FedUpUSA

Archive for the ‘Fraud’ Category

You knew this was coming…

Feb. 6 (Bloomberg) — Bank of America Corp., JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Wells Fargo & Co. made a last minute demand that New York drop claims filed against them Feb. 3 as a condition of a $25 billion nationwide settlement over foreclosure abuses, a person familiar with the matter said.

The deadline for states to sign the proposed deal is today. The push by the three banks raised a new obstacle in getting New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s support for the deal, said the person. Schneiderman, along with the attorneys general of California, Nevada and Delaware, has voiced concerns about the terms of the accord.

Now we’ll see what sort of balls Schneiderman has.

This is what should happen — Schneiderman should tell them to go to hell.  If the other states want to settle, that’s fine, but for the banksters to play this sort of hostage game — well, it simply can’t be allowed to stand.

One would hope that Nevada’s AG, which recently passed a law that requires foreclosing parties to certify under penalty of felony indictment that they have the proper paperwork and chain of title before foreclosing, would also erect the middle finger.

Interestingly enough since that law went into effect rendering any false or robosigned filing a criminal felony (and $5,000 fine for each document) offense new foreclosure filings have effectively ceased by these very same banks. Never mind the 606 count indictment that came out of the Nevada AG’s office shortly thereafter.

Is that an admission that the banks don’t have proper title to the notes and can’t document proper procedure?  Good question.

But this much is certain — Schneiderman, California AG Kamala Harris and Deleware’s Beau Biden, along with Nevada and New York all ought to tell these banks to stick it.

Why?

That’s simple — those who were illegally foreclosed won’t get much if anything at all out of this deal, and the so-called “principal forgiveness” isn’t worth the paper it’s written on.  Those deals will be preferentially handed out to protect the banks’ second lines, doing little or nothing for the vast majority of the borrowers.

Worse, none of the proposed settlement will do a damn thing to address the harm that has been done or extract punishment.  And it is punishment that is needed — punishment so severe that nobody will ever think of doing it again.  We already have a so-called “settlement” with regard to wrongful foreclosures and similar with regard to Countrywide, and while it was supposed to grant billions in relief to homeowners it has both brought almost no actual help and not been enforced.

One of the key un-addressed issues is the fact that our land title system has been corrupted beyond belief by these institutions.  This must be fixed, and it is the banks who must fix it and spend whatever it takes to do so.  Every single assignment and mortgage has to be audited and cleared through either to the trust it is in or an admission must be made that it was never forwarded and the trusts are in fact empty artifices.  If the latter has occurred en-masse, and it certainly appears it has, people need to go to prison and those who bought these instruments in good faith and are holding empty boxes must be made whole.  If this collapses the major financial institutions in this country then so be it — we cannot have a nation where being a “big company” means you can literally blow farts at the law any time you please.

The worst part of this is not just that the FBI warned early in the decade of an epidemic of fraud, or that property appraisers sent a petition warning of the same thing.  Oh no, there was actually an investigation at Fannie that showed these practices were rampant — including robosigning — in 2003.

This is a decade-long, and perhaps longer, outrage. The entities involved must be held to account.  A decade or more of abuse of the public is not compensated for with $25 billion, with the firms involved going about their business in the usual “cost of doing business” sort of handslap.  This apparent organized set of actions, recklessly (at best) or even intentionally taken calls for recession of banking licenses and revocation of corporate charters, along with indictments where still possible under the statute of limitations.

Nothing less will do.

Why the AGs Must Not Settle: Robo-signing Is Just the Tip of the Iceberg

A foreclosure settlement between five major banks guilty of “robo-signing” and the attorneys general of the 50 states is pending for Monday, February 6^th; but it is still not clear if all the AGs will sign.  California was to get over half of the $25 billion in settlement money, and California AG Kamala Harris has withstood pressure to settle. 

That is good.  She and the other AGs should not sign until a thorough investigation has been conducted.  The evidence to date suggests that “robo-signing” was not a mere technical default or sloppy business practice but was part and parcel of a much larger fraud, the fraud that brought down the whole economy in 2008.  It is not just distressed homeowners but the entire economy that has paid the price, resulting in massive unemployment and a shrunken tax base, throwing state and local governments into insolvency and forcing austerity measures and cutbacks in government services across the nation.

The details of the robo-signing scam were spelled out in my last article, here.  The robo-signing fraud and its implications are expanded on below.

Why All the Robo-signing?

Over half the homes in the country are now held in the name of an electronic database called MERS—Mortgage Electronic Registration Services.  MERS is a smokescreen behind which mortgages were sold to trusts that sold them to investors.  The mortgages were chopped into pieces and sold as “mortgage-backed securities” (MBS), which traded in a supposedly liquid market.  That meant the investors could sell them in the money market at any time on a day’s notice.  Yale economist Gary Gorton gives this example:

Suppose the institutional investor is Fidelity, and Fidelity has $500 million in cash that will be used to buy securities, but not right now. Right now Fidelity wants a safe place to earn interest, but such that the money is available in case the opportunity for buying securities arises. Fidelity goes to Bear Stearns and “deposits” the $500 million overnight for interest. What makes this deposit safe? The safety comes from the collateral that Bear Stearns provides. Bear Stearns holds some asset‐backed securities [with] a market value of $500 millions. These bonds are provided to Fidelity as collateral. Fidelity takes physical possession of these bonds. Since the transaction is overnight, Fidelity can get its money back the next morning, or it can agree to “roll” the trade. Fidelity earns, say, 3 percent.

That is where the robo-signing came in.  Foreclosure defense attorneys armed with the tools of discovery have discovered that robo-signing — involving falsified signatures assigning mortgages back to the trusts allegedly owning them — occurred not just occasionally or randomly but in virtually every case.  Why?  Because the mortgages had to be left free to be bought and sold on a daily basis in the money market by investors.  The investors are not interested in making 30 year loans.  They want something short-term with immediate rights of withdrawal like a deposit account.

The Hazards of Borrowing Short to Lend Long

The problem is that when panicked investors all exercise that right at once, there is no cheap funding available to back the 30 year mortgage loans, rendering the banks insolvent.  And that is what happened on September 15, 2008, when Lehman Brothers, a major investment bank like Bear Stearns, went bankrupt.

According to Representative Paul Kanjorski, speaking on C-SPAN in January 2009, the collapse of Lehman Brothers precipitated a $550 billion run on the money market funds.  A report by the Joint Economic Committee pointed to the fact that the $62 billion Reserve Primary Fund had “broken the buck” (fallen below a stable $1 per share) due to its Lehman investments.  The massive bank run that followed was the dire news that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson presented to Congress behind closed doors, prompting Congressional approval of Paulson’s $700 billion bank bailout despite deep misgivings.

The sleight of hand that brought the banking system down was that the mortgages backing the money market were supposedly held by trusts that had lent money to homeowners for 15 years or 30 years.  It was the classic “borrowing short to lend long,” a shell game in which banks have engaged for hundreds of years, routinely precipitating bank panics and bank runs when the depositors or the investors all pull their short-term money out at the same time.

The Shadow Banking System Is Still Unregulated

Periodic bank panics were averted in the conventional banking system only when the government agreed to insure the deposits of individual depositors in 1933.  But FDIC insurance covered only $100,000 (now $250,000), and large institutional investors had far more than that to invest.  The shadow banking system, in which deposits were “insured” with mortgage-backed securities, developed in response.  But the shadow banking system is unregulated and is just as prone to another collapse today as it was in 2008.  The Dodd-Frank banking “reforms” barely touched it.  As noted in an article titled “Risky Debt Use on Repo Market Hits 2008 Levels” in today’s Financial Times:

In the repo market, banks pledge their securities as collateral for short-term loans from money managers and other investors.  The market played a key role in the build-up to the 2008 financial crisis. Banks used toxic assets, such as repackaged subprime loans, to secure trillions of dollars worth of cheap funding.

When the US housing bubble burst, the banks’ trading partners refused to accept such securities as collateral and the repo market rapidly contracted.

However, a study by Fitch Ratings says the proportion of bundled debt being used as security in repo transactions has returned to pre-crisis levels.

Using the repackaged loans can increase risk in the repo market, the rating agency says. This is because the securities may be prone to sudden pullbacks such as the one experienced in 2008.

We could be looking at another banking collapse at any time; and to fix the problem, we first need to know what is going on.  The AGs should not agree to drop the curtain on the robo-signing scandal until all the evidence is on the table.  It is not just a matter of punishing the guilty; it is a matter of a banking scheme based on fraud, one that ultimately does not work and has jeopardized the homes, savings and investments of the public not just recently but for hundreds of years.

The Way Out

There is another way to design a banking system.  The deposits of large institutional investors do not need to be backed by sliced and diced pieces of our homes to be “safe” (something that has proven not to be safe at all).  The large institutional investors seeking safety are largely “us” – the pension funds and mutual funds in which we have stored our savings and on which we rely for support when we can no longer work.  Hundreds of years of history have demonstrated that the only reliable guarantor is the government itself.

Our pension funds and mutual funds need a government guarantee just as much as our individual deposits do.  But we don’t want to be guaranteeing the gambling and derivatives schemes of too-big-to-fail, for-profit Wall Street banks playing fast and loose with our money.  Banking and credit need to be public utilities, operated for the benefit of the public in plain sight of the public.

Ellen Brown – Global Research

You have to wonder….

Banks, accelerating efforts to move troubled mortgages off their books, are offering as much as $35,000 or more in cash to delinquent homeowners to sell their properties for less than they owe.

Lenders have routinely delayed or blocked such transactions, known as short sales, in which they accept less from a buyer than the seller’s outstanding loan. Now banks have decided the deals are faster and less costly than foreclosures, which have slowed in response to regulatory probes of abusive practices. Banks are nudging potential sellers by pre-approving deals, streamlining the closing process, forgoing their right to pursue unpaid debt and in some cases providing large cash incentives, said Bill Fricke, senior credit officer for Moody’s Investors Service in New York.

You mean like, for example, Nevada deciding to actually treat perjury as the felony that it is, and issue a 606 count indictment (along with materially beefing up laws that criminalize this practice.)

It seems to me that perhaps — just perhaps — banks are coming to the conclusion that recovering something on an improperly-documented loan beats recovering nothing, and the latter is becoming increasingly likely.

The better question however is what sort of title is something who buys such a short sale getting?  Is the chain of title any good and did they actually get marketable title?  If not, and they bought owner’s title insurance, is that insurance able to pay (and is the defect not excluded)?

For homeowners who are dramatically underwater and not paying, however, these sorts of “bribes” do make sense.  Recovery value is going to be dramatically impaired if the person in the house is uncooperative and simply sits and waits for the sheriff to show up.  It’s also often that person’s best move if their credit is already trashed, and if they haven’t paid in a year, it is.

One item I’ve noted in the local area is that banks are stringing along short-sale buyers for months, often allegedly telling them they’ll approve a deal in 60 or 90 days and then when there’s a week or two left they ask for more time — usually another month.  Not only does that prevent the house from becoming part of the “cleaning” in the market it also holds the proposed buyer off the market — they are neither a homeowner or looking for another, conventional deal!

To the extent that we’re actually getting decisions and clearing of the market, even as a small incremental step, this is a positive development — even if the motive of the bank making the offer is questionable at best.

The truth is starting to dribble out….

After tracing 840 transactions of $327 billion in the company’s final days, Giddens is still analyzing where some of the $1.2 billion in missing customer money “ended up,” he said in the report. Corzine’s firm failed after credit-rating downgrades, a record quarterly loss and revelations about its $6.3 billion European debt trade unnerved investors. The missing money has sparked Congressional hearings and former customers have said it undermined confidence in the futures industry.

“For three months, our investigative team has worked to understand what happened during the final days of MF Global when cash and related securities movements were not always accurately and promptly recorded due to the chaotic situation and the complexity of the transactions,” Giddens said in a statement.

Yes, it’s so chaotic that you’re moving money around without recording where it went and where it came from?  That sounds like someone who’s not balancing their checkbook eh?

The investigation to date has found that transactions regularly moved between accounts and that funds believed to be in excess of segregation requirements in the commodities segregated accounts were used to fund other daily activities of MF Global. In the past, such transfers were in amounts of less than $50 million, but as liquidity demands increased and could not be met from internal sources, much larger amounts were used, apparently with the assumption that funds would be restored by the end of the day. By Wednesday, October 26th, as the result of increasing demands for funds or collateral throughout MF Global, funds did not return as anticipated.

Ah, I see.  It’s only $50 million that was “moved” (notice that the word “stole” wasn’t used) during the day, replacing the end of the day.

This is sort of like me deciding to “move” your car when you’re sleeping, and as long as I “replace” it by 6:00 AM when you need it to go to work, it’s all ok, right?  If the cops stop me it’s not really stealing because I was going to bring it back, right?

The point here is that it appears from this report that it was common practice for the firm to use customer funds on an intraday basis, essentially like kiting checks, with the presumption that they could make it all good by the close of business.  This leads to the obvious question as to whether this is going on in other firms without detection, as it is strongly implied that this was an absolutely routine thing for the company to do, and it also appears that either CME didn’t catch it or worse they didn’t care.

What’s even worse is that as I’ve pointed out repeatedly since 2007 when I started writing The Ticker off-balance-sheet vehicles are utterly toxic as they hide risk and make it essentially impossible to accurately determine exactly what is going on at any given point in time.  The Trustee’s filed report states:

The sovereign debt investments undertaken on a repo to maturity basis allowed some immediate gains to be booked, but these were purely paper profits generating negligible cash while the underlying transactions resulted in calls for substantial additional margin.

In other words the actual amount of the risk was hidden by not having it out in the open where people could see it, as the repo-to-maturity deals appeared to be “risk free” and off balance sheet but in fact were not risk free and ultimately led to the detonation of the firm.

The heightened risk and apparent loss of confidence drove customers to close their accounts and withdraw funds, resulting in even greater demands on a relatively limited amount of available cash.

Were the firm not “temporarily” stealing customer funds for operating capital then the loss of customer accounts and withdrawal of funds would have shrunk the firm’s operating profit (since the customers would have left) but that should not have caused the company to fail.  More to the point if segregation is being maintained such a “flight” situation can’t lead to the loss of customer money.

There is one interesting chart in the report, on the second-to-last page. Have a look:

This chart appears to imply that new positions were opened in the last days, as initial margin grossly increased, more than doubling between 10/24 and 10/31.  This is not explained in the narrative thus far, but it certainly appears to require some explanation, since initial margin, as the name implies, is posted when one initiates a position.

I may be mis-reading this chart (or some entries are mis-characterized) but if I’m not it looks like it is not the variation margin that blew the firm up (from changes in value) but rather it was initial margin that got them in trouble, and the obvious question that raises is “How?”

The people out there that believe that the U.S. economy is experiencing a permanent recovery and that very bright days are ahead for us should have their heads examined.  Unfortunately, what we are going through right now is simply just a period of “hopetimism” between two financial crashes.  Things may seem relatively stable right now, but it won’t last long.  The truth is that the financial crisis of 2008 was just a warm up act for the economic horror show that is coming.  Nothing really got fixed after the crash of 2008.  We are living in the biggest debt bubble in the history of the world, and it has gotten even bigger since then.  The “too big to fail” banks are larger now than they have ever been.  Americans continue to run up credit card balances like there is no tomorrow.  Tens of thousands of manufacturing facilities and millions of jobs continue to leave the country.  We continue to consume far more than we produce and we continue to become poorer as a nation.  None of the problems that caused the crisis of 2008 have been solved and we are even weaker financially than we were back then.  So why in the world are so many people so optimistic about the economy right now?

Just take a look at the chart posted below.  It shows the growth of total debt in the United States.  During the financial crisis of 2008 there was a little “hiccup”, but the truth is that not much deleveraging really took place at all.  And since the recession “ended”, total credit market debt has gone on to even greater heights….

So what does this mean for the future?

Well, if a small “hiccup” in the debt bubble caused so much chaos back in 2008, what is going to happen when this debt bubble finally bursts?

That is something to think about.

Sadly, most Americans seem oblivious to all of this.

If you go out to malls in the wealthy areas of America today, people are charging up a storm.  In all, Americans charged a whopping 2.5 trillion dollars on their credit cards during 2011.  Way too many people have already forgotten the lessons that we all learned back in 2008.

Of course some Americans pay off their credit cards every month, but way too many Americans are not doing that.  Today, Americans are carrying 793 billion dollars in revolving credit balances.

And student loan debt is an even bigger bubble than credit card debt is.  As I have written about previously, total student loan debt in America is rapidly approaching a trillion dollars.

So it looks like U.S. consumers have not learned to stay away from debt.

That is not good.

Well, what about the banks?

Has the financial system learned any lessons since 2008?

No, not really.

Sadly, the “too big to fail” banks are now even bigger than ever.  The total assets of the six largest U.S. banks increased by 39 percent between September 30, 2006 and September 30, 2011.  If they were to fail today, they would be even more of a threat to our financial system than they were back in 2008.

And our major banks continue to be very highly leveraged.  In fact, major banks all over the world are absolutely swamped with debt.

The following statistics come from Zero Hedge….

The U.S. banking system is leveraged 13 to 1.

The Japanese banking system is leveraged 23 to 1.

The French banking system is leveraged 26 to 1.

The German banking system is leveraged 32 to 1.

These are insane levels of leverage, and they are just inviting another major financial crisis.

Do you all remember Lehman Brothers?  The fact that they were leveraged so highly is what did them in back in 2008.  When the value of their holdings declined by just a little bit they were totally wiped out.

Well, during this next financial crisis large financial institutions are going to be wiped out all over the world.  Major banks all over the globe are going to be crying out for more bailouts when things take a turn against them.

They are making the exact same mistakes that they made before, and they are going to be expecting more government handouts when things go bad.

Will we ever learn?

So obviously the banking system has not learned any lessons.

What about the federal government?

Well, if you follow my blog regularly, you know that I love to write about how horrific U.S. government debt is.

Unfortunately, over the past four years things have gotten so much worse.

Back in 2008, the U.S. national debt crossed the 10 trillion dollar mark.

Just recently, it crossed the 15 trillion dollar mark.

So now we are in a much weaker position financially to respond to another major financial crisis.

Just check out the chart posted below.  This is a recipe for national financial suicide….

During fiscal 2011, the Obama administration stole close to 150 million dollars from our children and our grandchildren every single hour.

At the moment, the legacy of debt that we are passing on to future generations is sitting a grand total of $15,351,406,294,640.49.

But keep in mind that it is going up every single hour.

Meanwhile, our ability to service that debt is declining.  We are rapidly getting poorer as a nation.

During 2011, the amount of money that left the United States exceeded the amount of money that entered the United States by more than a half a trillion dollars.

This gap is called a trade deficit, and it is absolutely ripping our economy to shreds.

For a moment, imagine Uncle Sam standing next to a giant pile of money on a map of the United States.  Then imagine a half a trillion dollars being taken out of that pile every single year.

So why haven’t we totally run out of money yet?

Well, it is because we borrow those dollars back.  In order to maintain our false standard of living, our federal government, our state governments and our local governments have to go out and beg the rest of the world to lend us our dollars back.

Sadly, our government schools have “dumbed-down” the population so much that most of them don’t even know what a “trade deficit” is anymore.

Meanwhile, our economic infrastructure is being gutted like a fish.

Look, I know that I go over this point over and over and over, but it is absolutely imperative that we all understand this.

The half a trillion dollars a year that leaves this country every year could have gone to support businesses and jobs inside the United States.

But instead it is going to support businesses and jobs on the other side of the world.

The consequences of this are absolutely devastating.

According to U.S. Representative Betty Sutton, an average of 23 manufacturing facilities a day closed down in the United States during 2010.  Overall, more than 56,000 manufacturing facilities in the United States have shut down since 2001.

Even many so-called “American companies” have been bought up by the rest of the world.  The following comes from a recent article posted on Economy In Crisis….

RCA is now a French company, Zenith is a Korean company. Frigidaire is a Swedish company. IBM’s Personal Computer Division—with its 500 patents—is now a Chinese company. Westinghouse Nuclear Energy’s major shareholder is Toshiba—a Japanese Company. Lucent Technologies, a former research division of AT&T, along with all the patents acquired from the beginning of the phone system, is now a French company. In 2008, Brazilian-Belgian brewing company InBev purchased the iconic American brewer Anheuser-Busch, makers of Budweiser. With the sale of these manufacturing companies, the future profit and technologies all belong to foreign entities.

We once had the greatest economic machine in the history of the world.

Now it is being dismantled and bought up by foreigners.

When America’s economic infrastructure declines, that means that there are less jobs available for all of us.

As I wrote about the other day, the employment situation in this country is not getting better and we have never even come close to recovering from the recession that started back in 2008.

During 2008 and 2009, the U.S. economy lost millions of jobs.  Since the beginning of 2010, the percentage of the U.S. population that has had a job has remained very stable….

Normally, when a recession ends the percentage of Americans that have a job bounces back pretty dramatically.

So considering the fact that the employment situation has never recovered from the last financial crisis, what is going to happen when the next financial crisis hits?

And most of the jobs that have been “created” during this so-called “recovery” have been low income jobs.  In fact, if you look closely at the employment numbers that were released last Friday, you will find that the vast majority of the “new jobs” were part-time jobs.

But you cannot pay a mortgage and support a family on a part-time job.

Sadly, the truth is that median household income in America has been steadily dropping over the past several years.  Tens of millions of American families are deeply struggling and more Americans than ever are falling into poverty.

Back in the year 2000, about one out of every nine Americans was living in poverty.  Today, about one out of every seven Americans is living in poverty.

All of this is causing a great deal of anxiety in America today.  Large numbers of Americans know that something has fundamentally changed, even if they don’t understand the specifics.  That is one reason why sites such as this one have become so popular.  People want some answers.

And once people get some answers about what is really happening, they tend to want to prepare for the hard times that are coming.

In a few days, a new series on National Geographic entitled “Doomsday Preppers” premieres.  The mainstream media is starting to take notice of the growing “prepper” movement in America today.  It is estimated that there are at least 2 million “preppers” in the United States at this point.  Of course people are “prepping” for a whole host of reasons, but the number one concern among most groups of preppers is the economy.

As the economy crumbles, more Americans than ever have decided that it is not a good thing to be 100% dependent on the system.

Back in 2008 and 2009, millions of Americans suddenly lost their jobs.  Because they did not have any finances stored up, large numbers of them also lost their homes.  Many went from being solidly middle class to being out on the street in a matter of months.

That doesn’t have to happen to you.  Instead of blowing your money on frivolous things, do what you can to set something aside for the difficult times that are on the horizon.

A lot of those “in the know” are quietly making their own preparations.  For example, legendary film director James Cameron (Avatar, Titanic and Terminator) has purchased more than 2600 acres of farmland in New Zealand and he is getting out of the U.S. for good apparently.

Unfortunately, most of us do not have the resources for something like that.  But what most of us can do is we can change our priorities and start focusing on the things that will help us survive the hard times that are coming.

So are you ready?

The Economic Collapse

Read this carefully and you might figure out the problem…

SPRINGFIELD — Making local school districts pick up the employers’ portion of teacher retirement benefits could save more than $1.3 billion a year for Illinois’ beleaguered state treasury. It also could mean financial ruin for some local school districts, school administrators say.

Financial ruin?  How did that happen?

“That would kill school districts, at least most districts. For us, we’re living paycheck to paycheck,” said Tony Sanders, chief of staff for Elgin School District U-46, the state’s largest district outside Chicago. Sanders said the state owes it $12 million for this school year. “There is no magic pool of dollars waiting for us to swim in.”

So what did you promise the teachers with when you negotiated the contracts, including those pensions?  Where was the magic pool of dollars then?

Oh, see, that’s the fraud, and everyone involved in it both needs to get run out of town on a rail and be prosecuted.  There was no magic pool of money, but boy oh boy did those promises get made.

This is identical to what happened in this area when the School District tried to get a 1/2 cent sales tax levy for replacement of refrigerators and roofs on school buildings.  Refrigerators and roofs that were installed years ago, which the school district knew damn well had a service life and therefore should have an impound account that is funded every year so as to provide that “pool of money” with which to replace the now-worn-out items.

But the district instead effectively stole those funds and spent them elsewhere by not allocating them to that impound account in the first place, thereby allowing the district to spend money it didn’t factually have.  Once the shortfall became apparent years later they bleated to the people and asked that we pay twice.

The people here (wisely) said “No — you did not properly budget and set aside these funds, you figure out where to take it from and restore fiscal sanity.”  My personal recommendation is that the board members and administrators be fired and/or have their salaries confiscated, including that of the Superintendent, until it’s covered.  After all, what you really need in a school is teachers, a janitor to sweep the floor, a principal and perhaps one vice principal, and one person to answer the phones.  Everything else may be nice, but in terms of actually educating kids it’s not required.

“I’m trying to see how it equates to good education, sound education, fiscal education, for students if you want the best for them,” said Pam Manning, superintendent of Cahokia School District 187, already on the state’s “financial watch list” because of a shaky budget condition. “We need more services, or at least need to maintain the services we’ve been providing.”

No, you need to stop stealing the people’s money.  When you make promises you must be prepared to fulfill them.  If you can’t reasonably figure out where the funds are going to come from and secure them, then you can’t make the promises.  This called accountability and we the people need to start demanding it from top to bottom.

You’ve made promises you can’t cover and now you want everyone else to take care of that for you.

The correct answer to that request, incidentally, is “No.”