Archive for the ‘Wells Fargo’ Category
Wait. What? Actual HANDCUFFS?

NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL (Catherine Cortez Masto) TO FILE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST WELLS FARGO FOR FORGERY
“WE’VE GOT THEM COLD.”
EDITOR’S NOTE: We have all said what they did was criminal, now it is becoming official. And before you naysayers start complaining, let me point out that this has actually followed an orderly progression and you will see it many times over in the coming months.
- First we started with the deductive logic and investigation, and allegations by borrowers in court. They were not taken seriously until the number of such complaints reached a crescendo, but that is the way our system works.
- Then the regulators, who had turned a deaf ear to anyone writing a letter complaining about the servicing of their loan or the behavior of a pretender lender, turned themselves around and entered a slew of cease and desist, consent orders and those orders have teeth and can be used by borrowers in discovery and in their pleadings. The agency findings of misbehavior are presumptively correct.
- Now the justice system is getting involved, because building criminal cases takes a lot longer than civil cases or even administrative cases against the banks. Remember they have to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt — not merely on innuendo or they “must have done it” or anything but that they did do it, they knew they did it and they did it with criminal intent.
Wells Fargo accused of forging loan documents
Wells Fargo Accused of Forging Loan Documents
Posted: Sep. 22, 2011 | 2:02 a.m.
Updated: Sep. 22, 2011 | 8:27 a.m.A Las Vegas attorney who represents people facing foreclosure has accused Wells Fargo of forging loan documents. The allegation is the latest sign that efforts to hold mortgage lenders accountable are escalating in Nevada.In court papers filed this month in Clark County District Court, attorney Dave Crosby alleged bank employees committed forgery and fraud in making a $350,000 loan to a father of four who was unemployed at the time.“They forged signatures, they backdated documents,” Crosby said. “We’ve got them cold.”Crosby said the bank has presented two deeds of trust for the same property. One bears the signature of Olivia A. Todd, who on Jan. 27, 2010, was identified as an assistant secretary with MERS, Inc., a mortgage servicer from the Phoenix area and a co-defendant in the lawsuit.
But on Feb. 16, 2010, Todd’s signature appears on a second deed of trust, where she is identified as the firm’s president. Both assignments were notarized as authentic, Crosby said in court papers.
Crosby made his allegations in a request to have a judge review three failed mediations between him and his clients, Ryan and Mical Henderson of Las Vegas, and lawyers with Wells Fargo, formerly Wells Fargo Home Mortgage.
Attempts to contact bank attorney Kevin Soderstrom were unsuccessful. Calls to Wells Fargo also went unreturned.
Nevada Foreclosure Mediation rules allow for a judicial review of failed mediations. In Clark County, District Judge Donald Mosley hears all such reviews.
The Legislature created the Foreclosure Mediation Program in 2009 to help thousands of troubled homeowners in the state, considered ground zero of the U.S. housing crisis, where tens of thousands of homes have been abandoned or foreclosed and a staggering 80 percent of homeowners owe significantly more than their homes are worth.
But banks and title insurance companies have not always been able to prove they own the mortgage and have the right to foreclose.
The Henderson case is the latest shot across the bow of mortgage lenders. The Nevada Supreme Court has issued rulings favoring homeowners in several recent cases on appeal. Nevada Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto is expected to file criminal charges against bank and title company employees, as well as notary publics, over allegations of robo signing.
The term applies to a practice of signing affidavits attesting that bank officials have reviewed documents and found them proper even without making any review.
When the robo-signing scandal erupted last October in Florida, bank employees admitted to signing 10,000 documents a month without knowing whether they are legitimate.
Masto’s office declined comment on any plans for criminal action against robo-signers. She has taken an aggressive approach to holding banks accountable, and the Legislature earlier this year enacted new laws regarding robo signing.
Crosby said he suspects robo-signing is widespread in Nevada. One of his cases was the subject of an appeal filed with the state’s high court, and he used the lender’s own words against it.
Supreme Court justices found in favor of Crosby’s client, Moises Leyva, ruling unanimously that lenders have an absolute duty to strictly follow foreclosure mediation rules exactly as written.
More important, the high court ensured lenders couldn’t simply provide a sworn statement, often from their own employees, that they were the lender even when they failed to provide a verified copy of the deed of trust.
“They admitted how disorganized they were, that they lost paperwork,” Crosby said.
In court papers, Crosby accused Wells Fargo of continuing to play outside the lines. He alleged that a document the bank produced during mediation was backdated and bore a style of notary stamp that didn’t exist at the time it was signed. The document is included in the court file.
He also alleged that two documents bore the name of a bank employee and “are notarized by the same notary, (but) both signatures do not belong to the same person.”
Crosby wants Mosley to rule that Wells Fargo acted in bad faith, to award sanctions for the “obvious forged, backdated and falsified documents” and to award cash sanctions.
Crosby will ask Mosley to fine Wells Fargo an amount equal to the difference between the loan and the home’s current value.
The Supreme Court in its recent decision has made it clear to judges that such sanctions are appropriate when lenders are found to have acted in bad faith. A hearing has been scheduled for Oct. 6.
Review-Journal writer Chris Sieroty contributed to this report. Contact Doug McMurdo at dmcmurdo@reviewjournal.com or 224-5512.
Neil Garfield – Living Lies
“Welcome Speculators, Please Press Your Bets”

Well now Moody’s has gone and done it.
They just hit BAC, C and WFC with downgrades, saying that the government is “more likely” to allow a large bank to fail if they get in trouble.
This belies the truth, which is that the government doesn’t have the capacity to bail out a trillion-dollar boondoggle any more. There’s no way to get another TARP through Congress and there’s no back-door way to fund it either.
So Moody’s is correct, in a round-about sort of fashion. Let’s not conflate desire with capacity, eh?
The entire banking sector took an instant dive on that, with BAC now down more than 5% and Wells, which was up, back to even.
Bank of America’s insular, CEO-blowing board needs to do some firing in the executive suite. May I suggest a Howitzer for the means of that “firing”?
Frankly I’m not sure it matters at this point. Countrywide was a monstrous mistake, and a very expensive one on top of it. Tangelo should have been peeled in 2008 if not before rather than riding off into the sunset with a civil penalty that Bank of America paid a huge chunk of. Nobody seems to care much about the fact that all of these banks have been implicated in various schemes and frauds related to foreclosures – not that this is new, of course, in that they did the same thing on the way up with appraisals and similar, blacklisting honest appraisers and essentially demanding overvaluations to “support” their reckless lending.
Now let’s add to that: Nevada is apparently preparing to criminally charge some of these institutions. That’s not sue, it’s prosecute. We don’t yet know who the targets are but this will mark the first actual criminal indictments of note should they actually appear. For my part I’m not going to believe it until I see it, considering how overdue such an action is in the context of anything even lightly-related to the concept of ”justice.”
Are we finally going to “Stop the looting and start prosecuting”? Hope springs eternal.
Here’s the rub, when you get down to it: Every one of these institutions should have been a zero in 2008 and the executives should have been brought up on indictments. As such the alleged “value” in these firms is nothing more than government support for the same sort of business model as Full Tilt Poker is accused of – that is, claiming value in assets that does not in fact exist, relying on the belief that everyone will not show up and demand their money at the same time. Proof of this is readily available every day in the market in that these firms are selling at a fraction of their claimed book value; if there was anyone who believed that the accounting was honest they’d instantly buy the firm in question as that would be fastest and most-certain money ever made in M&A.
That it hasn’t happened is all the proof you need that the accounting is absolute and utter crap.
Oh Mr. Buffett? How’s your position in BAC working out?
Confidential Federal Audits Accuse Five Biggest Mortgage Firms of Defrauding Taxpayers

So Where Are The Cops Again?
Gee, what have I been talking about for a couple of years now?
WASHINGTON — A set of confidential federal audits accuse the nation’s five largest mortgage companies of defrauding taxpayers in their handling of foreclosures on homes purchased with government-backed loans, four officials briefed on the findings told The Huffington Post.
No, really?
And if you remember, I and others have talked about FHA guaranteed loan performance not being exactly honestly reported either…..
The resulting reports read like veritable indictments of major lenders, the sources said. State officials are now wielding the documents as leverage in their ongoing talks with mortgage companies aimed at forcing the firms to agree to pay fines to resolve allegations of routine violations in their handling of foreclosures.
Oh yeah, fines. Rip people off, pay a fine. We’re just going to continue what we’ve been doing, right? Make it perfectly ok – a business practice. Commit 100 felonies, get caught committing 10 of them and say “Oh gee, I’m sorry, here have that back.”
But you get to keep the fruits of the other ninety!
Justice officials will soon meet with the largest servicers and walk them through the allegations and potential liability each of them face, the sources said.
I’ll believe it when I see filed charges.
Rather than punishing banks for misdeeds, the administration is now focused on helping troubled borrowers in the hope that it will stanch the flood of foreclosures and increase consumer confidence, officials involved in the negotiations said.
Right – breaking the law is just fine if you’re a bankster.
You know damn well the government isn’t going to do jack about this, and you also know damn well that the State AGs will kneel before the banskters rather than sue or prosecute as well.
It’s all they’d done thus far.
We’re all rendered nothing more than maids servicing these jackasses – by force – in their expensive hotel suites.
Sigh: Reading Retention Anyone? (Wachovia, Money and Drugs)
From The Guardian:
On 10 April 2006, a DC-9 jet landed in the port city of Ciudad del Carmen, on the Gulf of Mexico, as the sun was setting. Mexican soldiers, waiting to intercept it, found 128 cases packed with 5.7 tons of cocaine, valued at $100m. But something else – more important and far-reaching – was discovered in the paper trail behind the purchase of the plane by the Sinaloa narco-trafficking cartel.
During a 22-month investigation by agents from the US Drug Enforcement Administration, the Internal Revenue Service and others, it emerged that the cocaine smugglers had bought the plane with money they had laundered through one of the biggest banks in the United States: Wachovia, now part of the giant Wells Fargo.
I’ve gotten at least a dozen emails over the last couple of days frantically asking me to cover this story. Naked Capitalism said:
If this news story does not prove that banks are effectively above the law, I don’t know what does. The Guardian, in an account yet to be picked up anywhere in the US media (per Google News as of this posting, hat tip readers May S and Swedish Lex) reports that Wachovia was at the heart of one of the world’s biggest money laundering operations, moving $378.4 billion into dollar-based accounts from Mexican casas de cambio, which are currency exchange firms. While these transfers took place over a period of years, the article notes that it equals 1/3 of Mexican GDP. And the resolution?
Oh really? Not picked up anywhere in the United States eh?
Shall we set the wayback machine?
Gee, it’s not enough to steal from ordinary Americans, it’s not enough to rip off state and city governments, it’s not enough to rig bids in the municipal bond markets, we must sit still while these institutions literally make possible funding criminal gangs that are committing murder.
There’s a name for this folks.
Dateline: The Market Ticker, June 29th, 2010
The Market Ticker did cover this story in detail - nearly a year ago.
The real question is why this wasn’t picked up by everyone last year, why it wasn’t run into the ground, and why only now, when the deferred prosecution agreement expired, are people talking about it.
That’s right – now the media will cover it, including The Guardian!
Mish covered this story in July, incidentally, so it wasn’t like The Market Ticker was the only site that was talking about it.
I have one question for everyone, and it’s a really important question that bears on exactly how we have gotten to be where we are – that is, where “certain special people and institutions” can do damn near anything they want – law or no law:
How’d we get beyond the deferred prosecution boundary before all these supposed journalists “discovered” this story, when in fact not only did I report on it nearly a year ago but so did a few others. Now we have people profess, for the first time, to see that this is “proof that banks are effectively above the law.”
Wouldn’t the below have been an interesting question for Yves to ask Timmy Geither during her audience at Treasury in August of 2010 - with many other bloggers present?
“How do you defend not attempt to convict Wachovia or any of the bank officers for alleged money laundering on behalf of Mexican drug cartels in the amount of nearly $400 billion – money that we know was used, directly and indirectly, to slaughter both Mexican citizens and Americans? In what form or fashion is it in the public interest to not only allow a tiny fine of less than one tenth of one percent of the loot so-transferred to be paid but to refuse to criminally try the institution and every officer and employee involved in this offense?“
Now that would have been worth being a fly on the wall for.
Of course you wouldn’t exactly make the Christmas list if you asked such a question, and you might not have been invited at all had you ran the story and asked this question before hand…. right?
PS: I’d still like to see that question asked. Hell will freeze first.
Gee The FRAUD In HAMP Is Coming Out?
Hoh hoh hoh… read this one carefully folks.
SAN DIEGO (CN) – A La Jolla man can keep his home for now, after a federal judge granted his motion for a temporary restraining order blocking Washington Mutual and JP Morgan from foreclosing on his house because the banks misled him into defaulting on his mortgage.
Kaveh Khast claimed the banks instructed him to stop making his mortgage payments so he could qualify for a loan modification.
Yep.
HAMP was a scam and a fraud. It was designed to induce people to default on their loans on purpose in order to get a modification.
But the modification was “optional” (helped along in many cases by intentionally losing documents sent through certified mail!) and as such the banks did exactly that.
Now we have judges – finally – pushing back and recognizing the inherent fraud in that scam.
A scam hatched by The Federal Government and Treasury in collusion with the banks.
I think there’s a law against this somewhere….. will it be enforced? 
Oh, You Thought We'd Forget The Felonies? Nope.
(COLUMBUS, Ohio) — In response to Wells Fargo’s statement acknowledging that it “made mistakes” and that affidavits in 55,000 foreclosures filed by the bank did not “adhere” to the law, Ohio Attorney General Richard Cordray offers the following statement:
“The big mortgage servicers and financial firms continue to demonstrate their belief that they do not need to play by the same rules as everyone else who uses our court system. The suggestion by Wells Fargo and its colleagues at several other national firms that they can cure fraudulent testimony by simply refiling new affidavits and continuing to proceed toward foreclosures shows they do not recognize the seriousness of the problem they have created. There is no simple ‘do-over’ for false testimony that will be likely to avoid sanctions and penalties imposed by the courts. Their brazen efforts to minimize their financial exposure by sweeping these problems under the rug are an insult to the justice system in this country. These disclosures by Wells Fargo will now become the focus for a new prong of our on-going investigation.”
Please?







