Archive for the ‘Unemployment Claims’ Category
Unemployment Claims
Eh, am I supposed to be impressed?
In the week ending November 5, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 390,000, a decrease of 10,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 400,000. The 4-week moving average was 400,000, a decrease of 5,250 from the previous week’s revised average of 405,250.
Yeah, ok. Let’s see what the revisions are next week.
The “big table” from the 15th (it’s a bit more lagged) shows a +51,990 print however, with all of it coming from EUC and Extended benefit roll-ins. The rate of regular claims, which has been declining, has now stabilized — it is not dropping any more. This is bad if it continues and a 390k print is not consistent with job growth. The best you can say is that we continue to see what we have seen in the employment rate table — there’s no improvement happening at all; rather, we’re just rattling around on the floor.
Here It Comes Again (Jobless Claims)
So much for “higher commodity prices won’t do anything.”
In the week ending April 16, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 403,000, a decrease of 13,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 416,000. The 4-week moving average was 399,000, an increase of 2,250 from the previous week’s revised average of 396,750.
Still have that “4″ handle don’t we? This ought to put a cap on the claims of “job growth”; claims numbers in the low 300,000s are consistent with that, not numbers near or above 400,000.
What’s worse is that extended benefits are now starting to run out “en-masse” across multiple states. The reason for much of this is technical in how eligibility is computed – many have a “x% rate over the 12 or 24 month ago rate”, and now that joblessness has become endemic over an extended period, those extended benefits no longer apply.
The first-week of “hopefulness” is reflected in the “big table” (which is a couple of weeks behind the headline number); don’t expect the “nice” number reported here to be sustainable. It’s not, given the last two week’s reports.
What’s driving this? Commodity prices. At the margin ramps in commodities, especially gasoline, causes a huge problem for consumers and ultimately knocks many in the lower economic strata off the horse. When you’re making $10/hour and it costs you an hour of work to get to and from your job, as is the case for many with less-efficient, older vehicles (all they can afford) living at some distance from their job, there’s a breaking point where you simply can’t afford to go to work any more.
I know what the greenies will say: Move closer to work. That’s a nice sentiment, but you might want to think about how you execute on that when you’re living in a house that’s underwater $30,000 and thus you can’t sell it to make that move.
The vise tightens ever-further on the lowest two quintiles in our economy the longer our idiotic monetary and fiscal policy continues in what has thus far and will ultimately prove to be a futile attempt to cover up the raw insolvency of Wall Street mavens.
Unemployment Claims: More Revisions Mask Truth
There’s nothing like a revision to turn an increase into a decrease….
In the week ending March 26, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 388,000, a decrease of 6,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 394,000. The 4-week moving average was 394,250, a increase of 3,250 from the previous week’s revised average of 391,000.
Except last week they said….
In the week ending March 19, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 382,000, a decrease of 5,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 387,000. The 4-week moving average was 385,250, a decrease of 1,500 from the previous week’s revised average of 386,750.
Got that? They adjusted the previous week’s claims number up 12,000 and then claim that a 6,000 decrease from the revised number is a falling number. No, it’s a 6,000 claim increase.
See how they lie?
The “big table” doesn’t tell us much – it’s basically flat for the week of the 12th.
Nothing in here changes my view on the number tomorrow – +150k with a 50k error bound, but as is always the case I care nothing for the “headline” machined number from the Bureau of Lies and Slander (BLS); the important data, which I will analyze as I always do, is found in the household tables where they actually count people instead of “massaging” the figures to suit whatever they desire – and think they can get away with.
Unemployment Improving? Not So Fast
First, we have a look at the actual report issued today (upon which the media is slobbering all over themselves cheerleading), from Karl Denninger over at The Market-Ticker:
Claims: Hmmmm.. Do I Believe Them?In the week ending Feb. 26, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 368,000, a decrease of 20,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 388,000. The 4-week moving average was 388,500, a decrease of 12,750 from the previous week’s revised average of 401,250.
That’s legitimate improvement. It suggests we’re getting close to a zero job-loss rate (but unfortunately, that’s also a zero job-gain rate, and we’re still adding ~100,000 people a month coming into the workforce.)
Nonetheless it’s a good number.
The full picture from the middle of the month, however, is more problematic:
There’s a problem here though in that the week related to in this table showed 410k. That was up a bit, but the fact remains that we’re +74k on this chart, and it’s all in extended benefits.
We’ll see what tomorrow comes up with in the employment report. I’m not biting on the ADP number; there are a lot of people who are, but not me. I’m looking for +100k but with a larger-than-normal error band, +/- 50k, and a flat to slightly-down household participation rate.
We’ll see how I did tomorrow.
So, a solid ‘maybe’ there’s some improvement in this single report.
Next let’s consider a report out published at Investors Daily and look at the bigger picture:
Layoffs At Pre-Recession Level; Job Openings Down 30%
Twenty months after the worst recession in decades, job creation remains anemic, weighing on economic growth and making it even harder for the long-term jobless to find work.
Don’t blame layoffs. They spiked in 2009 but have returned to pre-slump levels, according to Labor Department data. But job openings remain 30% below their level when the downturn hit in December 2007. Gross hiring is down by 843,000 jobs.
While the economy has grown modestly in recent quarters, hiring remains depressed due to uncertainty about future demand, concerns about government policies and efficiency gains that have let companies do more with less.
“It’s the drop in job openings, not the increase in job losses that is responsible for so much of the increase in unemployment,” said James Sherk, a labor policy analyst at the Heritage Foundation.
Labor is expected to report Friday that the U.S. added a net 183,000 jobs in February, the most since last May. The jobless rate is seen ticking up 0.1 point to 9.1% as more people entered the labor force. Many of those new or returning job-seekers will likely find only disappointment.
December job openings fell by 139,000 to 3.06 million, the third straight decline, according to Labor’s Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey. January’s JOLTS survey is due March 11.
There were 4.7 job-seekers for each opening in December, off a peak of 6.3 in July 2009 but still far above the 1.15 ratio typical before the recession, according to the Economic Policy Institute.
“We are still very near the bottom of a very huge crater,” said Heidi Shierholz, an EPI labor economist.
The U.S. has expanded for six quarters, but growth has been modest by historical standards. Strong head winds remain, from a still-moribund housing market to $100 oil and looming fiscal tightening at all levels of government.
Uncertainty about ObamaCare costs have also made firms cautious about hiring, analysts said.
Uh, now that’s not so good. While companies may have slowed their actual layoffs, new people continue to come into the work force unabated, and cannot find work. What tempers the government reports is that people who finally give up after months or sometimes years of looking are not counted in their figures. I don’t know about you, but if I couldn’t find work in two years, it would sure be adding insult to injury to not be included in the unemployment figures.
Now let’s look at some charts from the new Gallup report:
This makes it pretty clear that the employment situation has been deteriorating anew since November 2010. It is essentially back to the levels of January last year.
Finally, we go to what I consider most reliable, ShadowStats:
The red line is the official government unemployment number (U3), the grey line is the old government measurement of unemployment (U6), which used to include all people, including those who have given up, and the blue line is ShadowStats proprietary measurement (SGS).
I’d say that REAL unemployment is now just shy of 20% nationwide. Remember, for historical reference, at the peak of the Great Depression, unemployment reached 25%.
Unemployment improving? I don’t think so.
Jobless Claims: Whassup With That?
In the week ending Feb. 5, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 383,000, a decrease of 36,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 419,000. The 4-week moving average was 415,500, a decrease of 16,000 from the previous week’s revised average of 431,500.
Ok, that’s positive. But the last two weeks have seen the seasonally-adjusted and non-adjusted figures very close. This week? Uhhh….
The advance number of actual initial claims under state programs, unadjusted, totaled 438,548 in the week ending Feb. 5, a decrease of 25,928 from the previous week. There were 507,634 initial claims in the comparable week in 2010.
Well well…. more than 55,000 people were magically subtracted due to alleged seasonal factors.
Hmmmm….
Well, we got a few things here. First, we now have a clean understanding of the crap number in the employment report, as there’s really no ”there” there. Second, I don’t believe the seasonally-adjusted numbers.
The market doesn’t believe it either, judging from the futures reaction.
Initial Jobless Claims – UGLY
Claims: Where Are The Apologists Now?

In the week ending Jan. 8, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 445,000, an increase of 35,000 from the previous week’s revised figure of 410,000. The 4-week moving average was 416,500, an increase of 5,500 from the previous week’s revised average of 411,000.
It’s worse….
The advance number of actual initial claims under state programs, unadjusted, totaled 770,413 in the week ending Jan. 8, an increase of 191,686 from the previous week. There were 815,593 initial claims in the comparable week in 2010.
770,000?! Holy crap.
Now here’s reality folks – I said last week that I didn’t believe the “3 handle” folks nor that the problem was over, and that seasonal distortions and idiocy in the labor department was responsible. Of course “idiocy” implies unknowing distortion, which is a damn hard argument to make when the “errors” are all in one direction – and they both are and have been.
How about intentional lies instead?
In any event this ought to take some hot air out of people’s BS-running lungs.
The other not-good thing is that the ranks of those going back into the extended programs was up for the week of the 25th too – by 195,000.
This is unambiguously bad – extended benefits AND initial benefits both up materially, and note that this was a week during which people said that the claims numbers were generally “good”.
Nope.
Wake up folks – the supposed “economic expansion” is complete crap and is all government blowing money they don’t have.
The end of that rope is approaching.
Fast.
And the floor of the canyon we’re rappelling down is 500′ below us.












