Archive for the ‘California’ Category
Loss Of The Rule Of Law (Arson in LA)

A Los Angeles Fire Department firefighter is shown at a fire in West Hollywood, Calif., on Friday Dec.30, 2011. (Mike Meadows/AP Photo)
A rash of arson fires in the dark of night set Los Angeles on edge over New Year’s Eve, and authorities deployed hundreds of extra firefighters, patrol cars, undercover officers and helicopters to stop the attacks.
On Saturday night, firefighters rushed to multiple fires, quickly extinguishing a vehicle fire in a Hollywood carport and responding to another in the massive parking structure at Hollywood Boulevard and Highland Avenue. Those blazes followed at least 38 other suspicious fires between Thursday night and Saturday morning, making it the worst wave of arson since the 1992 riots.
“Whoever is doing this is really messing with people’s lives,” said Los Angeles Fire Capt. Jamie Moore.
This is probably one deranged individual with a penchant for fire.
Probably.
But while you’re sipping your beverage of choice this evening, consider again that while this is probably one deranged individual there are millions of screwed-over individuals that have taken it in the backside from the big banksters who have, incidentally, gone without prosecution. Indeed, our own President claims that “no laws were broken.”
Oh really?
Hmmm… perjury is a violation of the law. How many perjured affidavits were filed in foreclosure cases?
Fraud is a violation of the law. How many investors and others got rooked in various schemes and scams over the last few years?
Money laundering is a violation of the law too. I seem to remember a “deferred prosecution agreement” instead of handcuffs and prison sentences.
Don’t be fooled by the claim that the injured are all “sophisticated investors” who should know better. Were all the farmers who got hosed in the MF Global collapse “sophisticated investors” or were they trying to make a living growing corn, wheat or soybeans so you’d have something to eat and were simply trying to lock a decent price for their crop to be delivered in a few months?
Or how about Jefferson County Alabama? Over 650,000 people got screwed by that fiasco born out of bribery, corruption and graft, and that’s not an allegation — there have been convictions and jail sentences handed out but the screwing remains!
Nobody wants to see anarchy that has a hint of intelligence. It is a nasty, ugly business and is utterly indefensible. But this Ticker isn’t about what you want. It’s about facing the potential of what is, and if it happens, why it happened so you’re prepared to demand political heads roll — before people start taking actions that lead to literal heads on pikes.
I’m concerned. Everyone has a breaking point. If just one tenth of one percent of the population of Jefferson County was pissed off enough and got hosed badly enough to rage against the machine by lighting fires, there would be 650 arsonists in that one county alone!
I can’t imagine what Birmingham would look like under such a scenario, yet 1/10th of one percent is a tiny, minuscule percentage. It’s nothing.
We have history to look to in this nation in that regard; the strikes of 1877 are an interesting case study in that a large number of people basically lost everything, and once they did, they simply “lost it.”
The complete and utter refusal of the state and federal authorities, from the top down, to prosecute bogus deals and frauds that were the hallmark of the second half of the 2000s, letting the statute of limitations run and making speeches claiming that “nobody did anything illegal” is the epitome of stupidity. Those uttering such nonsense on both sides of the aisle are malignant pustules on the ass of our nation’s government and the risks they are taking when it comes to civil order and our way of life are utterly indefensible.
Perhaps this gamble will “win”, in that there will be no significant number of people who lose everything and are also either mentally unstable or just simply pissed off enough to not care about the consequences (up to and including their own death) that come with going on such a rampage.
But beyond the fact that intentional injustice of the sort we’ve witnessed is never defensible on ethical grounds, don’t you think this is a rather dangerous gamble to be taking with the economic and other tensions in our country today?
It’s All Violent Demonstrators (Bull%#it!) #OWS
Shooting a peacefully-walking cameraman who is filming a police line from a clear and respectful distance — there is no violent action visible in the film anywhere — is felony assault if you or I do it.
Why isn’t the cop who did this under arrest?
Stop calling this sort of incident “brutality” and start calling it what the clear video evidence appears to show: A felony.
To The Oakland PD (And Others)
I know, I know, some of you in law enforcement probably hate me plenty. After all, I’ve run a number of pictures and videos of you committing acts that were I to do the same thing you’d haul my ass off in irons.
You should be in jail for those acts, and that’s a fact.
But before you go off and commit another felony, er, “fire another rubber bullet at a cameraman“, I want you to step back for just a minute and ponder this.
Then I want you to fact-check it, because I’m right and I’m offering to save your (financial) ass and I don’t even want anything from you for the favor.
You’ve been robbed just like the rest of the 99%.
Specifically: Your pensions are not going to be paid.
Got that? They’re NOT going to be paid.
Why am I sure of this? Because they can’t be paid. It is mathematically impossible for you to get the money and health care you were promised. You were lied to by the very people who now “order” you to go shoot rubber bullets at peaceful people wielding….. cameras.
That’s right ladies and gentlemen in blue: You are getting screwed too, and you probably don’t realize it at this point.
But you will.
State and local governments have less than one-fifth of the funds to maintain the infrastructure that exists today.
They not only lied to you, they’ve lied to everyone else in our communities as well.
About a year and a half ago at a “Tea Party” event we had some political speakers trying to stump up votes for themselves. They were running for county commission – the people who make the decisions for the local area. You probably know your county commissioners by name.
I stuck my hand up at one point and asked “When am I going to own my house?”
There was an awkward silence; the candidate didn’t understand the question. He thought I was talking about having trouble paying my mortgage, of course.
I wasn’t: I was talking about the fact that if I stop paying property tax at any point I get evicted by the county. In effect I do not own my house; I rent it from the county.
The consternation was considerable, but this is the point you see: The usual means of financing things like the road you drive your cop car on is through a bond issue that has a maturity longer than the road will last, and what’s worse is that the only revenue raised during that time pays just the interest!
Then the road needs repaved, and… we float another bond, with the first one still outstanding.
I know, you folks in the PD think I’m kidding. The local folks would never screw you like that, right? After all, you keep the community “safe”.
You’re wrong. They not only would, they already have. A local example from my area will make this clear. Our local School Board asked for a half-cent sales tax increase to pay for roof and refrigerator replacements in the schools. Sounds ordinary, right?
Well, it’s not. See, The Board had already taken the money they should have put aside for this and blown it on other things. How do we know this? Because roofs and refrigerators have known design lives — you know this from your own house! Your refer wears out and so does your roof. So you should be saving 1/20th (or whatever) of the cost of a new roof or refer every year; this way in the 20th year you have the money to pay for the replacement.
Instead of doing that the School Board blew the money on something else — with these known costs and exposures in the future — then cried poor mouth when the inevitable happened.
Isolated incident? No. Look at the Mid-Bay Bridge here in Niceville. Or if you wish the Garcon Point Bridge over near Pensacola. Same situation; the latter already has effectively defaulted, the former inevitably will, as it too cannot cover the bond issues in principal and interest off the bridge tolls. There’s no rational projection of traffic levels that will allow it to do so and yet in the former case they’re still spending more money they don’t have extending the bridge access road!
The same is true of your pensions.
You’re not going to get them unless you’re scheduled to retire in the next couple of years. Down the road this is a certainty, because these pension funds are assuming 8% or so net returns. That’s idiotic; the stock market has made a grand total of nothing over the last decade, yet at an 8% return it should have increased in value by 115%!
You’re going to get stiffed.
I guarantee it.
Some of you will retort “but we’re guaranteed that money by our state constitution!” My answer is simple: There is no way that taxes can rise to a sufficient degree to pay for these promises. It’s simply not possible for the people to pay that much in tax, and thus they won’t.
So why are you working for people who are financially raping you? They’re lying — you’re not going to get paid what you were promised as it is mathematically impossible just as those bond issues will never get paid off as they’re effectively “interest only” loans that are for a longer duration than the alleged “improvement” will last! The entire scheme on the bonds works so long as they can be “rolled” at maturity. When they can’t — and eventually the lenders will refuse to stack more debt upon bad debt — the entire game comes apart.
Our entire economy at the Federal, State and Local government levels is a gigantic series of Ponzi schemes in this regard. Medicare is the worst of all; between it and Social Security they have a forward liability of close to $100 trillion dollars, or more than six times the size of the entire economy. If you have allegiance to The Constitution and Rule of Law you should be arresting the politicians and banksters, not the people.
If your allegiance is simply to your own self-interest you should walk off the job, because no police or firefighters union can make money appear that doesn’t exist, and your promised funds do not exist.
I don’t expect you to believe me. Go pull the numbers on your favorite bond-financed “street improvement” project or similar item in your area. Get the design life of that improvement and figure out the tax money that will fund payment of the debt. I’m willing to bet that if you randomly pick on ten projects of this sort that the vast majority of them have incomplete and many will have no coverage of the principal, which means the debt will never go away — it will get ever-larger until it inevitably consumes all funding, making the payment of your promised benefits impossible.
Do your own diligence, ask your own questions. Demand answers in facts and figures, not “oh you’ll get your money.” Make them prove it — and if they can’t (trust me — you’ll find that they can’t) you might want to consider exactly what you’re doing out there every day with that rubber-round-stuffed shotgun.
You’re making an effort toward your own family’s financial destruction!
If you won’t listen to me, listen to Roger Waters…..
Then cross the lines or, if you just can’t….. simply walk off.
OWS Demonstrator Run Over Speaks Out
Evidence: Infiltrators Attempted To Coopt Occupy Oakland #OWS #TCOT
Ah, something the far right doesn’t bother with…… evidence.
- The Black Bloc (what the “Oakland Liberation Front” mimics) is an intentionally disruptive tactic which has infiltrated and radicalized protests world wide. The core principles and tactics are: Vandalism, rioting, and street fighting. The Occupy Wall Street demonstrations, ongoing protests, and movement on the whole has defined itself in self stating principles at every assembly from the very beginning as “non violent”. Search Google for Black Bloc to find out what it is. Here, I’ll do it for you. It will probably look like the photos you’ll see all day on the sensationalist corporate owned media that is trying to divert the message away from corporate influence and corruption in government:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=black+bloc&gs_sm=e&gs_upl=1081059l1082734l0l1083007l10l7l0l1l1l0l123l686l2.5l8l0&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.,cf.osb&biw=1055&bih=974&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi
Here’s the problem: It didn’t work very well. The link above shows a couple of examples, and I saw a couple more on the network feeds I was watching yesterday. I saw demonstrators link arms and form human walls to prevent attacks on property – at personal risk to themselves. There’s video evidence here that the handful engaged in this activity were actively stopped with proportionate physical force — only that necessary to suppress (as opposed to simply beating the hell out of people.)
This is also consistent with what I saw in real time.
Anyone who claims that the presence of a few people who infiltrate a peaceful group and stir up crap somehow taints the entire organization must, to be fair, then call the entire Tea Party a bunch of dope-dealing felons, since a handful of infiltrators have also incited and committed various criminal acts on the other side!
For instance, felony election fraud in Michigan, felony fraud charges in NY, violence at a Tea Party rally in Fort Lauderdale and if you like dope dealers a Tea Party leader in Indiana was charged with that offense too.
Yet you haven’t — and won’t — hear me allege that the Tea Party (in its various forms) is in some way condoning crime of various forms, including dope dealing and violent demonstrations.
That’s because they’re not, any more than Occupy {whatever} is.
It just simply isn’t true folks. Were it true these agitators would have immediately turned this demonstration into an all-on riot. The opportunity and density of people necessary was certainly there, if the people demonstrating were disposed to do so — there was little or no police presence and literally nothing other than the desire of the demonstrators that kept the demonstration almost-entirely peaceful. Were that not true Oakland would have been sacked last night.
Were the criminals in the crowd? Yes. There are at the local beach too on any given Sunday.
That doesn’t make the entire group of people on the beach crooks.
I have said since the beginning of this movement that if I discern that it has violent intent that my position will shift instantly.
So will virtually everyone else’s, and in my opinion it should.
Thus far the evidence to support such a position is entirely absent and evidence to the contrary — that these demonstrations are lawful and peaceful expressions protected under The First Amendment — is overwhelming.
The true test of whether you actually believe in the fundamental right of free speech and peaceful assembly comes when the person(s) exercising it express an opinion that you personally disagree with.
You see, nobody ever tries to censor speech or shut down assemblies they agree with.
Bill Still: State Banks
A bill to form a blue-ribbon commission to study the feasibility of a state-owned bank for California has suddenly and unexpectedly cleared both houses of the California legislature and now awaits Governor Jerry Brown’s signature. Californians need to contact the Governor and urge him to sign this, the first successful public banking initiative in nearly 100 years.
A state bank can allow states to pay ZERO interest on loans for state projects such as infrastructure. North Dakota’s state bank, established in 1919, has allowed the state of North Dakota to be the ONLY state to keep a budget surplus since the economic crisis began, North Dakota also has the lowest unemployment rate at 3.5%, the lowest credit card default rate and one of the lowest tax rates in the country.
While there have been other state bank models that have failed, primarily because they were structured in such a way as to allow the state government to pick and choose to whom loans would be given, the State Bank of North Dakota’s model does not do this. The government has absolutely no say with regards to who gets the loans; so, the government does not pick winners or losers. It is these failed models that have given state banking a bad rap over the past few decades. State banking does not have to be this way. The North Dakota model is the model to follow.
Could It Be? More Handcuffs?
California Atty. Gen. Kamala Harris, saying that years of unscrupulous lending still haunts the state, is creating a 25-person task force to target mortgage fraud of any size — from small operations that preyed on troubled borrowers to corporations that sold risky loans as safe investments.
Aha. Now we’re seeing something useful. Gee Kamala, why did it take this long? And can I ask whether you’ve figured out how to get around the pesky statute of limitations problems?
• Corporate fraud, including instances in which bundled mortgages were sold as securities to the state or its pension funds under false pretenses. Harris said her office plans to prosecute some cases under California’s False Claims Act, which she described as “one of those very powerful tools that California uniquely has … to pursue, in essence, what are false claims that are submitted to the state.”
It’s called “control fraud” Kamala. Go ask Bill Black about it; he wrote the book. Literally. And he was entitled to, seeing as he prosecuted and jailed something like 1,000 banksters last time around during the S&L mess.
• Scams, including instances in which consultants, lawyers and others took fees from people in foreclosure, saying they would help the homeowners get loan modifications or other remedies, but delivered nothing.
That’s a target-rich environment.
• Fraudulent lending practices, including deceptive marketing, failure to fully disclose loan terms and qualifying people for loans who couldn’t afford the terms.
You mean the wonderful models that were designed for one and only one purpose: To force serial refinancing so as to generate fee income, all propelled on the back of two presumptions:
-
House prices would rise forever, and therefore the bank could simply steal the appreciation by constructing a loan that would effectively guarantee your reappearance in their office in two or three years.
-
If the first didn’t happen, the bank didn’t care as they had sold off the bad loan to someone else, claiming it was a good loan. We know this factually happened because Citibank’s former Chief Risk Officer testified under oath before the FCIC that 80% of their loans written in 2007 did not meet quality standards. Yet they sold them onward anyway.
She goes on with:
“We are looking at a situation of up to $640 billion in wealth having been lost because of this wave of foreclosures that has hit the state,” Harris said, referring to the decline in homeowner equity.
It’s not quite that simple. See, the so-called “equity” was never really there is in the first place. You can’t lose what you never had, or to put it another way, the fraud caused the “equity increase”; discovery of it, and the deflating of the bubble simply removed that which was falsely claimed to have occurred.
But that’s wordsmithing.
Many Wall Street financial institutions — private equity firms, hedge funds and banks — bundled often poor-quality mortgage loans into securities during the boom years and sold them to major investors, including pension funds. That resulted in billions of dollars in losses when borrowers defaulted on the loans, triggering the financial crisis.
There’s nothing wrong with making dangerous loans and selling them. It only becomes illegal when you lie about what’s in the box. If you tell someone that the box is full of used dog food, that’s legal.
But what would anyone pay for a box of used dog food, as opposed to one full of premium chocolates?
Ah, there’s the problem you see.
Presented properly to a jury, given the under oath statements already made, it shouldn’t be that tough.
It’s not about inability to prove the case – it’s about political will to go after institutions that have formed some of the biggest campaign funding sources over the last decade.
The announcement is good, but as always the proof is in the follow-through.
CA Attorney: The State Bar Helps The Banks Steal People's Homes

In a stunning letter to members of the California State Bar and a California Judge, Michael T. Pines sets forth a damning (and supported) assertion against the big banks.
There is little doubt the “banks” through their attorneys are behind the attacks on me, and since they can’t win in court they had to try to stop me other ways by trying to prevent me from representing property owners. If you are not happy, contact the Bar, others, and tell every attorney you know to hold off on paying their dues as long as possible.
In conclusion, his letter ends:
The Bar and Courts are now, and will, go bankrupt. It is only a matter of time. The courts are broken, the economy is broken, and the government is broken and all are run by the Banks. That is the bigger picture and this won’t go on forever. In the long run, your children will be O.K. In the short run, it is going to be awful. In my opinion, there is going to be a collapse of historic proportions.
Be sure to read the entire letter.
h/t MSFraud








