relations machines would like to convince you that banks are now having to be tighter with their lending given market conditions. It is amazing how in midsentence banks are able to shape-shift their position to always maximize their own profits but only after they have secured taxpayer money. If we really wanted to increase liquidity why don’t we just send each family $10,000 to get the economy going? Is this any less preposterous than paying $43,000 for someone to buy a home they were already going to buy?
If you think that spending more and more and financing each purchase with debt is good for the long-term health of our economy, just look at the following:
Over the last 25 years the U.S. dollar has been cut in half and U.S. households are feeling the effects of this. We would have felt this earlier in 2000 if it weren’t for the massive housing bubble that was ignited by the Federal Reserve and its spawn investment banks. All of a sudden, instead of spending money we had and protecting home equity houses became ATMs:
Source: Center for Retirement Research, Boston College
So even though incomes were stagnant for the decade, the average person on the street thought they were experiencing prosperity but all they were enjoying was a lease on a lifestyle that was no longer supported by underlying fundamentals. Most Americans are now dealing with this as they see credit card access shut down and access to home equity is gone since home prices have collapsed. Yet the only sector that seems to be back on its feet is the banking sector. Or to clarify, the too big to fail banking sector seems to be fine. Underemployment is still over 17 percent, credit is still pulling back, and states are still seeing faltering revenues:
Source: The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government
Tax collections are a good indicator of the economy since they are derived from working people. Looking at the stock market is like looking at someone who just hit blackjack 10 times in a row. At a certain point it needs to reflect reality. Yet the way we structured the bailouts was as absurd as the three page memo former Treasury Sectary Hank Paulson handed to Congress requesting $700 billion to clean up the toxic assets. That price tag now sounds cheap! And guess what? The toxic assets are still here which is only more proof that banks are two-faced liars that will siphon off every penny from the productive sector of the economy. As it turned out the $700 billion figure was simply pulled out of thin air by dividing ten percent of GDP ($1.4 trillion) in half according to the former interim Assistant Treasury Secretary Neel Kashkari:
“(WaPo) In Washington, he used his BlackBerry to determine the bailout sum presented to Congress. His arithmetic: “We have $11 trillion residential mortgages, $3 trillion commercial mortgages. Total $14 trillion. Five percent of that is $700 billion. A nice round number.”
Looking back, he says, he is more confident about the two-by-sixes.
“Seven hundred billion was a number out of the air,” Kashkari recalls, wheeling toward the hex nuts and the bolts. “It was a political calculus. I said, ‘We don’t know how much is enough. We need as much as we can get [from Congress]. What about a trillion?’ ‘No way,’ Hank shook his head. I said, ‘Okay, what about 700 billion?’ We didn’t know if it would work. We had to project confidence, hold up the world. We couldn’t admit how scared we were, or how uncertain.”
So what a shocker that GDP increased by over 5 percent when all was said and done. It would have been a surprise if it hadn’t. Yet where did the money go? The vast majority into the stock market casino. Was there any massive targeted effort for job creation? Or what about reforming the financial industry that led us here? None of that was accomplished. So today, we have spent or committed $13 trillion on the financial sector with no strings attached. It is the biggest bank robbery in history and it is happening under our noses. In fact, people are pulling $700 billion out of thin air apparently just like Goldman Sachs needed every penny from AIG.
Most are familiar with the GDP equation:
GDP = private consumption + gross investment + government spending + (exports ? imports)
Right now the biggest factor boosting GDP is government spending. Yet as we have seen with the home buyer tax credit, other programs have been a waste as well. Take the HAMP program as well backed by $75 billion. So far, only 168,000 permanent loan modifications have occurred. So run those numbers:
$75 billion / 168,000 = $446,428 per modification
Now of course, the program still has money left for additional modifications and other gifts to the banks like aiding in short sales. But do that math. With $75 billion we could have bought 750,000 homes for $100,000 each. Policy is so bad right now, we’d be better off just giving the money directly to the people to do whatever they wanted. Ironically this would stimulate the economy more than continuing down a road of expensive policy that is merely a method of transferring wealth to the banking elite.
The weaker dollar is a symptom of a bigger problem. The inefficient bailouts are a symptom of a bigger problem. Our government being controlled by Wall Street is merely the ultimate conclusion of four decades of egregious mismanagement and corporate welfare. If the government won’t do what is obviously right to reform the system then average Americans are left to wonder who is going to reign in Wall Street?
Game Over for the American Middle Class – Inflation Adjusted Wages up 20 Percent in Last 20 Years While Housing Costs are up 56 Percent and Healthcare Costs are up 155 Percent.
Posted by mybudget360
The struggle for average Americans to keep up is largely becoming an act of will power and force in this current grand recession. Now you wouldn’t think that there is a definite war raging against the middle class if you simply follow the mainstream media but the facts speak to a more distilled and corporatized method of debt slavery. Americans are working more hours trying to stay in the same place that they believe would keep them on pace to having the American Dream. And this dream is merely the ability to afford a home, provide your children with a good education (public or private), and save enough to have a retirement that doesn’t require you to eat cat food after a lifetime of working. That is at the root of what most average Americans would want after a full working career.
But we are at an inflexion point and the middle class is largely being squeezed out. A recent study from the Commerce Department shed some light on an issue that we already know. Over the past 20 years the middle class has been falling behind:
Everything is relative in this world. Incomes have gone up during this time but the cost of housing, healthcare, and access to education have outpaced income gains in some cases by four to one. Money is only worth what you can buy with it. The grand housing bubble of this decade lured many into buying homes that they simply could not afford. Banks and Wall Street were more than willing to provide access to this dream since they knew if all bets crashed, and they did, that they would call on their connected politicians to bail them out and send the bill to taxpayers for their adventures in finance. Take a look at the chart above closely. Housing price changes have wiped out any gains in income. The relative amount of income needed to buy a home has put many two income households on the brink of bankruptcy. And the 4 million foreclosure filings in 2009 alone tell us that many Americans are unable to hold onto one cornerstone of the American Dream.
The middle class is absolutely vital to having a sustainable and flourishing economy. The massive debt machine coming from the big banks has created a new form of debt servitude. Some would argue that this is a personal responsibility issue and I will be the first to agree with that. People should live within their means. But think of the FICO score that has become like a permanent financial report card. Some employers actually screen for credit scores before hiring applicants. Want to rent a home because you don’t want to over extend and buy a home? You better hope that FICO is up to par. And many insurance companies base their analysis on this score. So even if you never had a credit card or any debt, you would be in a bad spot because so many people rely on this number. This is only one example of how people are actually forced to use debt simply to pursue the avenues of the middle class.
In fact, we have many more people simply trying to stay afloat let alone pursuing the middle class ideal. Over 37 million Americans are now part of the food stamp program, not only is this the highest number ever but also the highest percentage of Americans ever to be on food assistance:
I sometimes read gut wrenching stories from the Great Depression where people would wash and reuse paper towels or have soup for weeks on end just to keep their families fed. 37 million Americans would be one step away from that existence if it weren’t for some basic safety nets. It is troubling to say the least that this patch is what is keeping this great recession from being a profound depression. Yet I think the 27 million underemployed Americans are already in that state of mind. The idea of a middle class life is slowly drifting away as each and every day we realize that our nation is becoming more of a corporatacracy.
The housing nightmare really played on both ends of this middle class dream. Banks were more than willing to lend trillions of dollars to people that really could not afford the homes they were buying. This created the biggest housing bubble the world has ever witnessed and the bursting ramifications are being felt throughout the economy. Yet if you look at the equation, who is really being punished? Average Americans are being punished as they have their homes foreclosed on. Yet banks who are in the supposed position of financial experts, have not only garnered trillions in bailouts but are now back to their speculative ways. This is disturbing because it is highlighting a marked shift and a near game over for the middle class.
Think of the rise of our economy in the 1940s and 1950s. Many returning GIs had access to affordable education through new programs and grants. It is the least you can offer to someone defending this country. Next, it was possible to support a family with one income because we had a strong and sustainable manufacturing base. Now, we have families with two incomes in the service sector trying to piece things together. Throw in a child, and that second income evaporates through childcare costs and educational fees. In other words, just because people have more income their buying power has collapsed.
And this fact is revealed in the data that two-income households are more of an economic necessity:
So of married couples with two children 76 percent have two earners. The average American is simply working to stay on track or face being thrown off the treadmill. Jobs are so important to keeping a solid middle class. This should be obvious but current policy being driven by the corporatacracy is simply focusing on keeping prices inflated for the big ticket items (i.e., housing and healthcare). At this point in the game, housing values have gone up to points that are clearly unsupportable:
This being the biggest budget item for most households, you would assume that lower prices would be welcomed from the government seeing that many Americans are underemployed and those with jobs have seen stagnant wages.
The middle class dream is at risk. This is a question of what we want out of our country. Are we simply obsessed on keeping home values inflated so banking giants could keep gaming accounting rules and claim billion dollar profits? If we want to prosper in the next decade, there will need to be a radical change to preserve what once was envied by the world. Otherwise, you can expect banks and their political allies to keep selling away the middle class of America. On the path we are traveling on the middle class is largely at risk for a big game over in the next decade.















